Five minutes of hate news

I can see separatism becoming a problem for Brazil... 30 years from now, but nowadays, no.
Eh, separatism in Brazil would be like the Conch Republic. Theory is great, but I want to see the foo' that has the idea of doing it and how the hell they are going to defend borders of a newly minted states from the central government. Not even the crooks of PT and allies would want to get separated from the gravy train.
Also, but I do seem to recall that most of our compatriots are located in the coastlands with the exception of Sao Paulo and few others. Now, if the cities try to go SEPARATE, some of them you can just cut off trade, go on siege mode, and wait. I want to see how people who allowed crooks that can't remember how much they stole deal with faulty logistics, scarcity of food and trade.
Now, what do I see becoming a problem? Faith...to a degree. Because for some reason the last 20 years we saw the rise of Protestantism from like 5/7 per cent to 30/35% (?) in Brazil.
As for Greater Venezuela... pfft, their Armed Forces are in much worse straits than the Brazilian ones(although the Brazilian Armed Forces might reach there eventually).
Venezuela has already a shitty record with us and Lula is throwing them down the bus...or the Amazon. We might have an easier US Brazilians creating a South Venezuela than them annexing even a fraction of Brazil. Had not being wildlands in the Venezuelan Amazonas State Bolsonaro might have considered doing that.
What about Venezuella supported by Moscov and China?
Brazil has good relations with both of them, and both would like for things to stay the same(at least for now). Like I said, this isn't something to worry about now(pay attention to; yes, worry about, no).
Even during Bolsonaro Brazil got chummy to China but because of the "beef" "cartels" and agribusiness.
My mom's worried about Iran/Russia/whoever is allied with Maduro's Venezuela but that's almost a non-issue, because as @gral mentioned...we are on their good side even with a nationalconservative president and vice versa. So there's no point in worrying about an invasion from the North... I would be more worried who succeeded Maduro.

Now I would take the word over because I can't get as many updates as of now. I have been distant from the homeland a decade by now.
 


Well they are targeting their former "audience" at least in this case. You know, I would understand a gay person saying this "kind of thing" because Latinos and Arabs tend to have...a tighter view on LGBT issues, but no...he says fuck us (Latinos in my case) because they* allegedly voted for Trump.
I don't think he realizes that many Latinos likely voted for Trump because they came from countries where people like Harris are abundant (see the current head of the bank of BRICS or anyone in Latin America during the "pink-o wave") and in power in some cases.

*I formulated the sentence like I was a US citizen, but the nearest I have been to that is considering to work in Texas.
 
Last edited:


Deep Blue states have been in a financial crisis for years, and need constant federal aid to bail them out. This despite sky high taxes and having a majority of the nation's wealth.

So remember this any time some Dem starts lecturing you about how Dems aren't profligate spenders.
 


From the comment section :

To give understanding of the context of the current protests in New Zealand. NZ's most important constitutional document is the Treaty of Waitangi that was agreed back in 1840 as a partnership between Maori and the British Crown. It guaranteed Maori certain protections (particularly regarding rights to land and resources) while allowing formation of a British government, now the NZ government. In reality, since 1840 the NZ government violated the protections outlined in the Treaty of Waitangi. In more recent history in NZ, there has been establishment of principles in law plus an institution to go through a long process to attempt to redress these issues and their social outcomes. The current Bill essentially undermines these processes. Maori have not been consulted prior to the introduction of a Bill that directly contradicts long and well established conventions in NZ, plus the intention of the Treaty itself as a partnership. The Bill has been introduced by a minor political party (with 8% of the seats in parliament), due to the current MMP election process which often results in the major political parties negotiating coalition agreements with minor parties to gain a majority in the house.

As others pointed out on social media, the Maori aren't saints in any history book, be written by them or others. As well, EVEN according to Wikipedia this party has claimed "racial makeup superiority", this despite years prior they complained about 1 guy making threats of racial nature.

This party is a very valid argument against elections with proportional representation.

The only positive is that I can say is you have a very good looking MP.
 
Good looking?!

But I do agree that the Maori are massive crybullies. They even have that Palestinian habit of cynically crying genocide for political gain. The only difference is that the Kiwis are much less formidable than the Israelis.
 

An ambulance ran over a guy on bicycle.
Then rushed him to the hospital.
Then billed him 1,862$ for an ambulance ride
He also got some ~47k$ in hospital bills too.
And permanent decrease in mobility.
 
Good looking?!

But I do agree that the Maori are massive crybullies. They even have that Palestinian habit of cynically crying genocide for political gain. The only difference is that the Kiwis are much less formidable than the Israelis.
There's no universe in which that Maori chick isn't at least an 7 and a half. You can dislike her and her behavior, that's fair, but if you think that's not good looking I really don't know what to tell you.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top