Yeah because you're a little bitch, I've hunted everything that's walked or flied across Europe or America.Well, to each his own. I personally never eat anything that isn't sold in a store.
I'm going for Asia and Africa next.
Yeah because you're a little bitch, I've hunted everything that's walked or flied across Europe or America.Well, to each his own. I personally never eat anything that isn't sold in a store.
He didn't say "I would not ever eat them"And that's the reason why any sensible group would abandon you in a survival situation, cuz you'd be to busy whining in the corner about everything being too gross to actually contribute.
I care about busybodies trying to tell me what I should or should not eat, if they were trying to ban me from eating insects I'd be protesting just as much. Whereas you probably wouldn't give a fuck because you only stand on personal convenience rather than personal principle.
It's that kind of weak and soft headed thinking that leads to us not being able to buy raw milk/cheese in our grocery stores.
TL;DR
Complaining about bugs being 'gross' makes you sound like a little girl, you're taking the right position for the wrong reasons.
Ackshually, our ancestors drank beer only. because they knew you die if you drink water.Our ancestors also drank water from the same rivers that we dumped sewage in. Without boiling it.
Well, to each his own. I personally never eat anything that isn't sold in a store.
You obviously don't know what you are talking about if you spout enlightenment propaganda. No medieval people knew to not drink from water sources where they dumped their refuse. It wasn't fucking India. They did not know to boil water to kill germs though that is right.Our ancestors also drank water from the same rivers that we dumped sewage in. Without boiling it.
He didn't say "I would not ever eat them"
He said "I would not willingly eat them"
When you are forced by other people or circumstances, you eat the bugs to survive. But you are doing so under duress.
I personally agree with him. When not under duress, I refuse to eat bugs.
Yeah...You obviously don't know what you are talking about if you spout enlightenment propaganda. No medieval people knew to not drink from water sources where they dumped their refuse. It wasn't fucking India. They did not know to boil water to kill germs though that is right.
Never. As a matter of fact, I'm not sure if I've even seen one.Have you never in your life picked fruit off a tree and eaten it?
Yeah: They drank basically watered down beer because the alcohol in it killed most of the pathogens in water, while it also kept them hydrated because it was still mostly water.Ackshually, our ancestors drank beer only. because they knew you die if you drink water.
This is not actually true.Yeah: They drank basically watered down beer because the alcohol in it killed most of the pathogens in water, while it also kept them hydrated because it was still mostly water.
Also, a fun fact: Ancient Egyptian "beer" was actually more of a mildly alcoholic gruel full of nutrients than the liquid beer seen in modern times.
Never. As a matter of fact, I'm not sure if I've even seen one.
You don't think alcohol kills pathogens?This is not actually true.
It's one of the reasons why beer was so popular, its alcohol buzz aside. It was safe to drink.This is not actually true.
Don't play such games with me. You clearly meant it in a negative way.But the thing is what I said about you I don't think is an insult. It's not like I said "You are stupid." But you could be offended by what I said. So I thought it would be best to tag you so that if you disagreed you could say I'm full of shit, or mischaracterizing you.
Dude you went full @Marduk you never go full Marduk interpreting what I said in the dumbest way possible.
And don't play a term switch on me either. Traditional and conservative are different terms and they are not interchangeable.If it's been like that for generations then it would be traditional to adhere to it.
As above.Again adopting Islam is not conservative in Europe, because it is leaving what was traditional and bringing in a new religion and way. In fact adopting Christianity in Europe is traditional since that was the way the people have been raised until recently.
On top of that "traditional" also comes down to a question of "whose tradition". For example leftists in San Francisco celebrate pride month since decades, so it's traditional for them. But does that make it a tradition for their neighbors who don't?The same in the middle east adopting Christianity would not be traditional(even though the middle east used to be Christian before Islam took over) because in the middle east Islam is the traditional position right now and has been for hundreds of years. That doesn't mean being conservative there is good, in fact adopting new things and changing to Christianity would be good. Do you deny that the Muslim nations should instead change to be Christian?
Do you deny that you interpret what I say through the worst/dumbest lens?Don't play such games with me. You clearly meant it in a negative way.
I’ve seen people use it synonymously.And don't play a term switch on me either. Traditional and conservative are different terms and they are not interchangeable.
Yes San Francisco is traditionally a gay friendly town.On top of that "traditional" also comes down to a question of "whose tradition". For example leftists in San Francisco celebrate pride month since decades, so it's traditional for them. But does that make it a tradition for their neighbors who don't?
Huh, that makes sense.No agricultural worker could to afford to drink all beer, and small beer had way too little alcohol to actually kill microorganisms if further diluted. The idea of using alcohol to purify water was an early modern phenomenon for people with access to New World rum.
Hard physical labor requires way more hydration than modern office workers. Spring water was of course preferred, and Roman aqueducts try to bring that to the cities, but post Roman Europeans totally drank untreated river water. Which is why cities were disastrous population sinks well into the 19th Century.
Oh i could interpret it far worse than that.Do you deny that you interpret what I say through the worst/dumbest lens?
So? People make all sorts of mistakes in this sort of thing. If you follow idiots mindlessly, what does that make you?I’ve seen people use it synonymously.
Learn your fucking language:How do you define them.
So it's the tradition of the quarter million Muslims living there too?Yes San Francisco is traditionally a gay friendly town.
that... sounds reasonable.No agricultural worker could to afford to drink all beer, and small beer had way too little alcohol to actually kill microorganisms if further diluted. The idea of using alcohol to purify water was an early modern phenomenon for people with access to New World rum.
Hard physical labor requires way more hydration than modern office workers. Spring water was of course preferred, and Roman aqueducts try to bring that to the cities, but post Roman Europeans totally drank untreated river water. Which is why cities were disastrous population sinks well into the 19th Century.
I disagree with their conclusion based on their own research.1. People didn't drink beer because water was unhealthy[/H2]
It's often assumed that lack of access to clean water led people to drink beer instead. We know this isn't true for many reasons, not least because brewers needed a constant source of fresh water to make the best beer.
Water was certainly viewed as less healthy, but not because of any understanding of microbial contamination. According to a system of medicine and treatment used at the time, Galenic humorism, water was a "cold" drink that affected digestion, causing fluctuations and windiness. Meanwhile, beer was "warm and comforting", balancing the "humours" and quenching thirst.