Eating every part of the chicken. And I mean every part, so long as it's mashed up and processed.
Maybe it's just a hang up I and others in the UK have. shrug
Five minutes of hate news
- Thread starter PsihoKekec
- Start date
Maybe it's just a hang up I and others in the UK have. shrug
Bigking321
Well-known member
It's not like people know it's happening. They just get some fried chicken bits that taste ok and say 100% chicken.
If people watched the whole process there would probably be more push against it.
But as the saying goes, don't try and find out how the sausage is made, just enjoy having a tasty sausage.
Considering how traditional sausages are/were made... Yeah, good call.
Man you really do not want to look up chitlings and how those are made.
Fact is when people are poor, don't have a lot of cash and want quick meals for their kids well you look the other way about stuff. Its not high quality of course but it does the job.
mrttao
Well-known member
with companies using high pressure to strip all the meat from chicken bones to produce a pink paste which they then bake into nuggets.
its just steam and meat paste. it is perfectly fine. I don't see why people are freaking out about it.
what is NOT fine is that they then bread it, the breading has a bunch of chemicals added to it, and then they deep fry it in toxic oils like soy oil
mrttao
Well-known member
it is NOT every part of the chicken.
they remove the head, feathers, wings, legs, internal organs, and skin.
all that is left is bones, meat, fat, blood, and connective tissue.
Then they use high pressure steam to strip every scrap of flesh from the bones. leaving only clean bones and a red paste (flesh, blood, fat, and connective tissue) which is formed into nugget shapes.
Also, I should note this is an argument for the sake of accuracy. I do actually eat some internal organs and the like, they are quite healthy.
I just disagree with you that those nuggets are made out of every part.
Vyor
My influence grows!
If they're using soy to fry it they've done something very wrong. Mcdonalds uses a canola and sunflower oil blend for a reason.
mrttao
Well-known member
I meant in general. not McDonnalds specifically.
As I am sure this kind of meat paste seperation is used by other companies too.
If we are talking about McD. they switched from tallow (healthy) to canola & sunflower oil blend (not as good). but lately they apparently have started mixing in and/or switching to palm oil, allegedly. according to sus sources
What Kinds Of Oil Does McDonald's Use In Its Food? - Daily Meal
Generally speaking, there are two different types of oil you might find in your food when dining at McDonald's, but it depends what you order.
www.thedailymeal.com
palm oil is the cheapest oil in the world... that said, it isn't nearly as bad as soy oil.
I mean, Grandpa liked chicken feet.
In any case, can you guys maybe take the food discussion to the food thread?
Vyor
My influence grows!
Not at all surprised. The UN is used as cover by those who regularly commit Crimes Against Humanity.
The fact they have countries which regularly treat women like shit on the UNHRC, and that the Blue Hat peacekeepers have been found regularly to be fucking kids in Africa and the Middle-East says it all.
There is a sort of perverse incentive for bad actors to buy themselves into such "humanitarian cred" organizations. After all, for first world countries stuff like "don't do slavery" is kinda obvious, if anything they are taking human rights too far in the other direction, and so they have no special interest in taking or bribing off such positions.
OTOH countries where this is an actual problem have a meaningful incentive to take some sort of control of organizations to use them to fix up their poor reputations and cover for their unsavory actions.
Kinda like a company making great products that are world famous for their quality doesn't need to bribe journos and set up whole "independent" NGOs for the industry just to give them quality certificates...
While a company that does have dodgy quality standards and has no intent to fix those may well have reasons to do all of the above.
SoliFortissimi
Well-known member
It's the same fucking logic which incentivizes pedos to become priests. Nobody who matters would ever suspect a "Man of God" to be a pedo, would they?
mrttao
Well-known member
I lost count of the number of time UN "peacekeepers" were caught operating a rape camp.
Doomsought
Well-known member
Its the UN working as intended. The UN has one purpose: bring objectively evil nations to the negotiation table in order to prevent nuclear war. I for one take the extreme opposite position, that based on the rapid recovery of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, compared to the lasting damage left behind by even defunct communist regimes, the damage that would be done by nuclear war is overblown and far exceeded than the damage which has already been done by the concessions made to communists in order to avoid it.
mrttao
Well-known member
hiroshima and nagasaki were nuclear fission weapons.
nobody was hit with nuclear fusion weapons which are more than 1000x stronger than nuclear fission bombs.
we call both nuclear weapons but there is no comparison.
back in the day, before some non proliferation programs, multiple nuclear powers each had enogh nuclear bombs to completely wipe out humanity. multiple times over. even if some lands are spared direct glassing, they would experience nuclear winter.
the USA even started construction of project sundial. a fusion bomb so large that when detonated will destroy all of humanity. a final "doomsday" threat. that weapon would not be delivered but detonated directly in USA inside the facility where it was built.
before cooler heads prevailed and told them to scrap the project.