Time to Shut Down Pornhub

The Name of Love

Far Right Nutjob

In the last few months, there have been several shocking cases of sex trafficking and child rape films that were hosted on Pornhub. A 15-year-old girl who had been missing for a year was finally found after her mother was tipped off that her daughter was being featured in videos on the site — 58 such videos of her rape and sexual abuse were discovered on Pornhub.

Her trafficker, who was seen in the videos raping the child, was identified using surveillance footage of him at a 7-Eleven where he was spotted with his victim. He is now facing a felony charge.

Also in recent news was the case of 22 women who were deceived and coerced by Michael Pratt, owner of GirlsDoPorn, into performing sex acts on film that were subsequently uploaded to Pornhub. These women sued GirlsDoPorn and won a $12.7 million lawsuit against the company. According to a federal indictment, Pratt and his co-conspirators produced child pornography and trafficked a minor. Pratt reportedly fled the United States for New Zealand and is currently wanted on a federal warrant. But there are other individuals complicit in these crimes that should also be wanted by law enforcement — CEO Ferris Antoon and COO David Tassillo of Mindgeek, the Canadian-based company that owns Pornhub.

You see, Pornhub is complicit in the trafficking of these women and minors and probably thousands more like them.

Seriously, all of the people responsible better repent to the Lord God or they will be roasted alive in Hell.

This just confirms all of my suspicions about pornography websites. Just check out this article's description of the BDSM website Kink Dot Com.

Kink’s rise from niche to marquee just happens to coincide with the arrival of Tube sites in 2006, which are uniquely effective at triggering the Coolidge Effect and turning porn addicts into novelty-seeking machines. It’s important to note that, while an attraction to what you might call “light kink”—fluffy pink handcuffs, a rhinestone-bedazzled blindfold, that sort of thing—has been hovering around in our popular culture for decades, and therefore some version of this has been part of pornography for ages, Kink is the real article. It’s not just acting. Women are caned and whipped until they are bruised and red. Not only are the sex acts themselves extreme (you name it, it’s there), but scenes are scripted around the psychological and symbolic, not just physical, degradation of the woman. Fifty Shades of Grey is to Kink as a Hitchcock movie is to a snuff film.

When the films have a storyline, it can usually be summed up with one word: rape. Or two words: brutal rape. It’s one thing to be aroused by a sadomasochistic scene where the sub (as the term of art goes) is shown visibly enjoying the treatment; it’s quite another to be aroused by watching a woman scream in agony and despair as she is held down and violently raped.

One series of Kink videos is based on the following concept: the pornstar is alone in a room with several men; the director explains to her (and we watch) that if she can leave the room, she gets cash; for each article of clothing she still has on at the end of the scene, she gets cash; for each sex act that one of the men gets to perform on her, he gets cash and she loses money. One has to grant them a devilish kind of cleverness: it lets them enact an actual violent rape with legal impunity. The woman really resists; the men really force themselves brutally on her. Of course, she “consented” to the whole thing, which, somehow, makes it legal.

I ask you to read that whole article, by the way. It's chock full of facts on pornography by a Catholic who would normally "recoil" at my "puritanical" views.

So how can we solve this problem? I think that these articles could give us some good ideas.

First Things said:
There are at least three politically feasible legislative solutions to the pornography crisis that should pass constitutional muster under the guidelines established in Reno. The first solution is to regulate pornography at the Internet Service Provider level by passing a law or enacting a rule requiring ISPs to provide a default version of the Internet that is filtered of indecent content, while allowing adult users the ability to opt in to an unfiltered version of the Internet.

[...]

Another option, likely to face greater legal skepticism, is to regulate pornography websites through domain “zoning.” O’Connor and Rehnquist suggested “‘gateway’ technology” that “requires Internet users to enter information about themselves—perhaps an adult identification number or a credit card number—before they can access certain areas of cyberspace, much like a bouncer checks a person’s driver’s license before admitting him to a nightclub.”

[...]

The last solution is fairly aggressive and touches on a familiar issue. There has been much discussion among conservatives about rewriting Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act: the immunity carve-out for Big Tech companies that allows them to avoid civil liability for content posted by users on their platforms. This protection also applies to user-submitted pornography aggregation sites—imagine Instagram or YouTube, but for pornography—which make up the majority of free pornography sites on the Internet.

Congress could rewrite the CDA so as to strip Section 230 immunity from sites that publish obscene and indecent material, thus opening these sites to civil liability for the content posted on their platforms. This would present a problem for many of these sites, especially the aggregation sites, which often host pornography featuring individuals who did not consent to having their likeness distributed to the public. In the distribution of such content, people are sexually exploited by a billion-dollar industry while receiving no compensation for the physical, professional, and emotional damages caused to them. They deserve their day in court.

