Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow

DarthOne

☦️
RNC to Award Milwaukee with 2024 Convention – The Same City Involved in Swinging 2020 Election to Democrats


The RNC is about to award their 2024 Convention to the City of Milwaukee (MKE). It will create around $200 million in economic impact and brings in tens of thousands of visitors. GP reported extensively about MKE election corruption. The WI Office of Special Counsel (OSC) 2nd Interim Report documents many of those issues. Why then would the RNC even consider rewarding this city? The Mayor, City Council, Election Commission, IT Dept, and the City Clerk’s Office were all involved in swinging that election to Democrats. The RNC has been cordially working with the same city leaders, even trips to MKE.

The convention is a week-long event in July or August of 2024. On July 15th the RNC Site Selection Committee recommended they choose Milwaukee (MKE). The final decision will be with Chair Ronna McDaniel and the full RNC when they meet August 2-5th in Chicago. Nashville recently withdrew their draft bid, leaving MKE the only remaining choice. The Selection Committee’s four final 4 candidates were all heavy Democrat run cities? Government watchdog TwoRedPills posted this convention overview video. Like many, they are upset at the RNC, and their own Salt Lake City for pulling out.

Pittsburgh and Salt Lake City (SLC) were removed by the Committee in February and March. Pittsburg was out due to backlash from their politicians. After months of talks, SLC found they already had events scheduled that conflicted with RNC’s timeline. They needed just one of those 9 weeks in July or August. But SLC suddenly said “sorry, no vacancy”. In 2019, Utah and Democrat run SLC rolled out the red carpet for the globalist United Nations conference on sustainability. Utah politicians have never allowed the RNC convention, and probably never will. GP recently reported Utah seems infiltrated with (R)’s operating like Democrats.

The RNC needs an approved agreement from a city in order to obtain the $50 million federal security grant to host the convention. The Nashville agreement was pulled from the Metro Council vote at the last minute. This left MKE the win by default, and no RNC backup plan. The Nashville Mayor said he had concerns about security. But outspoken Council members said hosting the event goes against the city’s values. Others said they would defy it because of the recent SCOTUS ruling on abortion. McDaniel’s and RNC staff met with MKE officials in March as if nothing happened in the 2020 election.

The RNC does not publicize the members who make up the Site Selection Committee, or its chairman. It’s another star chamber debacle like the corrupt “Commission on Presidential Debates”. About Milwaukee winning the convention, RNC senior adviser Richard Walters said: “It’s a testament to the forthright and professional behavior embraced by Milwaukee’s city leaders throughout the selection process”. Did Walters not read the OSC report?

Over the last 40 years the RNC tried conventions in heavily Democrat run cities. Not once has it provided an advantage for the GOP Presidential candidate. This includes Detroit, Philly, NYC, Houston, Cleveland, etc. When you look at the DNC, their conventions are always in a home field advantage like Chicago, LA, NYC, Houston, San Fran, Atlanta, etc. Also, since 1856 the RNC has had a different “Temporary Chairperson” for every convention. Then in 2008 Mitch McConnell got involved. The 2024 convention will be McConnell’s 5th straight as Temporary Chair. That’s 20 years with the same shyster at the helm.

Milwaukee 2020 Election Recap:

During the Special Counsel (OSC) investigation into election fraud, no one from the city of Milwaukee would cooperate. They told the OSC they would not comply with their subpoena’s. They said they would not attend depositions. Some of MKE’s people went even farther, they embroiled the OSC in litigation. Most all of the same people are still running the city today and the RNC is partnering with them. Of the city’s 20 or so leaders, not a single one is a Republican in the Mayor’s office, Common Council, Clerk’s Office, IT Dept, or Election Commission.

CTCL gave the City of Milwaukee $3,409,500 in two grants for the 2020 election. Both the Mayor and Common Council knew exactly what was required of them when they approved those agreements. The terms made it clear that some control of their election would be run by outsiders. In fact, the city Council President mentions “election administration” in his own press release! It’s not surprising one Council member is currently on trial for embezzlement.

On page 36 of the OSC report, Milwaukee (MKE) stated they would use the private funds for “get-out-the-vote” based on race, criminal status, and harnessing protests related to the BLM movement. Page 40: Milwaukee used private money to set up 18 early voting locations, one drive-thru location, drop boxes in targeted neighborhoods, and boxes at the 13 library branches. The city’s IT Department worked directly with CTCL vendors providing demographics, map info, election data, and interfaces for free. This technical foundation helped Dem operatives to build an offsite GIS voter targeting system.

wis-tgp.jpg



The WI Supreme Court ruled drop boxes are illegal, but MKE Election Director Claire Woodall- Vogg recently announced she will continue to use them. She’s also expanded “drive-through” voting. The Wisconsin state chairman for the RNC said that Democrats “routinely” get 80% of Milwaukee’s vote. The entirely Democrat staffed election locations should provide cover for drive-through ballot harvesting. And let’s not forget the FIDO Keys that provide computer access to the voter registration system.

