Philosophy Thoughts on Friedrich Nietzsche?

[Dauerschriff]

Greek and romans were the antic world. What is Christianity at core if not a divergent cult of Judaism?

The Kuran is the Word of God, written in one language, by one Man, whether or not it is true is irrelevant, there is strong coherency, within the origin writter Muhammad. It is a very Arab faith at core value.

How many times the Pope had to change the wordings of the prayers over underlining meaning? How many times the question of Jesus nature and the Holy Spirit arose (like Alexandria School vs Antioch) divided? the question of idols? Icons? of saints? .
To believe the Pope is not a politician is properly insane. How many Oekunemical councils over time?

Lutherianism launched a mass movement of literation (the process of learning to read) to understand the text and not the church. Lutherianism dies because... Northern Europe dies.

There is a saying translation is treason for a reason. Any text translated has loss coherency and is worse shifted by the translator.

However i reacted to Christianity and Nieztsche, he defined nihilism very uniquely like embracing weakness and reveling in it (unlike pure materialism which is more commonly accepted of nihilism), which is what i recall from him. A man of his time true to Schopenhauer teachings, but more action inclined in text (he became pretty sick all his life after joining a war if i remember). Glorified life and deeds over piousness or empty musing, because he was denied that.
Given Fascism appreciation of forms over deepness, his cult of action and heroism was logically appreciated, but he was not antisemitic racially.

 

[ATP]

Greek and romans were the antic world. What is Christianity at core if not a divergent cult of Judaism?

Judaism is cult of Jahve who care only about jews,but is not their Father.
Chrystianity have God who is Father for everybody.They are not the same religions.

The Kuran is the Word of God, written in one language, by one Man, whether or not it is true is irrelevant, there is strong coherency, within the origin writter Muhammad. It is a very Arab faith at core value.

And was written 200 years after machomet died,becouse in his times arabic language do not existed yet.They speak arameic.

How many times the Pope had to change the wordings of the prayers over underlining meaning? How many times the question of Jesus nature and the Holy Spirit arose (like Alexandria School vs Antioch) divided? the question of idols? Icons? of saints? .

They were resolved when they come.First christians simply do not think about that.

To believe the Pope is not a politician is properly insane. How many Oekunemical councils over time?

Lutherianism launched a mass movement of literation (the process of learning to read) to understand the text and not the church. Lutherianism dies because... Northern Europe dies.

Lutheranism turned chrystianity into part of state,and pastors are not priests,but state officials.It died as religion with Luther death,after that it was tool of rulers.

There is a saying translation is treason for a reason. Any text translated has loss coherency and is worse shifted by the translator.

Or,that translations are like womans - they could be either beautiful or faitfull,but never both.

However i reacted to Christianity and Nieztsche, he defined nihilism very uniquely like embracing weakness and reveling in it (unlike pure materialism which is more commonly accepted of nihilism), which is what i recall from him. A man of his time true to Schopenhauer teachings, but more action inclined in text (he became pretty sick all his life after joining a war if i remember). Glorified life and deeds over piousness or empty musing, because he was denied that.

possible.

Given Fascism appreciation of forms over deepness, his cult of action and heroism was logically appreciated, but he was not antisemitic racially.

Of course,and even if he was,it would not matter - becouse for him humans should do whatever they want,which mean that his example mean notching for other superhumans.
Becouse they would do what they want to anyway.

 

[King Krávoka]

Nietzsche saw a troubling feature in the current European culture and moral sense in his time.
That every assumption of 'fairness' and 'good behavior' were ultimately cemented in God, a God men were rejecting.

When he says 'God is dead and men killed him', what he means is that Men rejected the basis of their entire moral sense at that point and had no strong foundations beyond 'yes' (which...is not a good argument at all).

I'm not seeing it. There is no such thing as a moral code that is dependent on higher beings, only prejudices about the one that a righteous one would use. If you met one tomorrow then you wouldn't automatically revise it on whatever they said, you'd use your prejudices first to decide if they are right to obey, and then respond to it according to those prejudices. No one in the world really uses 'God told me so' as their moral compass, the line of causality is always backwards, without exception. People believe in gods that agree with the values that were imparted on them by either tradition or reason. Not necessarily good ones. And none of this has anything to do with the question of God's existence, at all.
... Oh, I see it now. One would figure out that most institutions were now self-aware that people blindly accepted moral codes from them, without needing anything higher than such authority to validate them, and these institutions would revise theirs to be perfectly beneficial to them alone. He foresaw all of the material religions that would drive the world wars and onward.

 

[King Krávoka]

I finished reading On the Geneology of Morals so that I would have a license to keep using "slave/master morality" in conversation. That was a mistake because Nietzsche expected me to read his earlier works as well as Kant, while enduring his very annoying style of writing. I've heard of the other driving idea before but I rejected it out of hand because it was being used as a justification for instituting a neopagan monarchy (castrate monarchs).

I personally didn't find the book itself that shocking or blasphemous except when he started to edgelord, and you know that Freddy is going to edgelord as a matter of habit. There was a part of it in the ending that I probably did need to read about five or seven years ago. He explained that fascination with the cosmos is a kind of penance that makes the worst and most famous kind of Atheist when it becomes their driving virtue, and all their erratic behavior is the result of constantly torturing themselves with the conclusion of their worldview.

I think that he did a better job than most religious fundamentalists of explaining why Atheists are a religion, of course they're not going to cite Nietzsche and especially not his explanation for why it's the fault of their forebears' dehumanized concepts of God. They were hard at work with removing Human "weaknesses" from their description of God, to make Him into a better metaphor for the government, until they added things like "consciousness" and "existence" to that list.

There are two ways to read "nothing is sacred". The Atheist Community is obsessed with outer space because it is their God, their ultimate perfect being, and their existence is a sin against it, which will be rectified by inevitable reunion with it. They don't even identify with the stars in a photograph of space, only the vast distances that it shows. Misotheistic behavior is natural when believing in such a horrifying deity.

 

[Dauerschriff]

Nietzche is good to describe the morality of resentment and the priest-class:

- I am weak, and powerless hence i am good. Many more are like me and will like the message, allowing me to gain their favor by appeasing their wounded egos. I will preach to the powerful they should be like us and surrender their power to me, the pope. Overtime, generations after generations, especially on the children it will work.

It is basically a psyop.
Shame he had not access to modern studies on why banning cousin marriage of any degree in the west has nothing to do with consanguinity, but to break down tribes and clanics structures, that impeded the Church power, weath and influence, that ultimately became the modern State system.

Possibly a reason why judaism has been so successful, in christian land for so long, is because is what not so influenced by the attempt of the church so centralize power through cultural indoctrination.

 

[Dauerschriff]

translations are like womans - they could be either beautiful or faitfull,but never both.

Just read it. Can i steal it (mentioning you of course) for my signature?