Five minutes of hate news

Well, fuck Erdogan again.



Fuck also his lackeys in North Cyprus :



From Lebanon with "love" in Australia. Now, I know plenty of Lebanese in Brazil and Italy. None are like these shitheads.



Meanwhile "Syrian" jihadists seem intent on annexing Lebanon as well. Well fuck them.



In Brazil, Moraes, the Supreme Federal Tribunal :



ENOUGH! Alexandre de Moraes sentenced the husband and father of 6 children to 14 years in prison and blocked the mother's salary.

Vanessa begged on her knees to the new president of the chamber, Hugo Mota.

It is unthinkable that, in a civilized country, six children would go without FOOD by ORDER OF ONE MAN.

In the last two years, the Lula government, the STF, and their allies have made decisions that represent a true assault on human dignity, real crimes against humanity.

Those who condone this national tragedy should be held criminally accountable for it.
 
Why they doing it?
Islam?
Muhamad did hate dogs and said they are unclean by sharia law.

From this website :


A dog can be owned for purposes such as the following:

  • A trained dog for hunting. Remember in Islam we are only allowed to hunt for food; there is no such thing as hunting for fun, for we are not allowed to kill or torture animals or drive them out of their habitats for the fun of it.
  • A trained dog as a guide. This would be the case if a person is blind and he/she has no choice but to keep a dog for essential services. In this case, it is permissible for him/her to keep a dog inside the house once it has been trained for service, but it is still recommended that the dog have its own sleeping arrangement.
  • A dog trained for police duties.
  • A guard dog to guard houses or property.
  • A dog used by farmers to shepherd cattle and sheep.
We are, however, not allowed to keep a dog as a pet, since it is not a very clean animal. How often have you come across the nasty sight of dogs taken for a walk licking their own excrement? Isn't it disgusting to see their owners kissing the mouth of such animals after such incidents as if nothing happened?

However this website also said :


Muslims all over the word are led to believe that the dog is a dirty animal and that the mere touching of a dog would void the wudu (ablution) and infect the one who touched it with 'nagasah' (dirty impurity)!

This non Quranic concept comes from a number of hadith. It is claimed that prophet Muhammad ordered the killing of dogs and gave numerous hadith that prohibit the keeping of dogs except for hunting and guarding, due to their dirty properties!

By studying the Quran we find no such truth. Nowhere in the Quran are dogs prohibited, nor is there any mention of any contaminating effect of these lovely animals who are man's best friend. Consequently, we must dismiss all these hadith that fabricate lies against the prophet.

1- God tells us in the Quran about the story of the Companions of the Cave (Surah 18). In verse 13 God tells us that they were good believers and that God guided them. In verse 18 God tells us that they had their dog with them.

If dogs were prohibited and dirty, would God speak of the Companions of the Cave (who had a dog) as good believers?

2- Traditional Muslim scholars claim that the saliva of the dog contains contamination. In 5:4 God tells us that it is okay to eat what the trained dogs catch (dogs are used in hunting). If the dog is an animal which causes contamination by mere touch, would God tell us that it is perfectly alright to eat what the dog catches with his mouth (let alone just touch the dog)?

3- The Quran contains a very important rule for all believers, and the rule is:​

Nothing is haram (unlawful) unless it is prohibited by God Himself, and since God describes the Quran as complete, perfect and fully detailed, thus all the prohibitions decreed by God are found in the Quran. The following Quranic verses confirm this truth:


Shall I seek other than God as a lawmaker, when it is He who has brought down to you the Book fully detailed?" 6:114


Do not utter lies that are portrayed by your tongues: "This is lawful and that is unlawful", to fabricate lies and attribute them to God. Those who fabricate lies and attribute them to God will not succeed. 16:116

There is not one verse in the Quran where God prohibits the keeping of dogs, nor that dogs are dirty animals causing contamination.

4- Is it logical that God would create an animal to be man's best friend and serve him in many ways, and then prohibit us from keeping such an animal?

5- If this is what the Quran tells us about dogs, where does the prohibition of dogs come from? Where do the claims about contamination from dogs come from? As most other corruptions which have crept into Islam, the source is always the fabricated hadith which are falsely attributed to prophet Muhammad!​

Hadith tell us that the prophet prohibited the keeping of dogs as pets. Other hadith tell us that angels won't enter a room where there is a dog. Other hadith tell us that if we touch a dog our ablution is void and we become impure, and that we have to wash seven times to clean this impurity, the final time in dust! Other hadith go even beyond that to say that we must kill all black dogs!

The following are some examples:

Malik's Muwatta, Book 54, Number 54.5.13:



"Malik related from Nafi from Abdullah Ibn Umar that the messenger of God ordered all dogs (other than sheepdogs or hunting dogs) to be killed".



Ibn Hanbal's collection: The messenger of God said:



"You shall kill all black dogs, because they are devils."