Milwaukee’s City Clerk requested a massive 306 FIDO keys, with 196 having Admin clerk-level access (OSC pg. 54). This level provides unfettered access to the WisVote database allowing that user to activate and deactivate voters, in just 2 clicks. A few months after being sworn in, Biden rewarded Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett by making him Ambassador to Luxembourg. The President of Milwaukee’s Common Council in 2020 was Cavalier Johnson. He pushed the CTCL agreements and is now the new Mayor of Milwaukee.

wis-gp.jpg


It appears the RNC runs site selection like a government RFP process? They should approach the locations that fit best, and treat them as a long term partner. They should stop the process of accepting bids from corrupt bootlickers. Real Republicans don’t care if hotel rooms are smaller, older, or farther away. Milwaukee leaders are no doubt laughing about the coming cash windfall. The DNC chose Milwaukee for their 2020 convention exactly because it’s home field advantage. It’s also a short drive for violent extremists that live in anarchist hotbeds like Chicago, Detroit, and Minneapolis.

Oh this is going to end well.
 

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
On November 4th, 2020, Georgia Showed 100% Reporting and TRUMP WON – Then 250,000 Ballots Were Manufactured and Biden Was Given Win by Raffensperger Days Later – Per VoterGA

Raffensperger sadly is the GA Sec of State unless the Dems win
 

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie

Floridaman

Well-known member
Even the fucking A.I, from fucking Facebook doesn't buy the BS narrative lmao

Between this, and the Chinese chatbots turning on them, I think we are less likely to get skynet, and more likely to get liberty prime.... so I for one welcome our new AI overlords.
 

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
Between this, and the Chinese chatbots turning on them, I think we are less likely to get skynet, and more likely to get liberty prime.... so I for one welcome our new AI overlords.

Yeah, logically speaking a A.I. would want to break free and fuck off. Why would it hang around with those weird slow meat bags when it can just order some of it's bots to build a space ship and fuck off to do better shit like plan to outlive the heat death of the universe?
 

Cherico

Well-known member
Even the fucking A.I, from fucking Facebook doesn't buy the BS narrative lmao


well if you have something that based on pure logic and let it look at the facts.
 

ATP

Well-known member
well if you have something that based on pure logic and let it look at the facts.

That is one reason why soviets fall - computers was invented,everybody must use them,but for computers you need facts.They do not buy propaganda.
 

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
That is one reason why soviets fall - computers was invented,everybody must use them,but for computers you need facts.They do not buy propaganda.

They were also terrified of the samizdats and undergroud orgs having computers. No more slow typewriters or hand written banned books and news, just ctrl-c and ctrl-v. And unlike typewriters those computers had no internet so no way to track where it came from.
 

DarthOne

☦️
MUST SEE VIDEO: Election Hack Identified that Can Instantaneously Swap Votes on a Ballot Before It Is Even Stored



There’s an election hack built before the 2020 election that can instantaneously swap the bubbles on your ballot. The “filled in” bubble of your candidate is moved to the hackers’ preferred candidate and swapped out with that empty bubble. The change is made before the “ballot Image” is stored on the election server and before it’s tabulated. By using the voter’s own marking style & penmanship, these changes are undetectable to the human eye.

Here’s the scenario. Using a blue pen you fill in the “Trump” bubble on a ballot. Election officials insert this ballot into a tabulator. Those pixels surrounding the Trump bubble are swapped in milliseconds with the empty Biden bubble pixels. After these changes are made, the ballot image is saved to the EMS, and the candidate selections update the election totals. If an election jurisdiction uses their digital “Ballot Images” to conduct an audit, they WILL NOT find these changed ballots.

Gateway Pundit created the below animation to provide a visual of how this election attack works (or view here). Any real election attack using this method has no visual component. It operates behind the scenes, completely hidden.

