Five minutes of hate news

mrttao

Well-known member
No, how we end up with drag queen story hour is thanks to power pedo's like Epstein. Biden, Weinstein, and friends, along with the fucking doctors making bank off tran-ing people.
The LGBTQP alliance is the very foundation of normalizing grooming and pedophilia.
And don't pretend that LGBs are not out for grooming too.
They reproduce via recruitment
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
The LGBTQP alliance is the very foundation of normalizing grooming and pedophilia.
And don't pretend that LGBs are not out for grooming too.
They reproduce via recruitment

To be fair, some of the LGBs are very much trying to break away from this crap and make at least an attempt at a moral stand.

Unsurprisingly, they're getting the same treatment they helped give the right for decades beforehand.

Pederasty and Pedophilia have always been linked to the LGBT movement, and though how tightly has waxed and waned over the decades, the link will never wholly disappear, because it comes from the same philosophical root.

"I will redefine right and wrong based on what I want to be true, rather than what is actually true."
 

mrttao

Well-known member
To be fair, some of the LGBs are very much trying to break away from this crap and make at least an attempt at a moral stand.

Unsurprisingly, they're getting the same treatment they helped give the right for decades beforehand.

Pederasty and Pedophilia have always been linked to the LGBT movement, and though how tightly has waxed and waned over the decades, the link will never wholly disappear, because it comes from the same philosophical root.

"I will redefine right and wrong based on what I want to be true, rather than what is actually true."
Sappo the Schoolmistress (630 to 570 BC)
The very origin of the term Lesbian.
She was an older woman born to wealthy parents, she ran a school that gave her access to little girls for her to molest.
She then wrote poetry about her actions
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
The LGBTQP alliance is the very foundation of normalizing grooming and pedophilia.
And don't pretend that LGBs are not out for grooming too.
They reproduce via recruitment
Sappo the Schoolmistress (630 to 570 BC)
The very origin of the term Lesbian.
She was an older woman born to wealthy parents, she ran a school that gave her access to little girls for her to molest.
She then wrote poetry about her actions
Given I am a B, I do not take kindly to being called a 'groomer' just because some pedo parasites have tried to hijack the movement.

There are plenty of us trying to fight this stuff from the inside, and idiots like you make it that much harder by conflating every LGB person with 'groomers'.

And do not forget T's have tried to actively erase B's from the discourse, because being bi implies understanding their are only two sexes, not this 'genderfluid shit' that has come out recently.

But nah, go ahead and treat every non-hetero as a 'groomer', I'm sure it be great for preaching to a smaller and smaller choir.

And lesbians existed long, long before humanity ever left Africa, so Sappo is hardly the foundation of lesbianism.

Like, do you not get that this sort of overreach/backlash against all LGBs is exactly what the Dems and trans-pushers love, because it helps prove their points about how they have to keep the whole movement as protected classes, just so people on the Far Right don't try to force lobotomies on them again.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
To be fair, some of the LGBs are very much trying to break away from this crap and make at least an attempt at a moral stand.

Unsurprisingly, they're getting the same treatment they helped give the right for decades beforehand.

Pederasty and Pedophilia have always been linked to the LGBT movement, and though how tightly has waxed and waned over the decades, the link will never wholly disappear, because it comes from the same philosophical root.

"I will redefine right and wrong based on what I want to be true, rather than what is actually true."
You're also forgetting the LGB who disassociated themselves from the movement a long time ago, once it became clear how it wanted to treat people now that it had power; the one's who's philosophical roots were more "I just want to be left alone, and not have to worry about getting metaphorically or literally lynched by people who think what I'm doing (with consenting adults) is wrong, when I'm not hurting anyone".
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
You're also forgetting the LGB who disassociated themselves from the movement a long time ago, once it became clear how it wanted to treat people now that it had power; the one's who's philosophical roots were more "I just want to be left alone, and not have to worry about getting metaphorically or literally lynched by people who think what I'm doing (with consenting adults) is wrong, when I'm not hurting anyone".

Who gets to define 'hurt?'

Does the unrepentant alcoholic think he's hurting himself?

Does the unrepentant druggie think he's hurting himself?

I won't try to force someone not to hurt themselves (unless they're my child or similar), I believe that people have stewardship over their own lives and own bodies, but I won't lie about it being healthy or normal.

People like Dave Rubin, I'd say have an unfortunate unhealthy habit, but are still clearly functional members of society. That doesn't change the fact that they're lying to themselves about what is right and wrong, and that the same lie they use (I get to define morality) is what pedophiles use to justify themselves.

The pedophile is far more heinous, because they're preying upon children, absolutely. Adults mutually messing themselves up is sad, but I don't believe it should be criminal. The thing is the same justification for trying to force normalization and affirmation of homosexuality, is the justification used for normalizing and legalizing pedophilia.

