Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow

[KilroywasNOTHere]

some days it's REALLY easy to buy into an anti-human sentiment.

 

[Sobek]

There is no war in Ba Sing Se

 

[Vyor]

MUST SEE VIDEO: Election Hack Identified that Can Instantaneously Swap Votes on a Ballot Before It Is Even Stored

That is a massively impractical attack, just getting it onto the machine would be hard enough but good lord the speed of discovery. Even just 1 in 1000 ballots being recorded wrong would be instantly detected in any manual paper ballot tabulation; and we know several of those were done and found nothing of the sort.

 

[Bear Ribs]

 

[DarthOne]

Josh Barnett-AZ (@BarnettforAZ)

He wrote the algorithm to steal elections and they tell us it isn’t real. Smh. This is under sworn testimony

nitter.net

Computer programmer swears under oath to judge that he wrote algorithms to steal elections for congressman.

 

[Arch Dornan]

Josh Barnett-AZ (@BarnettforAZ)

He wrote the algorithm to steal elections and they tell us it isn’t real. Smh. This is under sworn testimony

nitter.net

Computer programmer swears under oath to judge that he wrote algorithms to steal elections for congressman.

What drove him to confess when he wrote the algorithms?

 

[JagerIV]

That is a massively impractical attack, just getting it onto the machine would be hard enough but good lord the speed of discovery. Even just 1 in 1000 ballots being recorded wrong would be instantly detected in any manual paper ballot tabulation; and we know several of those were done and found nothing of the sort.

I mean, only if it did not change it pre-paper print out too. In normal situations, how closely do people review the paper ballot? If your even reviewing them?

Still, a lot of this is side issues compared to what was obvious on the night of the vote: they stopped the vote, stuffed a bunch of fake ballots in, and once the fakes are mixed in with the real there's no actual way to tell them appart, due to the anominous voting. Recounts just, well, recounts the fake and real votes together.

This is why I figured this fight was effectively over post the votes being counted: once the bad votes are mixed in with the good ones, there's no real way to fix it after the fact, save throwing out the entire election, which always seemed like a low probability event.

 

[Cherico]

What drove him to confess when he wrote the algorithms?

either plea deal or realized just how badly they were fucking up.

 

[Vyor]

Josh Barnett-AZ (@BarnettforAZ)

He wrote the algorithm to steal elections and they tell us it isn’t real. Smh. This is under sworn testimony

nitter.net

Computer programmer swears under oath to judge that he wrote algorithms to steal elections for congressman.

Ya, and the paper published on that virus was already posted. I even spoke on it at length.

It's a nothingburger.

I mean, only if it did not change it pre-paper print out too. In normal situations, how closely do people review the paper ballot? If your even reviewing them?

More or less every hand recount goes over the paper ballot.

 

[Captain X]

https://secondnexus.com/griffin-couy-removed-office-insurrection?fbclid=IwAR3_yIOJrm8KGvobwAPzQVUf6BeU8jVKrQfX4LbZu7VH9bt0vWU_cVHUa3M

Federal Judge Removes Trump Supporter From N.M. Elected Office For Jan. 6 Involvement

A federal judge ordered Tuesday a New Mexico politician be removed from office because of his involvement in the January 6 coup attempt at the United States Capitol.

Otero County Commissioner Couy Griffin—who is also the founder of a group called Cowboys for Trump—will be removed from his post after watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed suit against Griffin in March after his involvement in the insurrection was revealed.

 

[Vyor]

https://secondnexus.com/griffin-couy-removed-office-insurrection?fbclid=IwAR3_yIOJrm8KGvobwAPzQVUf6BeU8jVKrQfX4LbZu7VH9bt0vWU_cVHUa3M

Federal Judge Removes Trump Supporter From N.M. Elected Office For Jan. 6 Involvement

A federal judge ordered Tuesday a New Mexico politician be removed from office because of his involvement in the January 6 coup attempt at the United States Capitol.

Otero County Commissioner Couy Griffin—who is also the founder of a group called Cowboys for Trump—will be removed from his post after watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed suit against Griffin in March after his involvement in the insurrection was revealed.

Griffin was not accused of participation in any violent acts on January 6, but federal Judge Francis J. Mathew of the New Mexico District Court ruled Griffin having trespassed on restricted grounds and having “normalized and incited violence” constituted acts of insurrection.

Easy appeal, insurrection is very specifically defined in law and that doesn't fall under it.

 

[Rocinante]

I love how democrats simultaneously claim you'll need more than ar-15s to take on the government, while calling an unarmed protest on Jan. 6 an insurrection.

 

[Cherico]

I love how democrats simultaneously claim you'll need more than ar-15s to take on the government, while calling an unarmed protest on Jan. 6 an insurrection.

This is all coming back to bite them hard.

They fucked up bad real bad over the last two years and everything now reeks of desperation.

 

[DarthOne]

This is all coming back to bite them hard.

They fucked up bad real bad over the last two years and everything now reeks of desperation.

We will see.

 

[DarthOne]

Clinton-Appointed Federal Judge Bars Arizona Officials From Enforcing New Law To Remove Dead Voters, Nonresidents, And Non-Citizens From Voter Rolls

EXCLUSIVE: Clinton-Appointed Federal Judge Bars Arizona Officials From Enforcing New Law To Remove Dead Voters, Nonresidents, And Non-Citizens From Voter Rolls | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

AZ Secretary of State Katie Hobbs A Clinton-appointed federal Judge blocked a new Arizona election integrity law from being enforced in the upcoming 2022 General Election.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

A Clinton-appointed federal Judge blocked a new Arizona election integrity law from being enforced in the upcoming 2022 General Election.

