Breaking News January 6th Stop the Steal Rally & Capitol Breaching/Storming

DarthOne

☦️

Jack Posobiec

@JackPosobiec
·10h

BREAKING: AOC admits Capitol Police held the doors open on Jan 6
 

DarthOne

☦️
LEAKED EMAIL Sent to The Gateway Pundit from The Unselect Committee to January 6th Defendant!! Proof the Committee and the DOJ Are EXTORTING Testimonies Out of Their Witnesses! LIZ CHENEY IS SHAMELESS!!


The desperate Unselect Committee is using unethical if not possibly illegal measures to secure favorable witness testimonies from persecuted January 6th Defendants that have pled guilty, such as their witness Stephen Ayres that testified yesterday.

Liz Cheney alleged that Trump personally reached out to a witness who has not yet testified. The truth is the JANUARY 6TH COMMITTEE IS REACHING OUT TO DEFENDANTS TO TESTIFY BEFORE THEIR SENTENCING! How is this legal?

This email below was released to The Gateway Pundit by a January 6th Defendant that pled guilty but is awaiting sentencing. It was sent to the defendant by James Sasso, Investigative Counsel for “The Unselect Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on The United States Capitol”. See the email here:

IMG_8093-3.jpg


The recipient of this email wishes to remain anonymous as they are fearful of retaliation by the Government when sentenced. We blacked out information to protect their identity.


This is the statement of the individual who forwarded this email to us:

“The Committee wants me to apologize for being there, they want me to apologize for speaking out on my opinion on the matter. I just can’t do that. That would be a lie. The only advantage for doing that is if I can avoid some kind of harsh sentencing which is coming up. If I don’t play ball with them I fear they will be retaliate, there will be a consequence for it.”

Logically, these cornered defendants would feel immense pressure to give the Unselect Committee the answers they want to hear “in exchange” for a favorable sentence, whether they are true or not. How can this Committee present these compromised witnesses to the American public as credible when they know they are not? The game plan all along was to viciously persecute American citizens and ultimately use them to keep President Trump from getting elected again. The Biden Regime has men still locked away in pre-trail solitary confinement, torturing them until they crack and give them what they want.

“The fact that the January 6th Committee is using convicted defendants awaiting sentencing as witnesses against President Trump to corroborate their claims is unethical, predatory and dishonest,” said top J6 Attorney Joseph McBride. “There is no difference between the Committee’s actions and a hostage held by terrorists at gunpoint being forced to read a letter from his captors saying they are “good people”. Its is deeply disturbing, morally bankrupt and profoundly anti-American.”

Stephen Ayres, a witness the Unselect Committee called yesterday, spoke about this experience on January 6th in front of the Kangaroo Court. Ayres testified he did not plan on marching to the Capitol, but that former president Donald Trump got “everyone” riled up and urged them to march. After traitor Liz Cheney asked him “Do you still believe the election was stolen?”, the clearly emasculated Ayres made a face and choked out “Not so much now.” Ayres then went on to hug crying Capitol cop Michael Fanone and friends and “apologized” to them in front of flashing cameras.

Ayres pled Guilty to disorderly conduct this past June 8th. He was originally charged with Aiding and Abetting, Entering or Remaining in an Official Building or Grounds, and Obstruction of an Official Proceeding 1512(c)(2) which alone holds a maximum of a 20 year sentence. He wound up plea bargaining with the Regime to the simple charge of Disorderly Conduct. All other charges were dropped. Here is Ayres’ Criminal Complaint and Arrest Warrant.

It is notable that Ayres is the Co-Defendant of Matthew Perna, the January 6th Defendant who committed suicide this past February 26th in desperation after he pled guilty to the very same charges that Ayres had dropped- including the Obstruction of an Official Proceeding 1512(c)(2). Here is Ayres and Perna’s Indictment. **Perna is “Male 1” in Ayres Criminal Complaint.

Apparently a terrified Ayres thought it wiser to sign a plea deal and appear before the nation to denounce Trump then face the same fate as his co-defendant and pal Michael Perna, whose family says he is dead because of his political persecution by Biden’s Justice Department. He signed his plea deal only this past June 8th.