Individuals may not choose to take the line of logic as far, but it's still the same line, cut off at a less disastrous but still destructive point.
 

mrttao

Well-known member
And lesbians existed long, long before humanity ever left Africa, so Sappo is hardly the foundation of lesbianism.
I said "origin of the term" not "the foundation of lesbianism".

Homosexual women had the idiotic idea of naming themselves after a famous child groomer.
Homosexual men had the brains to actually call themselves "happy people".
Given I am a B, I do not take kindly to being called a 'groomer' just because some pedo parasites have tried to hijack the movement.
1. As a non groomer you are in a minority.
2. Your movement is all about enabling the groomers.
You yourself are not a groomer, but you are supporting them from the sidelines.
But nah, go ahead and treat every non-hetero as a 'groomer', I'm sure it be great for preaching to a smaller and smaller choir.
Quite the opposite. The choir is getting bigger and stronger by the day.

At some point you have to realize that your "tribe" is not representing you.
My own tribe (jews) seem to be 90% made up of retards or actively malicious people who are doing everything in their power to make people hate them.
Actually those two tribes are very closely connected too. Shocking amount of overlap.

Also, I didn't say that every single alphabet person is a groomer without exception. I said the movements are the foundation of groomers, and inevitably lead to groomers. because most are groomer.
That is the dirty little secret. The non groomers are a minority.

Alphabets were protected from persecution in the western world before the entire movement started.
The movement's goals were:
1. "marriage" (aka, the right to adopt children. aka groomer).
2. access to children. (being teachers, making cartoons, etc). aka grooming.

We were promised that this was totally not grooming. just "love"
Well, we all saw it isn't. fool me once shame on you. fool me twice shame on me.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
1. "marriage" (aka, the right to adopt children. aka groomer).
And right here you show the ignorance of what the actual issues spurring same-sex marriage actually are in the US.

Hint, it has more to do with insurance, hospital visitation rights, and legal paper work for things married hetero's take completely for granted.

The painting most LGBs as "using/wanting it to adopt and 'groom' kids", instead of just be able to visit their partner if they've had a stroke or left them money via life insurance, is falling for internal Right-wing propaganda and not actually looking at what issues spurred SCOTUS to rule on the issue in the first place.

The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution and it's ramifications for legal paperwork and benefits are why the issue ended up in the courts, when some states would not honor out-of-state same-sex marriage licenses.

Also, do you realize that for a long time in the US admitting to being non-hetero could mean being forcefully lobotomized? Like, do you get how hard it is to report pedo abuse inside the LGBs, if even admitting to being LGB was effectively a death sentence.

That culture of fear of reporting abuse in the LGBs was there for a long time, and the only reason we are in a position to deal with the pedo's now, and inform the public about them in a way the public may believe, is because LGB protections and same-sex marriage removed a lot of the impetus of that fear that had lingered on, and meant hetero's no longer had to fear defending non-hetero friends in court or in public.

However, trying to push a backslide of removing same-sex marriage and LGB protections will only backfire on the Right, and spur more things like this legislation to ensure that any protections LGBs have today will be their in the future and help enable overreach in that regard.

Learn to understand the other sides actual motivations, not just the Right-wing propaganda version that plays well in echochambers.
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
Learn to understand the other sides actual motivations, not just the Right-wing propaganda version that plays well in echochambers.

You presume that such people are being honest about their motivations. As a hint, look to their actions and the consequences.

Some, like Dave Rubin or Charles Murray, show that they mostly want to be left alone. I can tolerate that.

Most, including those in control of the lobbying groups, pressure groups, HR departments, universities, and large chunks of the Democrat Party, are after nothing less than total normalization of whatever sexual deviancy they please.

I have some respect for movements like the LGB alliance, who have broken away from the progressive orthodoxy to try to put some kind of limit on things.

That's not the majority of the movement, not even close.
 

mrttao

Well-known member
Hint, it has more to do with insurance, hospital visitation rights, and legal paper work for things married hetero's take completely for granted.
Those are blatant fucking lies

I still remember how all the news were all going about on how "poor gay guy denied hospital visiting rights"

The actual story was... gay guy gave his boyfriend drugs, the boyfriend ODed on said drugs and went into a coma.
When the boyfriend went to the hospital he met the family there. The actual family complained to the hospital that the boyfriend is a complete stranger harassing them. So security removed him.

That was your grand "no visitation rights" moment.
That was about the only time in the USA a gay was actually "denied hospital visitation".

Hospitals allow anyone to visit. The only time you are asked to leave is if the current visitors are the proven blood relatives and ask you to leave

As for legal paperwork and insurance... that is there for the children's sake.
Which are not an issue here.

