Important OK, A Serious Announcement

[Knowledgeispower]

Well, thank fuck I missed this piece of drama. Child porn is something you can never put enough bolter rounds in.

More like a heavy flammer but yes this is true

 

[Agent23]

Well, thank fuck I missed this piece of drama. Child porn is something you can never put enough bolter rounds in.

On the one hand, somebody really needs to report that shit.On the other, it is damnit evidence against Sloppy Joe Jr.

I can't believe that bastard isn't somebody's prison bitch already.

 

[Sergeant Foley]

From what I know, which is not much since I did not see the actual post since everything was handled after it was all done. Wolfbear posted a picture from Twitter allegedly from Hunter Biden's laptop of a child that was inappropriate. Then the mods saw it and nuked it, and banned wolfbear.


Some people are dumb and don't have common sense, they just copy what they see from facebook, or twitter?

I was wondering what happened to Wolfbear.

 

[Ricardolindo]

@WolfBear just told me his ban has been made permanent. He said the moderators told him he could appeal but he asked me to ask how he can do that if he is banned.

 

[TheRejectionist]

Sorry to tag you @Bacle but didn't Wolfbear had posting that bordered on mad scientist stuff like eugenicism and other bad crap ?

 

[LordSunhawk]

He just has to attempt to create the thread in the appeals forum. Nothing fancy

 

[Ricardolindo]

He just has to attempt to create the thread in the appeals forum. Nothing fancy

Thanks for the reply. I will tell him.

 

[Bacle]

Sorry to tag you @Bacle but didn't Wolfbear had posting that bordered on mad scientist stuff like eugenicism and other bad crap ?

Yeah, yeah he had for quite a while, almost since he first signed on.

It felt like half his posts were about 'ensuring good genes' in whatever topic or subject he was involved in.

Also had a bad habit of making completely off-topic posts in thread because he wanted to have a debate without making a new thread, preferring to hijack existing threads with bait posts or something barely related that allowed him to push his Mengele-lite crap.

 

[Ricardolindo]

Yeah, yeah he had for quite a while, almost since he first signed on.

It felt like half his posts were about 'ensuring good genes' in whatever topic or subject he was involved in.

Also had a bad habit of making completely off-topic posts in thread because he wanted to have a debate without making a new thread, preferring to hijack existing threads with bait posts or something barely related that allowed him to push his Mengele-lite crap.

FYI, @WolfBear is Asperger's.

 

[Bacle]

FYI, @WolfBear is Asperger's.

That's not an excuse to ignore the rules that he has, repeatedly, or for repeatedly trying to change thread topics to his eugenicist shit anytime the fancy struck him.

 

[Ricardolindo]

That's not an excuse to ignore the rules that he has, repeatedly, or for repeatedly trying to change thread topics to his eugenicist shit anytime the fancy struck him.

Yes, but as a fellow Asperger's, I understand him. Still, he did break the rules way too many times. He was actioned 18 times.
As for eugenics, while I strongly oppose it, doesn't this very right-wing forum support it?

 

[Bacle]

Yes, but as a fellow Asperger's, I understand him. Still, he did break the rules way too many times. He was actioned 18 times.

He didn't want to learn, it seemed, and he just kept trying to push the limits.

I've been stuck with the same diagnosis years ago when it was still a distinct thing under the old medical jargon, and guess what, just because I can understand where WolfBear's eugenicist bullshit might come from, does not mean I approve of it or the repeated attempts to hijack thread topics to push eugenicist type debates.

As for eugenics, while I strongly oppose it, doesn't this very right-wing forum support it?

Uh no, why would you think a 'Right Wing Forum' would support eugenics?

That's like thinking the worst strawmen of the Right that the Left put's forward are 100% true.

 

[Ricardolindo]

He didn't want to learn, it seemed, and he just kept trying to push the limits.

I've been stuck with the same diagnosis years ago when it was still a distinct thing under the old medical jargon, and guess what, just because I can understand where WolfBear's eugenicist bullshit might come from, does not mean I approve of it or the repeated attempts to hijack thread topics to push eugenicist type debates.

Agreed.

Uh no, why would you think a 'Right Wing Forum' would support eugenics?

That's like thinking the worst strawmen of the Right that the Left put's forward are 100% true.

It's generally the alt-right, who believe in the IQ and race theories, who support eugenics.

 

[TheRejectionist]

Yeah, yeah he had for quite a while, almost since he first signed on.

It felt like half his posts were about 'ensuring good genes' in whatever topic or subject he was involved in.

Also had a bad habit of making completely off-topic posts in thread because he wanted to have a debate without making a new thread, preferring to hijack existing threads with bait posts or something barely related that allowed him to push his Mengele-lite crap.

FYI, @WolfBear is Asperger's.

That's not an excuse to ignore the rules that he has, repeatedly, or for repeatedly trying to change thread topics to his eugenicist shit anytime the fancy struck him.

Frankly I do not think we are able to verify that he is because....well, we are on an internet forum, and not gonna pretend from someone to identify himself with the risk of doxxing, swatting or worse. Also rules are rules as said by @Bacle . First time I got banned from the Ukraine thread.