The difference in outcomes for two men on the same exact Indictment is remarkable. The first man, Perna, signed a plea deal last December.

According to an article by Julie Kelly,

“Matthew Graves, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia handling every January 6 prosecution, intervened and asked the court to delay Perna’s sentencing so his office could make sure Capitol defendants are punished equally. “While every case and every defendant are different, the Government is attempting to ensure that similarly situated January 6 defendants are treated in the same manner,” Graves wrote in a motion on February 11. “The Government is attempting to do that in this case and that requires additional time for the Government’s internal review process to be completed.”

Graves’ office has sought lengthy prison terms for defendants who plead guilty to the obstruction felony. In the case of Jacob Chansley, who, like Perna, committed no violent act on January 6 and was allowed into the building by police, Biden’s Justice Department sought 51 months in jail and three years probation. (Judge Royce Lamberth sentenced him to 41 months.)

In sentencing recommendations on obstruction pleas, prosecutors have compared defendants to domestic terrorists and asked judges to act accordingly. “The need to deter others is especially strong in cases involving domestic terrorism, which the breach of the Capitol certainly was,” one of Graves’ prosecutors wrote in Chansley’s sentencing memo. “The sentence of this Court must drive home this fact for this defendant, and any others who may wish to emulate him: crimes committed against this country and democracy will be prosecuted and punished in accordance with the law.”

That appears to be what Graves would have demanded in Perna’s case as well.”


In the case of Ayres, the three more serious charges were dropped, including the feared Obstruction of an Official Proceeding 1512(c)(2) felony charge. He was offered a simple Disorderly Conduct plea deal and was featured on National TV yesterday as a star witness for the January 6th Unselect Committee. It is logical to assume he will receive no jail time when sentenced.

One must wonder if Michael Perna was approached by the January 6th Committee before he committed suicide.

“They are using witnesses that have a gun to their head, for lack of a better term,” said Tina Ryan of Citizens Against Political Persecution. “The entire operation warrants a real independent federal investigation into the tactics and extreme measures the January 6th Committee is using to obtain witnesses that will cooperate with their agenda.”
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder


Not surprised by this, after all we've learned about Milley's actions around Jan 6th and everything after the church photo-op he hated Trump for.

Edit: This is also related to the Schiff amendment they are trying to pass, restricting Congress's ability to oversee military action on US soil:
 

Cherico

Well-known member
Shift has clearly proven to be a problem and a threat to our republic.

We do need to investigate his crimes and charge him for them.
 

DarthOne

☦️
Another January 6th Defendant Dies by Suicide


January 6th Defendant Mark Aungst died awaiting sentencing on July 20th, with the death being ruled a suicide by the coroner

By late June, roughly 840 patriots had been arrested for demonstrating at the Capitol on January 6th. Over 300 of these individuals had been brow-beaten into pleading guilty to crimes as heinous as trespassing at our sacred temple of Democracy, with 80 of those receiving jail time. Many arrested and charged with crimes are still rotting in prison under inhumane conditions.

One of these individuals, Pennsylvania man Mark Aungst, pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor for which he faced up to $5,000 in fines and six months in prison and died on July 20th while awaiting sentencing.

Marking the third suicide by a January 6th defendant, Mark Aungst’s death was ruled as such by a coroner.

Aungst, 47, is survived by his mother, daughter, and three siblings.

He and a companion, Tammy Bronsburg, were tried for entering the Capitol and faced charges of parading or demonstrating inside a restricted building, disorderly conduct in a restricted building, entering or remaining in a restricted building, and disorderly conduct in a Capitol building. Upon a guilty plea to the first of these “crimes,” the other three charges were to go away during sentencing. However, this still left Aungst’s life ruined as he faced up to $5,000 in fines, six months in jail, and almost certainly no way of being employed again.

The extreme mistreatment in custody of January 6th defendants, coupled with the harsh sentencing for crimes that should not even be crimes, has forced several defendants to take their own lives.