You are assuming I am ignorant of the LGBTQP actual arguments. as if I lived in a cave or something.
I am not, I heard them when they were brought up and I fell for those lies.
But they have since been proven to be lies. Those claimed "real reasons" turned out to not be the real reason after all. The real reason was proven to be access to children.

Ooops. My bad, I fell for alphabet lies. But now I am correcting my stance
Also, do you realize that for a long time in the US admitting to being non-hetero could mean being forcefully lobotomized?
"long time". lobotomy was only a thing in USA for a very short period.
And was used on everyone for every reason imaginable.

Also, immediately harkening to "waaah waaah I am a victim".
As if this justifies grooming.
 
Last edited:

The Immortal Watch Dog

Well-known member
Hetman
The sodomites proved over the past few years that the bible was right about them. I might be an atheist, but I can admit when I was wrong and the bible was right.

And you are wrong, supporting same sex marriage is exactly how we ended up with drag queen story hour.

MLK warned about this six decades ago, early in his life he gave speeches about how he thought a gay illuminati was trying to destroy the Black and white races by feminizing men and even used the term "the eternal sodomite"

I used to make fun of that position as fucking insane and schizoid but...

To be fair, some of the LGBs are very much trying to break away from this crap and make at least an attempt at a moral stand.
"

Based gays and bisexuals have always been waging a war on the freaks in their community and the pedos from outside.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
As if this justifies grooming.
Nothing I said was about justifying grooming, and it is obvious you are not actually going to engage in good faith with what I actually say, rather than rant about most LGBs being groomers.

The majority of this nation are not going to play that game, and the more you push 'LGBs are all groomers' as opposed to 'groomers have latched onto LGBs like a parasite', the harder it will be to stop shit like the lies T's and the people who profit off Ts, push.
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
Nothing I said was about justifying grooming, and it is obvious you are not actually going to engage in good faith with what I actually say, rather than rant about most LGBs being groomers.

The majority of this nation are not going to play that game, and the more you push 'LGBs are all groomers' as opposed to 'groomers have latched onto LGBs like a parasite', the harder it will be to stop shit like the lies T's and the people who profit off Ts, push.
Yup.

I know plenty of gay/lesbian people. And all of them are against the groomer shit and a lot are against the Trans insanity.

You can tell some of these people have never had much exposure to just normal gay people.

The loud ones on the internet are forming most of these people's jusgement. In reality, they have a lot of varying political views. They just get shut out of internet discussions or just don't go arguing like that on the internet for fear of repercussions.

If you asked my best friends who are a lesbian couple who they voted for, they'll tell you they just voted R down ticket to keep their guns and to fight against sexualizing children in school, but they were reluctant about it because of the conservatives wanting to ban same sex marriage. Think about how many votes we could pick up if we just stopped trying to stop gay people from getting married?

Trans stuff? Ask them how many genders there are? Two.

They don't post about it online, though. I can see why too, because when one of them shared a DeSantis quote on FB, it was an absolute shit show. So when you're online you get a full dose of the crazies. They really are crazy. They are only a section of the lgb community.

Gay people are just people who like the same sex. They're fine. Get over it. Focus on the groomers and lunatic trannies.
 
Last edited:

The Immortal Watch Dog

Well-known member
Hetman
The one thing I remember about the gay marriage decision and I've brought it up before when @Abhorsen made a thread about this.

Was that all the rich progressive lesbians started sounding like hardcore MRA Bros. Because for years their corporations created bonuses and benefits that simulated the marriage tax breaks for LGBT people.

And with the decision those companies all announced on the same day that they weren't gonna do that anymore.

So places like NPR were filled with them all "oh great now I'm actually gonna have to marry my partner to get any benefit and now she can divorce me and take half my shit". :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

So much for the great civil rights strides. To the assholes at the top at least. It was all about money.
 
Last edited:

Robovski

Well-known member
Back more than 20 years ago I was for people being able to marry/partner another consenting adult as a point of personal liberty. I'm not gay, but I do not think that the State can or should dictate who I can "marry". I don't care about their relative genders, I don't care if they have sex or not, I don't care about their ages so long as they are both legal adults and are mutually agreeing to marry/partner. I and you reading this, and whomever else out there should be able to decide who they want to live their life with and who is their partner. And if we were all just living in cabins in the 19th century this wouldn't be a problem but as this was the 20th and now is the 21st century, people have health benefits, pensions, bank accounts and a plethora of other legal issues that arise when you are NOT married to the person you spent 10 years living with and calling husband/wife/life partner. As such, they need a legal recognition of that status so the hospital/life insurance/bank et al will recognize them as next of kin ect... Most gay people don't look like the prominent freaks you see and just want to live their lives like anyone else.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top