I could be saying something "tin-foil-hat-ish" but he does seem to belong to this neologism :

Urban Dictionary: Glowing

1) (in real life) To give off some form of positive energy through vibes, beauty, etc. Most often used to describe how the person is perceived visually, like a smile but not something like a compliment. 2) (in internet culture) a) To be close to or to break the TOS of a social media site in a...

www.urbandictionary.com

2) (in internet culture)

a) To be close to or to break the TOS of a social media site in a way that is eye catching to some. Especially used if the action that caused the user to glow is something the community they are a part in often get criticized for.

b) To be suspected of being a federal agent who is either trying to infiltrate or provoke online communities. Often posted when an account is found to have doctored photos, made up first and last names, and/or relatively extreme ideas. Possibly a reference to the quote, "The cia ******* glow in the dark."

Yes, but as a fellow Asperger's, I understand him. Still, he did break the rules way too many times. He was actioned 18 times.
As for eugenics, while I strongly oppose it, doesn't this very right-wing forum support it?

Agreed.


It's generally the alt-right, who believe in the IQ and race theories, who support eugenics.

We are free to discuss it and make post it about. What this forum is lets you have your opinion unlike alternatehistory.com or others.

BUT FOR FUCK SAKE HOW CAN YOU SAY WE SUPPORT IT ?

Nor we are a rightwing forum. You can express it freely as you, you can notice that I am free to express my viewpoints and be rebutted by @S'task @Battlegrinder @Marduk @ATP @Batrix2070 and so on and I don't fit into the 2 genders of politics that the mainstream teaches to the youth.

Marduk and ATP think I am leftist for instance.

Just saying, don't put a label on (now) over 2000 members.

We are dissidents at worst.

We don't buy into the festering, fraudelent and degenerate and anti-working class bullshit they have been peddling us for the past decade and contaminating (or attempt to contaminate) even un-political hobbies such as videogaming, wargaming, going to the gym to be healthy or going outdoors !

 

[Ricardolindo]

We are free to discuss it and make post it about. What this forum is lets you have your opinion unlike alternatehistory.com or others.

BUT FOR FUCK SAKE HOW CAN YOU SAY WE SUPPORT IT ?

Nor we are a rightwing forum. You can express it freely as you, you can notice that I am free to express my viewpoints and be rebutted by @S'task @Battlegrinder @Marduk @ATP @Batrix2070 and so on and I don't fit into the 2 genders of politics that the mainstream teaches to the youth.

Marduk and ATP think I am leftist for instance.

Just saying, don't put a label on (now) over 2000 members.

We are dissidents at worst.

We don't buy into the festering, fraudelent and degenerate and anti-working class bullshit they have been peddling us for the past decade and contaminating (or attempt to contaminate) even un-political hobbies such as videogaming, wargaming, going to the gym to be healthy or going outdoors !

I asked it in question form as I wasn't sure.

 

[King Krávoka]

It felt like half his posts were about 'ensuring good genes' in whatever topic or subject he was involved in.

The horrid politics would be forgiveable, or grudgingly tolerable, or an unavoidable aspect of the website's purpose, if they weren't obviously another vehicle for his emasculation fetish.

 

[Bacle]

It's generally the alt-right, who believe in the IQ and race theories, who support eugenics.

Uh, no, that bit of insanity is not isolated to the Right, the Left just hides the same sort of racial animus under the 'Equity' arguments and the racism of low expectations.

The racists on the right do tend to have more of a leaning towards eugenicist and racial IQ argument, the same stuff a lot of the Left believe but do not voice the same way.

Expecting a Right Wing forum to support eugenics and racial IQ type arguments is a sad statement on how the politics and public image of the Right are still burdened with the dark legacy of the Southern Strategy and of how modern racists find it easier to infil/expect welcome into the Right.

Of course I won't deny that it does very much seem that there is a subsection on the fringe of the Right, typified by Nick Fuentes and people who buy his sorts of arguments/buy 'racial IQ arguments', and WolfBear very much seemed like another of those sorts with a lot of the arguments and rhetorical approaches he favored.

And not understanding/following the NSFW rules, which are pretty fucking plain and easy to understand, along with ignoring the mod directives about any content from the Hunter Biden laptop, are all on him.

The horrid politics would be forgiveable, or grudgingly tolerable, or an unavoidable aspect of the website's purpose, if they weren't obviously another vehicle for his emasculation fetish.

...I'm not even sure how to respond to this, because it implies a larger context I lack.

 

[Ricardolindo]

Of course I won't deny that it does very much seem that there is a subsection on the fringe of the Right, typified by Nick Fuentes and people who buy his sorts of arguments/buy 'racial IQ arguments', and WolfBear very much seemed like another of those sorts with a lot of the arguments and rhetorical approaches he favored.

@WolfBear is left-wing on many issues but he believes in the IQ and race theories and supports voluntary eugenics.

 

[Bacle]

@WolfBear is left-wing on many issues but he believes in the IQ and race theories and supports voluntary eugenics.

Horseshoe theory in action.

 

[Ricardolindo]

...I'm not even sure how to respond to this, because it implies a larger context I lack.

I never saw his posts about it here but @WolfBear was obsessed with being sterilized as he doesn't want to have children.