First two shaft ship?

Buba

A total creep
No can find 😭

Somehow I cannot dredge up info what was the first ship with two shafts ... anybody know? Pretty please?
 

ShadowArxxy

Well-known member
Comrade
True, but Stevens abandoned the propeller after that and all his subsequent designs were paddle-wheel. Screw propellers didn't really make a comeback until the SS Archimedes in 1839.
 

Buba

A total creep
Actually, the very first steam ship with propellers was 2 shafted, built by John Stevens in 1804
You win on a technicality :)
BTW - good to know!
Rephrasing the question - when was the second two shafted ship built?
Or better - when was such a configuration adopted as mainstream for warships?
 
Last edited:

gral

Well-known member
Earliest twin-shaft warship I can remember is around the 1860's... HMS Pallas, maybe? Wikipedia page on her doesn't help, and my Parkes copy isn't exactly on hand... but it's around that time, mid- to late-1860's. Twin-shaft configuration was chosen because the RN wanted a shallow-draft ship for Baltic service.
 

gral

Well-known member
So it was HMS Penelope, then.

Mind that before people started feathering propellers(Propeller (aeronautics) - Wikipedia) around(IIRC) the early-to-mid-1870s, propellers caused so much drag when not being used that it was common to disconnect and lift them inside the ship - many ironclads had special gear for that(I think HMS Warrior has it, for those who can visit her).

I seem to recall Parkes commenting the twin propellers of HMS Penelope couldn't be disconnected and lifted inboard, which must have had a big effect on Penelope's speed when on sails.
 

Buba

A total creep
Wiki says about HMS Penelope:
She was the only twin-screw ship ever to have hoisting screws.[8] Provision for the hoisting frames and twin rudders forced a very unusual shape to the stern, which unintentionally greatly increased drag.[9]

So, we have narrowed down the coming of twin shafts and screws to the mid 1860s.
:)
Could it had been done earlier?
 

gral

Well-known member
Could it had been done earlier?
Technically, yes, but why? Steam machinery back then is bulky and expensive; your backup is your sailing rig. Not much need of having twin shafts unless other considerations come into play.
 

Buba

A total creep
Technically, yes, but why? Steam machinery back then is bulky and expensive; your backup is your sailing rig. Not much need of having twin shafts unless other considerations come into play.
No speed benefit of two props? Not possible to go faster under steam?
Of course, I imagine that the coal supply simply goes POOF! when steaming at flank speed ...
 

gral

Well-known member
No speed benefit of two props? Not possible to go faster under steam?

Not a big difference back then.

Of course, I imagine that the coal supply simply goes POOF! when steaming at flank speed ...

Oh, yes. IIRC, efficiency of steam machinery was around 3% at the time(modern Diesel engines have efficiencies around 35-40%). And that's at cruise - at flank it would be a lot worse.
 

Darth Robbhi

Protector of AA Cruisers, Nemesis of Toasters
Super Moderator
Staff Member
Several American Civil War ironclads had twin screws, so they were reasonably common a solution to multiple engines by October 1861.
 

LordSunhawk

Das BOOT (literally)
Owner
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
Yeah, USS Ozark in 1863 had *four* shafts

USS Dictator in 1863 was 2 shaft

The 1854 Stevens Battery design had twin shafts, but while she was laid down she was never completed.

Ohhh.... I found one! USRC Naugatuck was built in 1844, in service in 1862 as a coastal ironclad. Twin screws!

One thing I'd look for is ships with two steam engines, that usually means either paddle wheels or twin shafts for the screws.
 

ShadowArxxy

Well-known member
Comrade
Yeah, gearboxes capable of redistributing engine power were really not a thing in the early days. One propeller per engine was the way it was done.

The dual paddle wheels of a side-paddle steamer were typically connected by a solid shaft that did not allow for independent use of the paddles, although some designs had clutches to allow for semi-independent paddling for greater maneuverability.

(Amusingly, it was found that clutched paddlewheels could not be safely used on passenger steamers because when a ship came into port, the passengers would rush to the dock side of the ship. This meant that the ship was habitually imbalanced as it maneuvered to dock, and differential paddling was just too dangerous to use when so imbalanced.)
 
Last edited:

Buba

A total creep
Were the twin engined USN designs brought about by lack of suitably powerful engines?
Or being intended for brown water operations?
BTW - USN Dictator - gives me WH40K vibes ...
 

gral

Well-known member
Were the twin engined USN designs brought about by lack of suitably powerful engines?
Or being intended for brown water operations?
Most(if not all) of them were intended for river and shallow water operations.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top