HB2247 is meant to clean the voter rolls and remove registrants who are registered in another state and no longer live in Arizona. The new law would add a statement on voter registration forms, specifying that if a registrant permanently moves to another state after registering in this state, their registration will be canceled.

It would also direct the county recorder to cancel a voter registration when they confirm that the registered person is dead, that the person is not an Arizona resident or resident of that County, or that they are not a citizen of the United States.

The Gateway Pundit previously discovered during our investigation into the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) that the largest U.S. Counties removed only ZERO to TWO ineligible voters from their voter rolls in the last four years.

RIC, initially funded by the Soros Open Society Foundation, is essentially a left-wing voter registration drive disguised as a voter roll clean-up system and is used in Arizona and 30 other states.

State Rep. Jake Hoffman, the bill’s main sponsor, told The Gateway Pundit, “Democrats have stooped to a new level of shamefulness and depravity with their latest round of lies about Arizona’s common sense laws to ensure that our elections are accessible, secure, and trustworthy.”

Epoch Times reported,

Arizona officials cannot enforce a new election bill in the upcoming midterm elections, according to a federal judge.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs and other officials shall not “take any action to implement or enforce H.B. 2243 in a manner that would remove any voter’s eligibility to vote in the 2022 general election or disqualify any otherwise-valid ballot on the basis of H.B. 2243,” U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton, a Clinton appointee, said in the Sept. 8 order.
The officials and the coalition, which sued over the bill in August, agreed that “the provisions of H.B. 2243 should not operate in a manner that would prevent any voter from (1) voting in the upcoming November 2022 general election or (2) having their vote be counted.” Hobbs and Brnovich also decided that the changes to the state election code shouldn’t take effect until Jan. 1, 2023, because one of the laws the bill is amending is not effective itself until then.

Last month’s filing from Arizona Asian American Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander for Equity claims that this bill targets “only certain groups… naturalized voters and voters of color,” which is completely untrue. This law will affect all invalid or illegal voter registrations regardless of the person’s race or naturalization status.

“Democrats’ cries of racism are laughable on their face and serve only to shine a spotlight on the Democrat Party’s long history of institutionalized racism and repeated attempts to disenfranchise millions of Americans throughout the last century and a half,” added Hoffman.

He continued, “make no mistake about it, ensuring clean voter rolls and protecting the sanctity of Arizonans’ votes by prohibiting non-citizens and non-residents from casting illegal ballots benefits every single legal voter regardless of race, gender, income, and party.”

A similar attempt by Democrats to radically change election law by expanding drop boxes, mail-in voting, automatic voter registration, giving voter registration to all regardless of their citizenship status, and banning post-election audits was recently shot down by the Arizona Supreme Court.

The Gateway Pundit also reported extensively on the Arizona 2020 election audit, which discovered massive election law violations and hundreds of thousands of illegal or fraudulent ballots in the 2020 Presidential Election.

This is another attempt by the Democrats to steal elections through dirty voter rolls and mass mail-in ballots.

(sounds of incoherent rage)

 

[Cherico]

Bring it to the supreme court

 

[LordSunhawk]

OK, this one is a bit complicated. HB2247 was not supposed to take effect until *next year*, because it was passed right at the end of the legislative session giving no time for any of Recorder's Offices to actually be in compliance by the time this election cycle began. It's not as simple as it sounds, because by law in AZ they would need to make a good faith effort to contact each voter being purged from the rolls.

It is extremely likely that HB2247 will be upheld in its entirety once the lawsuits are completed, but all sides agreed a priori that it should not be implemented immediately. With the utter farce that is ERIC, unwinding from that is going to take at least six months, and as much as I consider him a spineless hack, Richer has taken the first steps in that process.

I will note that there were significant front-end improvements in terms of ballot security and following of proper process in the August primary, Sharpiegate 2entel Boogaloo notwithstanding. We had sufficient seals, we had the proper tracking forms back, there were signed receipts at the receiving site, and for the early voting centers they enforced a strict two-person/differing parties rule on ballot couriers with proper tracking.

 

[Vyor]

Honestly I agree with some of the judge's reasoning. It's a valid legal take, if the law is affecting something that itself doesn't come into affect until next year it should go without saying that it itself shouldn't take affect until then as well.

 

[JagerIV]

Ya, and the paper published on that virus was already posted. I even spoke on it at length.

It's a nothingburger.



More or less every hand recount goes over the paper ballot.

So? If it changes the vote pre-paper ballot print out, the paper ballot is also wrong. Thus what I said earlier about how many people really check the paper ballot all that closely, if they see it at all?

This is all coming back to bite them hard.

They fucked up bad real bad over the last two years and everything now reeks of desperation.

Eh, this post has very "if you kill your enemies, they win" vibes. Keeping your enemies out of power is winning, not losing.

 

[Vyor]

So? If it changes the vote pre-paper ballot print out, the paper ballot is also wrong. Thus what I said earlier about how many people really check the paper ballot all that closely, if they see it at all?

That would... quite literally require magic. Cause it don't work like that.