Public Discourse said:
The answer is that what has become a cultural force must be stymied chiefly by cultural counter-force. Effective social control of obscenity in a free, porn-saturated society calls for a creative, synergistic partnership among educators, pastors, journalists, and other culture-forming actors to morally stigmatize pornography as toxic to genuine reciprocity and mutuality in sexual relationships, as well as a standing threat to anything close to the healthy psycho-sexual development of children and teens. Public authority has an indispensable role to play in this partnership, too. For law powerfully shapes culture and thus shapes us—our actions, our attitudes, and our conception of right and wrong.

[...]

Criminal law enforcement should therefore be stepped up against those who recklessly expose children to pornography. The particularly callous disregard shown by such malefactors for the child’s well-being, as well as for his or her parents’ rightful authority to educate their children, makes them proper targets for prosecution.

Which laws are we talking about? New York’s basic “obscenity” prohibition (under which I occasionally prosecuted performers and sales clerks when I was a Manhattan prosecutor in the 1980s), is typical of state provisions. It criminalizes conduct by anyone who “produces, presents, or directs an obscene performance or participates in a part thereof which is obscene or which contributes to its obscenity.” On top of all state laws of this sort sits a group of federal prohibitions, including bans on importing, mailing, and possessing with intent to distribute “any obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy book, pamphlet, picture, motion picture, letter, writing, [or] print.”

Leave your comments below.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
Its actually a very bad idea to get rid of pornhub.

We have literally spent the last what 4 years dealing with a massive deplatforming drive, the porn industry like it or not has more experience, money, and capability to fight censorship we do not live in an ideal world right now. We live in if a few things go wrong we will be lined up against the wall and murdered kind of situation that's how bad it is.

This is a situation where you need as many allies as possible and you have to put your personal stuff aside in the name of survival.

If they go we are next and we are not nearly as wealthy strong or powerful as the porn industry.
 

The Name of Love

Far Right Nutjob
Its actually a very bad idea to get rid of pornhub.

We have literally spent the last what 4 years dealing with a massive deplatforming drive, the porn industry like it or not has more experience, money, and capability to fight censorship we do not live in an ideal world right now. We live in if a few things go wrong we will be lined up against the wall and murdered kind of situation that's how bad it is.

This is a situation where you need as many allies as possible and you have to put your personal stuff aside in the name of survival.

If they go we are next and we are not nearly as wealthy strong or powerful as the porn industry.
So... we just let Pornhub make child porn with impunity in the name of fighting tech censorship?

Even though pornography itself is causing massive health problems?

I'll never get you free speech types.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
So... we just let Pornhub make child porn with impunity in the name of fighting tech censorship?

Even though pornography itself is causing massive health problems?

I'll never get you free speech types.

Pornhub can work with authorities to catch the people responsible, they have done so in the past they can do so again.

And yes I consider tech censorship the much bigger issue, because they don't just want to silence us they want to take away our jobs, want to take away our ability to do fincial transactions, and absolutely no one is safe from it.

That's a much bigger threat to our personal survival.


And as for you not getting me, of course you don't the foundation of our moral code of ethics are completely different. The fundamental core of my system of moral ethics is built on liberty, your foundation is built on stability. There are going to be times where my value system seems utterally alien to you and there are differently times when your system seems alien to me, right now though were both up shit creek so we need to put aside our differences in the name of mutual survival.
 

The Name of Love

Far Right Nutjob
Pornhub can work with authorities to catch the people responsible, they have done so in the past they can do so again.

And yes I consider tech censorship the much bigger issue, because they don't just want to silence us they want to take away our jobs, want to take away our ability to do fincial transactions, and absolutely no one is safe from it.

That's a much bigger threat to our personal survival.
I really don't think tech censorship is a bigger problem than the problem of pornography. Especially since the latter leads to the former. Sexual liberation is a form of psychological warfare designed to break up families and reduce us to atomized individuals beholden to state power while rendering us docile in the face of anarcho-tyranny.

Also, Pornhub is not our friends. You don't think they'd hesitate for a moment to go after so-called "racists" if they were so ordered? It's a big tech company. If it's not already converged, it'll be soon.

And as for you not getting me, of course you don't the foundation of our moral code of ethics are completely different. The fundamental core of my system of moral ethics is built on liberty, your foundation is built on stability. There are going to be times where my value system seems utterally alien to you and there are differently times when your system seems alien to me, right now though were both up shit creek so we need to put aside our differences in the name of mutual survival.
Well, I agree. Big tent and all that. But if you and I can't agree that peddlers of child pornography need to be punished (which Pornhub are), I don't know if there is much of a common ground between us at all.
 

