Progressive Civil War: George Soros Demands Mark Zuckerberg's Job!

[The Name of Love]

Apparently, George Soros just wrote a piece in the New York Times calling for Mark Zuckerberg to be removed from his job! Unreal!

It really makes you wonder if the Left is warring with Silicon Valley at this point. This story, combined with earlier mumbling from the ADL (seen here and here) really makes you wonder if there's a civil war starting to brew between the Left-wing Jewish Identitarians who want to ban "anti-Semitism" from the Internet and Silicon Valley types that kind of just want to make money off of stealing your data.

Really makes ya think, eh?

 

[Cherico]

Ok speaking as a jew here.

FUCK Soros.

That ass hat sold his fellow jews down the river during the second world war, the state of Israel has formerally told him he is not welcome there.

He represents the jewish community in the same sense as benedict arnarld represents America, as much as quisling represents Norway, as much as Judas represents Christianity. The man has caused huge amounts of human suffering, and has been rightfully banned from ever going to several countries.

I consider him to be a traitor and I loath the man.

Fuck him.

 

[PsihoKekec]

Well, the tech industry is going to learn the moral of the scorpion and the frog fable the hard way.

 

[Lanmandragon]

Ehh bound to happen they turned on Messiah Obama so why not tech?

 

[CarlManvers2019]

It’s happening, upper class businessmen finding that pandering to the WOKE crowd isn’t just bad for business, it’s BAD for business

Especially when they start calling for THEIR heads and taking THEIR wealth and business

 

[Cherico]

It’s happening, upper class businessmen finding that pandering to the WOKE crowd isn’t just bad for business, it’s BAD for business

Especially when they start calling for THEIR heads and taking THEIR wealth and business

the moment those upper class businessmen who fund this shit find out that no one is safe is the moment we win.

 

[PsihoKekec]

However it is common state of mind for people to assume that even when no one is safe, they themselves are the exception.

 

[Cherico]

However it is common state of mind for people to assume that even when no one is safe, they themselves are the exception.

good governance is built on the corpses of billions of shattered delusions.

 

[CarlManvers2019]

the moment those upper class businessmen who fund this shit find out that no one is safe is the moment we win.

Didn’t you once say that #MeToo was something that hit the Business Democrats?

It’s hitting even famous celebrities like Johnny Depp now

Course guys like Ewan McGregor don’t have a problem interacting and working with affirmed predators and abusers

 

[Basileus_Komnenos]

Course guys like Ewan McGregor don’t have a problem interacting and working with affirmed predators and abusers

What are you referring to here? I haven't really followed Ewan McGregor since he acted in the Star Wars Prequels.

 

[CarlManvers2019]

What are you referring to here? I haven't really followed Ewan McGregor since he acted in the Star Wars Prequels.

From what I know, he worked with some guy named Roman Polanski, someone even BBC had issues with and is a sex criminal

Okay, admittedly not really sure on its full validity or when he made whatever film was before or after finding out

Honestly, I prefer my celebrities just be guys in movies rather than being a bunch of weirdo tryhards IRL that pretend to be so relevant

Point is, I’m pretty sure much of Hollywood and other celebrities and businessmen may actually be in the know of each other’s horrible shit and engaged in it themselves....yet they have the gall to pretend to be so offended and righteously against it all

It’s only a matter of time that the “revolution” they supported but never thought would come for them, goes after them. Though, I doubt many expected the Left to go that crazy and actually target them.

 

[Tryglaw]

the moment those upper class businessmen who fund this shit find out that no one is safe is the moment we win.

Well, it's well established that revolutions devour their "parents", as revolutionaries turn on each other in factional struggles. Happened to French, with broadly applied "close shave" courtesy of the guillotines, happened to Bolsheviks, as it was said "Silence! Now speaks Comrade Mauser*".

*the Mauser broomhandle gun being favorite tool for executions.

 

[Arch Dornan]

Ok speaking as a jew here.

FUCK Soros.

That ass hat sold his fellow jews down the river during the second world war, the state of Israel has formerally told him he is not welcome there.

He represents the jewish community in the same sense as benedict arnarld represents America, as much as quisling represents Norway, as much as Judas represents Christianity. The man has caused huge amounts of human suffering, and has been rightfully banned from ever going to several countries.

