Cancer and the ailments that follow it (or even treatment for it) are garbage, and it will be a wonderful day when its various forms go the way of the dodo because of scientific advancement and nobody has to suffer that bullshit. In some ways perhaps it's a relief to the family since I imagine they've had this exact fear hanging over them for months now (perhaps even longer--I forget how long Ginsburg has been in poor health or beset by various complications and issues) and so perhaps had some time to prepare for it and come to grips with the matter...But at the same time, it can never really be accounted for or dealt-with like that, either.
Death sucks.
On other, less important but sadly more pressing matters to the broader country...20/20 hindsight to some extent, but also not since it was said even before now, but politically and in terms of...the health of the Republic...Ginsburg retiring under Obama so her replacement could be nominated would have been a far, far less dangerous route to take than waiting and then the four-year game of chicken that's been played with death through Trump's presidency.
'Twould also be healthier for the Republic if SCOTUS were not the boss-level battleground for partisan ideology and agenda it's been turned into over the course of the last...decades...to the point where it has become such an electoral fight, but that ship sailed long ago and requires a bipartisan consensus on its danger and ill-suited nature to questions of governance which no longer exists because of the ship having set to sea.
I hold little hope of any rise above partisan desires occurring. Ginsburg's final statement somewhat pours gas on that fire in a manner that is...decidedly irresponsible for a public figure (once more Trump's superpower of making others behave as atrociously as him manifests itself I presume).
Hopefully the Republic gets through without any more interesting times.
Well, I'm going to have to be a bit reptilian on this.
This was not a surprise. This isn't a situation where a SCOTUS gets laid low by some unforeseen event. Ginsburg was clutching onto her power with her last dying breath. Maybe she sees that as heroic, it certainly seems that others do. I personally don't. She should have given up her seat during Obama's two terms, when he could have appointed a moderate or left leaning judge to replace her. Instead, she chose to hold onto her position. And sure, Trump won. And we all know why she wouldn't want to let Trump choose her successor.
Her choice to remain in power was a political choice. Therefore, I see no foul in Trump making a political choice and replacing her before he has a chance to lose his seat. Because it is the exact same thing she was hoping to do to him. The only difference is that she lost. And now the Republicans have two major reasons to replace her before the election.
1) The Democrats will use this as a rallying call to get the SJWs, feminists, and so on into the voting booths, instead of just rioting. They could actually use this as a call to arms. The idea that it will benefit Trump to keep the seat open because it will allow him to rally his own base, is a mistake I think. Rather, I think it's to avoid the appearance of being callous so shortly after her death. Instead, I propose that replacing her before the election will not only rob the Democrats their call to arms, but also give a large moral boost to his own base.
2) In the case where Trump is defeated, he's already lockdown the Supreme Court. Because right now, the Republicans hold the Executive, the Judicial, and half of the Legislation. Worst case scenario, the Democrats might take back the Legislator, the Executive, and push back in the Judicial. In this way, Trump has at least locked in one branch of power. More optimistically, even if Trump loses, the Republicans can retain the Senate and SCOTUS. More optimistically (and perhaps, realistically I would argue), it would mean that Trump would lead the Republicans to dominate SCOTUS, hold the Executive for 4 more years, possibly hold the Senate, and with luck, win back the House. We could be talking about a near-lock on all branches of government on the federal level for the next 2 years.
The Democrats, specifically Democrat leadership, is already openly talking about doing this, and openly courting the military to support them in a coup.
That's either delusions of grandeur or posturing.
First, Washington, Oregon, and California lack the military heft to secede from the Union. Second, if they did, they would quickly collapse into shitholes, because all those countries need federal money. Especially after they went and burned down a shitload of their own businesses and infrastructure. Third, the eastern half of those states would immediately want to rejoin the USA. The core concept of Left Coast identity is on the coast, not in the more sparsely populated eastern areas of those states. Fourth, the moment they're out of the USA, Trump can legally use sanctions and tariffs to destroy their economy. Permanently. Companies like Google can either move back into the USA or be completely and utterly replaced by competitors. Imagine the sort of world California becomes when it can't sell digital services to the rest of the country, Hollywood can't sell its movies, and lack the means of feeding themselves without the American heartland.
You do not seem to understand, that once the conflict has risen to this level, you do not de-escalate, until your opponent is defeated. The Democrats have made it abundantly clear that they will continue to up the ante until such time as they win. They do not care how much they have to cheat, how much they have to lie, how many people have to die, how many lives they have to ruin, in order to get back in power.
The Democrats do not have the means of achieving this, regardless of who wins this election. And any attempt to do so will destroy them in the next rounds of electoral battles. This is the desperate scream of a party that is trying stave off its demise. You don't try and change the nature of how power is distributed in a country, unless you are either consolidating power or you're about to lose it. And the Democrats are certainly not consolidating power.
You do not 'de-escalate' when your enemy has already started the war.
More importantly, in a political struggle with two divergent factions, you do not hand a political win to your enemy, because they martyred themselves for their own gain.