The questions that arise by reading such hadith are:
Did the prophet really issue these prohibitions?
Did the prophet have the authority to issue these prohibitions?

The answer is given in the Quran:

"O you prophet, why do you prohibit what God has made lawful for you, seeking to please your wives? God is Forgiver Merciful. 66:1

God did not include the words in 66:1 in the Quran to belittle the prophet in our eyes, but these words are placed in the Quran in order to confirm to all believers, across all times, that the prophet of God does not have the authority to prohibit anything which is not prohibited by God. God is the only Law Maker (6:114) and the only duty of the messenger is to deliver God's message (5:92).

The outcome of the above analysis is that we must discard all the lies attributed to prophet Muhammad regarding prohibiting dogs. We must be focused on the Quran as the only source of guidance and religious law.

Also these answers here :


So, maybe, yes and no or with asterisk somewhere*.

@mrttao however, I have been to Turkey (why the fuck autocorrect gives Türkiye, I am not going to entertain that Erdoganist fantasy) twice in my lifetime. I have yet to meet one who thinks it is "ok" to kill one because it is stray. Even in mosques. The dogs would enter pretty much anywhere and wouldn't bother anyone nor they would bother anyone.

And UNLIKE Brazil (as always ask @King of Light or @gral for confirmation) I haven't heard or seen (or worse, in my case, almost suffered if it wasn't for my mother's maternal instincts being stronger than the animal) a dog attack.
 
Well, fuck Erdogan again.



Fuck also his lackeys in North Cyprus :



From Lebanon with "love" in Australia. Now, I know plenty of Lebanese in Brazil and Italy. None are like these shitheads.



Meanwhile "Syrian" jihadists seem intent on annexing Lebanon as well. Well fuck them.



In Brazil, Moraes, the Supreme Federal Tribunal :


If Assad hasn't helped defeat the Christians in Lebanon they would probably stand a better chance
 
Well, fuck Erdogan again.



Fuck also his lackeys in North Cyprus :



From Lebanon with "love" in Australia. Now, I know plenty of Lebanese in Brazil and Italy. None are like these shitheads.



Meanwhile "Syrian" jihadists seem intent on annexing Lebanon as well. Well fuck them.



In Brazil, Moraes, the Supreme Federal Tribunal :


As a dog and cat lover, this infuriates me to an undescribable degree.
 
Well, fuck Erdogan again.

As a dog and cat lover, this infuriates me to an undescribable degree.
So...this MAY be just muslim hate for dogs. If it is...well, look to this as how you'll be treated if you likely be let muslims control your government.

What I will say is that stray dogs and wild dog packs can be a threat.

Eastern Europe, especially what used to by Yugoslavia, performed dog-cullings twice a year. Government would award you 50 euro a head for wild dogs killed in specific times.

Reason: wild dogs would take down children and small adults. There were a LOT of wild dogs because of all the strife. Once they got to be part of a pack, it doesn't matter how nice that dog was once the pack got hungry. They'd attack whatever they could catch. I don't trust dogs in any number greater than 2.

I don't know if this is what Erdogan is doing, but it's a thought in the back of my head.
 
So...this MAY be just muslim hate for dogs. If it is...well, look to this as how you'll be treated if you likely be let muslims control your government.

What I will say is that stray dogs and wild dog packs can be a threat.

Eastern Europe, especially what used to by Yugoslavia, performed dog-cullings twice a year. Government would award you 50 euro a head for wild dogs killed in specific times.

Reason: wild dogs would take down children and small adults. There were a LOT of wild dogs because of all the strife. Once they got to be part of a pack, it doesn't matter how nice that dog was once the pack got hungry. They'd attack whatever they could catch. I don't trust dogs in any number greater than 2.

I don't know if this is what Erdogan is doing, but it's a thought in the back of my head.
Honestly its probably part of both.
The unspoken part is that when "based Serbia" does it for example, certain people don't care so much.
Or especially when Armenia does it:

Certain other people care when Russia does it.

And locals tend to care about consequences of not doing anything:

Just an average third world moment.
 
Last edited:
So...this MAY be just muslim hate for dogs. If it is...well, look to this as how you'll be treated if you likely be let muslims control your government.

What I will say is that stray dogs and wild dog packs can be a threat.

Eastern Europe, especially what used to by Yugoslavia, performed dog-cullings twice a year. Government would award you 50 euro a head for wild dogs killed in specific times.

Reason: wild dogs would take down children and small adults. There were a LOT of wild dogs because of all the strife. Once they got to be part of a pack, it doesn't matter how nice that dog was once the pack got hungry. They'd attack whatever they could catch. I don't trust dogs in any number greater than 2.

I don't know if this is what Erdogan is doing, but it's a thought in the back of my head.
It is a perverse incentive. will encourage people to take up dog farming. then when the program ends release them all to the wild. happened with snakes before
 
It is a perverse incentive. will encourage people to take up dog farming. then when the program ends release them all to the wild. happened with snakes before
Sure...though I'm not sure I'd want to be the guy caught doing that in the environment I was in. Gov was not afraid of literally putting boot to ass in order to make a point.
 