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Its actually a very bad idea to get rid of pornhub.

We have literally spent the last what 4 years dealing with a massive deplatforming drive, the porn industry like it or not has more experience, money, and capability to fight censorship we do not live in an ideal world right now. We live in if a few things go wrong we will be lined up against the wall and murdered kind of situation that's how bad it is.

This is a situation where you need as many allies as possible and you have to put your personal stuff aside in the name of survival.

If they go we are next and we are not nearly as wealthy strong or powerful as the porn industry.
How does it compare with other social media?

Recently Facebook mods are getting PTSD watching everything unsacred under the sun.


Looks more of a trend to sneak in illegal content to a video streaming site.
 

King Krávoka

An infection of Your universe.
While Random Username is right about the general problems with freely available barely regulated content there is a significant trend for luxury products to have human rights violations behind every pound. Perhaps we need "Certified Ethical" stamps for pornography? Or just a ban on gold and coffee and porn and other globalist shit like that.
 

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
While Random Username is right about the general problems with freely available barely regulated content there is a significant trend for luxury products to have human rights violations behind every pound. Perhaps we need "Certified Ethical" stamps for pornography? Or just a ban on gold and coffee and porn and other globalist shit like that.
It's part and parcel of the tools people can use.

WhatsApp got in deep shit in 2018 for that too.

Breaking bad WhatsApp edition.
 

The Name of Love

Far Right Nutjob
@Random Username
I mean, I get that social media services have a general problem enforcing even basic legality standards because of how big they are.

But PornHub actually profited from and encouraged the child rape to happen on their platform. They knowingly verified a trafficked fifteen-year old girl on their platform to feature in porn videos. They have entire sections on their website dedicated to "Teens" with titles including “Young Girl Tricked,” “Innocent Brace Faced Tiny Teen F---ed,” “Tiny Petite Thai Teen,” “Teen Little Girl First Time,” on and on ad infinitum. Just read the article I posted.

To give you a comparison, imagine if Facebook mods actively protected posts featuring violence from being taken down. Or WhatsApp verified known child abusers and drug dealers.
 
Last edited:

The Name of Love

Far Right Nutjob
Facebook is well known for its complicity in (((them))) installing America's puppet dictator [sincere] that's exactly what they're doing.[/s]
Nah, if anything (((they))) are actually at war with Facebook. I mean, George Soros was calling for Mark Zuckerberg's job, and Sacha Baron Cohen wants the social media companies' heads arrested for "hate speech."
 

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
@Random Username
I mean, I get that social media services have a general problem enforcing even basic legality standards because of how big they are.

But PornHub actually profited from and encouraged the child rape to happen on their platform. They knowingly verified a trafficked fifteen-year old girl on their platform to feature in porn videos. They have entire sections on their website dedicated to "Teens" with titles including “Young Girl Tricked,” “Innocent Brace Faced Tiny Teen F---ed,” “Tiny Petite Thai Teen,” “Teen Little Girl First Time,” on and on ad infinitum. Just read the article they posted.

To give you a comparison, imagine if Facebook mods actively protected posts featuring violence from being taken down. Or WhatsApp verified known child abusers and drug dealers.
If they are that's the job of law enforcement and the authorities to deal with.
Facebook is well known for its complicity in (((them))) installing America's puppet dictator [sincere] that's exactly what they're doing.[/s]
Aren't they in bed with China or was that Google?
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
Given how ineffectual our politicians are and how much they love pornography? Probably never.

Probably the moment these guys are in power

images


Then it’s the DARK WEB

images


ALL THE WAY

Odds are though, they’d probably be aware and secretly engaging in it themselves whilst going on and on, violently talking about “virtue” and persecuting “suspects” whilst being horrible sexual predators themselves
 

The Name of Love

Far Right Nutjob
Probably the moment these guys are in power
Maybe. If Muslims do take over America, that'd be one silver lining. Of course, we'd have to deal with increased rape gangs, but perhaps the authoritarian Islamic state would better control those sex pests than our ineffectual liberal government.
 
D

Deleted member 88

Guest
Islam has its own sexual degeneracy hidden beneath the veneer of puritanism. Pederasty, homosexuality, bestiality and other such perversions exist in the Islamic world often on quite a large and even semi tolerated scale.

The problem when dealing with a vice like pornography is as I have said before the lack of a universally agreed value system. It has to be imposed upon people who disagree forcefully. Which is a recipe for disobedience and eventual defeat.

The way you get rid of pornography ultimately is to remove the need or urge that gives it a market. Either by sex bots or other means of giving people "real" means to satisfy their urges, or changing people's character and behavior at a fundamental level so either they discipline themselves or don't have these urges anymore.

The former brings its own problems, and the latter is a tall tall order.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top