I consider him to be a traitor and I loath the man.

Fuck him.

From his actions he acts like a racist carticature of the internet meme spread around the internet being a billionaire with money he uses to fuck countries over for his ambitions.

Netanyahu's son Yair was internet savvy to use that comparison with his own shitpost on twitter.

 

[PsihoKekec]

If there was competition for person that best enmbodies all the Stürmer stereotypes about the Jews, soros would have won, hands down, especially since Berezovsky is dead for some time now.

 

[The Name of Love]

I think what we see happening is an intersectional civil war on the Left. See, Left-wing ideology would be very much poised to tackle "Jewish privilege." The majority of POCs either hate Jews or don't care; Jews are, on average, wealthier than most POC and Europeans; and then there's all the nonsense involving Israel and the Palestinians, which has been a major part of the Left for a while. Jews are able to keep their place in the intersectional coalition because 1) rich Jews fund Leftist causes, 2) MUH HOLOCAUST! and 3) OH LOOK OVER THERE, WHITE PEOPLE!

But the logic of intersectionality is unavoidable, and I think it's only a matter of time before Jews get kicked to the back of the line, so to speak. I think these sort of unreasonable demands by Jewish identitarian groups like the ADL (an organization founded to protect Leo Frank, a confirmed pedophilic rapist-murderer who happened to be Jewish) as well as people like George Soros are the dying gasp of this part of the intersectional left.

 

[Marduk]

Not unrelated:

Facebook refutes Soros claim of a 'special relationship' between Trump and Zuckerberg

Facebook on Friday issues a statement renouncing recent allegations by liberal financier George Soros that there is a "special relationship" forming between the social media company and President Donald Trump.

www.cnbc.com

Zuckerberg says Facebook must stand up for free speech

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said during a speech Friday in Utah that he doesn’t want his platform to be used to “rip society apart” but that at some point the social media company must stand up for free speech.

www.washingtontimes.com

Now that makes sense. Zuckerberg, probably seeing the numbers, the threat of GOP cracking down on shenanigans after the election, and the press, decides to side with the free speech faction for now, as opposed to the deplatforming the right - after all, he's doing business with the Trump campaign, so some backroom talk may have happened. Then suddenly Soros jumps out of the bushes and makes makes angry faces at him!

Also ADL has undergone a typical case of "formerly respected organization taken over by leftist activists for own purposes". It's not as obvious as with others, as it was somewhat "liberal" skewing with its nature in the past, but it did happen, sometime around 2015. Now ADL is, in general, more concerned about supporting the left than "Jewish identitarianism".

The ADL’s Islamophobia hypocrisy - JNS.org

The group’s opposition to Mike Pompeo was a function of partisanship, not principle.

www.jns.org

Point in case: ADL would rather recycle CAIR talking points and complain about "islamophobia" than support an extremely pro-Israel Trump nominee:

Most troubling about the ADL’s Islamophobia argument against Pompeo is that it echoes the criticisms of the Council on Islamic American Relations, better known as CAIR. The ADL has specifically slammed CAIR in the past for its equivocal stands on terrorism, pointing out that it began life as a front group for fundraisers for Hamas in the United States. Yet now it joins with them in attacking Pompeo.

 

[The Name of Love]

Also ADL has undergone a typical case of "formerly respected organization taken over by leftist activists for own purposes". It's not as obvious as with others, as it was somewhat "liberal" skewing with its nature in the past, but it did happen, sometime around 2015. Now ADL is, in general, more concerned about supporting the left than "Jewish identitarianism".

It's an organization that was evil from the start. It was created to prevent criminals from being punished on the grounds that said criminals were Jewish.

 

[LordSunhawk]

Ummm... point of order, it is generally accepted that Leo Frank was innocent of the crime, and the actual killer was James Conley (the janitor), among those who believe Conley did it was his own lawyer. Going over the evidence in the case, if I'd been a juror I'd have had a very hard time voting to convict Frank, because the evidence against him was either highly circumstantial or outright contradictory.

 

[Marduk]

It's an organization that was evil from the start. It was created to prevent criminals from being punished on the grounds that said criminals were Jewish.

TBH you could find a lot more leftie organizations that could be accurately described in a sentence starting with "It was created to prevent criminals from being punished on the grounds that..."