This is not about any semblance of justice or security, but instead a petty crusade by the establishment and the Democrats.

The January 6th defendants are “used as pawns to dangle in front of [Americans] to show that if you cross a certain line, if you support a certain president—as in President Donald Trump—or if you dare to speak up against the government or … against an election being stolen, you’re going to be used,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said during a speech.

She was absolutely correct.


Besides creating martyrs against them, I think the Deep State is going to find that all this will accomplish is people fighting to the death rather then going quietly.
 

DarthOne

☦️
'I Hope It Doesn't Get to That': Cheney Confirms Who the J6 Committee May Subpoena Next


During an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) confirmed the January 6 Committee’s next target: Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife.


Cheney, who is vice chair of the committee, said they’re currently in talks with Thomas’s counsel and they may subpoena her if she doesn’t cooperate.

The committee is supposedly seeking more information about Thomas’s communication as a private citizen with former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, among others, about continuing to fight to overturn the 2020 election results.

"Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, repeatedly corresponded with then White House chief of Staff Mark Meadows and Trump lawyer John Eastman, who was pushing this deranged theory," CNN host Jake Tapper said Sunday on "State of the Union."

"She was writing to them about efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, not to mention her correspondence with Arizona lawmakers pushing fake electors," Tapper continued. "Is your committee planning on talking to Ginni Thomas, even though her lawyer has expressed a reluctance to cooperate?"

Cheney confirmed they are.

"We certainly hope that she will agree to come in voluntarily,” she said. “But the committee is fully prepared to contemplate a subpoena if she does not. I hope it doesn't get to that. I hope she will come in voluntarily. We've certainly spoken with numbers of people who are similarly situated in terms of the discussions that she was having that you've mentioned. So, it's very important for us to speak with her. And as I said, I hope she will agree to do so voluntarily. But I'm sure we will contemplate a subpoena if she won't."

In a letter to the House select committee last month, a lawyer for Thomas said he "does not believe there is currently a sufficient basis to speak with" her. He also expressed concern that the sole reason she was being asked to speak with the committee was "to continue the baseless harassment she has been subjected to since January 6."

The Wall Street Journal's editorial board, meanwhile, believes it's not about Ginni at all, but rather is an attempt to 'trash' Justice Thomas.

[C]ommittee member Adam Schiff gave away the real game, as he often does. Asked Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation” if this would set a “dangerous precedent,” Mr. Schiff went to the heart of his political goal:
“In this case, for Clarence Thomas to issue a decision, in a case of dissent, in a case where Congress is trying to get documents, and those documents might involve his own wife, that’s the line that’s been crossed. And I think, for Congress to be looking into these issues, looking into conflict of interest issues. But here, looking into issues whether it involves the wife of a Supreme Court justice or anyone else, if they have information or role in an effort to overturn an election. Yes, they’re not excluded from examination.”
Mr. Schiff is referring to a January dissent by Justice Thomas in a case involving Mr. Trump’s attempt to block Congress from obtaining certain documents. Justice Thomas was the lone dissenter and offered no explanation. Mr. Schiff is implying that Justice Thomas was deciding based on the views of his wife or to help Mr. Trump, though he has no evidence for the charge.
That’s the kind of innuendo Mr. Schiff specialized in during the Russia collusion probe, when he was caught making claims supposedly based on classified information that turned out to be false. Ms. Cheney keeps telling Republicans they ought to believe the committee’s findings, and much of that is compelling. But Mr. Schiff’s attempt to use a spouse to smear the reputation of a Supreme Court Justice will cause many to discount the entire effort. (WSJ)
Thomas's lawyer also suggested in the letter that the real target may be Ginni's husband, pointing to "some animus" displayed toward the justice by Chairman Bennie Thompson, who referred to him as an "Uncle Tom" in 2014 for his views. He never backed down from that comment.

"These statements by the Committee's Chairman certainly raise alarm bells when the Committee says that it wants to speak with Mrs. Thomas," Thomas's attorney wrote, underscoring "larger concerns" about the committee's fairness.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top