Roaming packs of strays is not acceptable and culling them is fine in my book, they're not cute little pets at that point, they're rather dangerous.

But they're islamic so they're probably going a bit further than that. My retarded islamic relatives were taught to kick dogs for no good reason and that included our little equally retarded pet dogs who wouldn't hurt anybody unless they were the height of an ankle.
 
Honestly its probably part of both.
The unspoken part is that when "based Serbia" does it for example, certain people don't care so much.
Or especially when Armenia does it:

Certain other people care when Russia does it.

And locals tend to care about consequences of not doing anything:

Just an average third world moment.
Are you fucking serious? It's a pack of wild fucking dogs, you don't need the fucking government to solve this shit.

You go into the woods and hunt those mutts down, like what the fuck, are you men or are you sheep?
 
Are you fucking serious? It's a pack of wild fucking dogs, you don't need the fucking government to solve this shit.

You go into the woods and hunt those mutts down, like what the fuck, are you men or are you sheep?
You can't just go around shooting dogs without actually disposing of them properly. Nobody wants to take a stroll through the woods and see endless rotting corpses.
Also, dogs are sort of dangerous. Unless you know what you're doing you could very well get killed.
 
Are you fucking serious? It's a pack of wild fucking dogs, you don't need the fucking government to solve this shit.

You go into the woods and hunt those mutts down, like what the fuck, are you men or are you sheep?
You do realize that IRL you don't get a minimap pointing you towards such packs?
And that a single person, even with a gun, is liable to get eaten if hunting a pack of vicious man eating predators due to numbers and the fact they are fast, low to the ground, pack hunters?

And then there is gun control which, almost every country out of the USA has.
Are you going to fight these maneating dogs in melee using kitchen knives?

Now, you COULD organize with other humans to do the hunting.
But that risks going to jail for forming a militia.
 
You do realize that IRL you don't get a minimap pointing you towards such packs?
And that a single person, even with a gun, is liable to get eaten if hunting a pack of vicious man eating predators due to numbers and the fact they are fast, low to the ground, pack hunters?

And then there is gun control which, almost every country out of the USA has.
Are you going to fight these maneating dogs in melee using kitchen knives?

Now, you COULD organize with other humans to do the hunting.
But that risks going to jail for forming a militia.
There's a population of 6300 and they have a military base in the village, they could've easily solved this before a little girl was torn shreds.

If the Serbians can do it, so can the Russian villagers. And according to the article this isn't the first time this happened, as apparently a teacher was mauled as he was escorting children.

Waiting for government officials to solve the problem for you when packs of wild dogs are going after your children is the epitome of sheep behaviour.
 
There's a population of 6300 and they have a military base in the village, they could've easily solved this before a little girl was torn shreds.

If the Serbians can do it, so can the Russian villagers. And according to the article this isn't the first time this happened, as apparently a teacher was mauled as he was escorting children.

Waiting for government officials to solve the problem for you when packs of wild dogs are going after your children is the epitome of sheep behaviour.
The military base is not an aid, it is an impedement.
This means they are right under the govt boot.
If they had NO govt they could have formed.

They are "waiting for the govt to solve it".
they are being strangled under the heel of govt oppression.

Russia literally cracks down on "far right extremists" (read: patriots).
Guess what forming a militia to kill child eating predators count as? such patriots are in the gulag.
 
Modern Italians should take some tips from the 1930's Italians when it comes to pesky non-Italians.
@ThatZenoGuy no, thank you. I just want the government to get problematic people, native or otherwise, minor or adult, to not be in the street and avenues.
The (I think) infantrymen, in this situation, reacted accordingly. Hostily was met with proper authoritative response, the guy on the other hand didn't "read the room" so he gets booted to Albania and then to where he fucking came from.
If he was Italian he would have deserved the same treatment, but instead of Albania he would be sent to jail.
 
Won't most of the west statistically have something insane like 85+% foreigner children on the population pyramid at that point?
America? More like New Mexico.
Germany? Little Somalia.
Sweden? Swedenstan.
Britain? Okay they only lasted 2 generations but "Second Pakistan" is thriving (in crime).
You have a point here,but...
It's nowhere near as bad in the US.

And also, cultural breaking points are already coming. What happens at and on the other side of them, remains to be seen. It's far from out of the question that ten or twenty years from now there will be literal crusades driving all Muslims out of Europe.

Or alternately, that many European governments fall to outright Sharia governments.

So much remains to be seen.
You also have a point.
It is matter of culture war now - future generation could be either good christians,only darker and less blond,or property of muslims.Maybe owned by China?

We do not lost yet.And - in Poland we never cared about race,before WW2 our nationalists,who fought jews becouse of economy,still belived that poles could be black or indians as long as they have polish culture.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top