Looking for Mods

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
How did that rule come about? Who decided on it and why? It seems really arbitrary. What was the reasoning given?

Something to ask on SB, not here. It's their policy apparently. I thought there was crossover with SV AFAIK though.
 

Emperor Tippy

Merchant of Death
Super Moderator
Staff Member
Founder

John Masaki

Jedi Knight
Hmph. I suppose if it came down to SB or Sietch, SB would probably come first, as it was the first of all the forums that I basically lived in. Ah, well. I'm okay with being a humble poster.
 

Gastaph Hediatrix

Fabricator-General of Mars
Founder
So what would being a mod here entail?

BEHOLD, FROM THE DISTANT PAST OF PAGE 1:

Hmm, true.

Staff Roles:
Moderators: Act on the minor matters and recommend more serious punishments.
Super Moderators: Oversee the moderators (and review their actions), and act on the more serious matters (which includes anything with permanent consequences for a user).
Admins: General forum management, oversee all Appeals.
Empress_Zoe: Oversees the Admins, is the only authority that matters on ToS issues, approves permanent bans for non Spam accounts.

---
Let's see.
-User reports are anonymized to the Moderators and all infraction messages are anonymized as coming from "The Moderation Team".

This is to cut down on potential bias issues in both directions.

-The only punishments that Mod's can issue are threadbans (duration is at their discretion) and one or three day subforum bans. They are the first view on reports and if they feel that a more serious/long term punishment is warranted then they are supposed to recommend that to the Super Moderators.

-Once a Mod has issued a warning, resolved a report, or recommended escalation their role is done.

-SMod's review Mod actions and handle the issuance of more permanent penalties.

-Appeals are public and are handled by the Admins (generally as a group). If you are appealing short duration thread bans or the 1/3 day subforum bans then you generally better be able to show that the Mod was pretty much egregiously wrong, otherwise the Admin's may well hit you for harassing them and find you guilty of wasting the courts time. Generally the more significant/longer lasting the punishment the more you can get away with in an appeal.

-Zoe can override the Admins if she feels clemency is warranted, has the final say on all permanent forum bans, and is the sole judge on ToS issues.

---
To sum it up, as a Mod your job is to deal with the Report queue in the first instance, set an example for the rest of the forum members on how to behave, and to tell people/threads to cool off when they are getting close to the edge (or give them a time out if they cross the line).
 

Nagaasha

Active member
I wouldn't mind moderating. I have a pretty good record on SB. My only question is time commitment. Obviously I would check my inbox for any reports assigned to me and address them in a timely fashion.

Also, how easy is it for a mod to see a given poster's warning/infraction history? I feel like that would be an important tool.
 

Nagaasha

Active member
This seems kinda risky just on its own without vetting. You need some form of system in which you can validate who or who is that person on SB.

Because having some option in which anyone can become mod overnight on here reeks of infiltration risk.

I have the same username on every forum I join, so everyone knows who I am.

It has come to our attention that while one is allowed to be staff on both SB and SV, one is not allowed to be staff on both The Sietch and SB.

So fair warning if you have some faint hope of becoming SB staff someday you probably shouldn't apply here.
eh, I was never going to be an SB mod anyway (nor would I want to).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top