The politics of Birth Control

Emperor Tippy

Merchant of Death
Super Moderator
Staff Member
Founder
Saw this article on Bloomberg.

Better Birth Control Could Exist said:
Since the contraceptive pill transformed women’s lives almost 60 years ago, there’s been precious little innovation in birth control for women. Now a company in San Diego claims to be on the verge of something that could advance the field: a gel women can apply an hour before sex, without having to mess with their hormones. “There hasn’t been innovation in this category in decades,” Evofem Biosciences Inc.Chief Executive Officer Saundra Pelletier says. “It’s time that women have the opportunity to have sex on demand, like men have had with condoms for years.”

The reason there aren’t more and better options for women is simple: money. In the era of $20 billion blockbusters such as the arthritis drug Humira and $2 million-a-patient gene therapies to treat rare diseases, the pharmaceutical industry doesn’t see a big payoff in rolling out products that don’t have record-breaking potential. Bayer AG’s Yaz family of medicines, one of the best-selling lines of birth control pills, generated about $1.4 billion in revenue at its sales peak. Evofem estimates its birth control gel could top out at just under $1 billion in annual U.S. sales. “Pharmaceutical companies don’t really see the benefit,” says Emma Gargus, who leads contraceptive projects at Northwestern University’s Woodruff research lab.

This sentiment can’t override that pharmaceuticals companies will never be able to sell birth control drugs at anything like the prices they get on new treatments for cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, obesity, or heart disease, lowering interest in reproductive health medicine.
“The pill is as cheap as chips,” says Anna Glasier, honorary professor at the University of Edinburgh. “So everything has to be not much more expensive than that.”

I still want to know when a safe, effective, pill for men will be developed and hit the market. Because assuming one was made, you could probably have most of the US's adult male population willing to take one every morning for breakfast.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
Saw this article on Bloomberg.



I still want to know when a safe, effective, pill for men will be developed and hit the market. Because assuming one was made, you could probably have most of the US's adult male population willing to take one every morning for breakfast.

Sadly once you do have the pill for men you can bet a bunch of feminsts will try to get it banned because they think its sexist for men to have that kind of control over their own bodies.

Most people of course will think their crazy and once the science proves its good its going to go through but they will add a few more years to the wait.
 

Es Arcanum

Princeps Terra
Founder
From personal experience I reckon a lot of women would still prefer to take the pill because it messes with their hormones, heavy menstruation is annoying for them.

And a male contraceptive pill is a much bigger ask than a female one. The female one takes advantage of an already existing biological mechanism in female biology to stop the one ovum from doing its thing.

Any male pill will either have to A) Target the sperm... all several million of them, not even one can get past B) Ensure that any sperm that does get through and fertilises an ovum is healthy (retard babies would be a no go) and C) Not kill the pleasure of the experience for the male. Which sadly the drugs that lead to 'dry' ejaculations are said to have done.

But yeah, if they can solve those issues and its healthy without serious side effects then I'm all for it.
 

Yokkiziikzekker

Well-known member
What about someone else's body?
Nope, not if that body is attached to a biological system attached to your body. Whether it is or not is irrelevant if the STATE/FEDERAL GOV'T IS INVOLVED. In my beliefs anyway. I feel the same way about guns, you should be allowed access to them if needed. If you're consolidating all of the guns into the hands of the police/state or eliminating all access to safe abortion, you're doing the extremists' work for them.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
Ain't a child until it's born.

I suppose the indigenous Americans weren't humans until they converted to Catholicism, either? Please, now, it's one thing to advocate for abortion, but it's rather ridiculous to seriously assert that a person isn't a person until a certain stage of their life. The genes have been selected, the combinations made, the organism grows, lives. She is a child. You can support abortion anyway, and I do respect Paglia for doing so after looking at that unflinchingly, but it is a fact--this kind of sophistry is a pablum, an opiate for the masses so they will accept mass abortion.
 

ReeeFallin

The Yankee Candle
I suppose the indigenous Americans weren't humans until they converted to Catholicism, either? Please, now, it's one thing to advocate for abortion, but it's rather ridiculous to seriously assert that a person isn't a person until a certain stage of their life. The genes have been selected, the combinations made, the organism grows, lives. She is a child. You can support abortion anyway, and I do respect Paglia for doing so after looking at that unflinchingly, but it is a fact--this kind of sophistry is a pablum, an opiate for the masses so they will accept mass abortion.
I suppose by the third miscarriage if you saw a clump of fertilized cells as a fully realized person you'd go totally fucking insane.

But, I don't, and haven't.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
I suppose by the third miscarriage if you saw a clump of fertilized cells as a fully realized person you'd go totally fucking insane.

But, I don't, and haven't.

I will pray for you. I am so sorry, and I know these words will not mean much. Miscarriage is one of those matters where we may only have faith for a divine plan, and confidence that those taken from us before we know them are especially cared for by the Almighty. I cannot imagine facing that without religion; it would be for a braver person than I.
 

Edgeplay_cgo

Well-known member
Saw this article on Bloomberg.



I still want to know when a safe, effective, pill for men will be developed and hit the market. Because assuming one was made, you could probably have most of the US's adult male population willing to take one every morning for breakfast.

It's a bit academic for me. I got the snip, some 45 years ago. But I don't see that a male pill is any different, morally, from a female pill.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top