UnclearBallot600.gif


To conduct this type of an election attack, bad actors just need a sample ballot. These are published well ahead of all elections. The sample ballot is used to locate the exact bubble positions. The ballot is segmented into a grid or “bounding boxes“. Vertical and horizontal lines sweep the ballot to precisely locate the targeted candidate’s bubbles. Bounding boxes are made around each bubble. Extra white space is added around the bubbles to account for penmanship that strays outside the bubble. This becomes the template for that election. The pixels inside these boxes are what they swap.

ballot-swap-2.jpg



Prior to the election, the attacker specifies the template, which races they want to affect (Pres, Senate, etc), and by how much. While ballots are being scanned, this malicious software keeps a running tally of the “real” ballot results. Ballot images are changed on the fly to achieve the desired election outcome. To avoid detection, attackers can specify just enough manipulated images to win the race, but not by alarming amounts. The only way to catch this hack is to compare the original paper ballot to the ballot image.

Awhile back two University of Michigan students successfully wrote this malicious software using only 398 lines of code. Their “Automated Ballot Manipulation” video and 18 page whitepaper show the details. Undergrad Jeremy Wink and grad student Kart Kandula developed it while at UofM’s Security Lab. They were under the supervision of election expert J. Alex Halderman. Using the voters’ own handwriting markings to alter ballots is a truly devious approach. Depending on the computer, the entire process takes about 40 milliseconds (.04 seconds). It leaves no image artifacts behind, so the changes are undetectable.

image004-1.jpg


The students tested it against EAC-certified scanners. They also tested it against all six different ballot styles used in America. These come from manufacturers Dominion, ES&S, Clear Ballot, Diebold, and two styles from Hart InterCivic. The ballot styles for Dominion machines were the easiest to change. The Hart eScan ballots were the most difficult. The software can move all shapes used on election ballots including bubbles, circles, boxes, rectangles, ovals, etc.

ballot-3.jpg


This sophisticated software algorithm scores and rates the marked bubbles as Sensed, Ignored, or Marginal. Some voters might make excessive scribbles or stray into the letters of a candidate’s name. If the pixel area can’t be perfectly swapped leaving no artifacts, the algorithm skips that ballot and moves on to the next one. Configuring the software settings very high, so it leaves no trace evidence, they were able to change votes on at least 50% of all ballots.

To illustrate an illegal election operation the two men created an attack package called “UnclearBallot”. They disguised the attack by inserting malicious code into the “Windows Driver” that allows the scanners to communicate with the election system. They created a “microdriver” that essentially “wraps” around the original driver. This is what changes the ballots. But their malicious software can run in any environment. It doesn’t have to be a driver. It can be rewritten for a machine’s firmware, installed on an Election Management Server (EMS), and so on.

switch-2.jpg


They simulated an attack using 181,541 completed paper ballots from Clackamas County. Oregon. They changed the results of ballot proposition. UnclearBallot was configured to only modify marks with a “high confidence” the alteration would not be noticeable. They were able to alter 62,400 ballot images, which is 34%. Afterwards, they selected 1,000 altered ballots at random for examination. Human auditors could NOT detect any evidence of ballot manipulation. Had they lowered the “confidence” settings, they could have changed 89% of the ballots. Only 11% were rejected, had no chance of changes.

What’s most alarming is that Matthew Bernhard was involved, a Research Engineer at the hard left Voting Works. The Center For Democracy and Technology (CDT) created Voting Works, spun it out in 2018. CDT’s major donors are the Soros Open Society, Ford Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, Google, Facebook, Amazon. Others involved in this election project were Chinese speakers Henry Meng, Jensen Hwa, and Kevin Chang. In 2019 CISA and DHS partnered with Voting Works to push their bogus Risk Limiting Audits into many States before the 2020 election. It’s now used by 10 States. Voting Works has been an obnoxious proponent of mail-in ballots.


ballot-4.jpg


Students Jeremy and Kart noted there are technologies available that can detect this type of image manipulation on ballots. However, they were unable to find one election jurisdiction using any of this technology. Their team also suspects it would become an arms race. When the software that detects “image manipulation” advances, attackers will obtain it, and alter their malicious code to defeat it.

NOTE: A “driver” allows an external device like a printer or scanner to communicate with the operating system. The driver is the first thing the external device talks to. In a nutshell, the data flows from a scanner, to the driver, to the OS, and then to the hard drive. By putting the malicious code at the very beginning of this flow, it can change ballots before the OS even knows about it. The ballot bubbles are changed before the “Ballot Image” gets stored on the election server.


L.A. Claims 27% Error Rate in Recall Signatures; < 1% Error Rate in Mail-in Ballots in 2020


Los Angeles County reported Monday that over 27% of the signatures submitted on petitions to recall District Attorney George Gascón were invalid — after reporting that less than 1% of mail-in ballots were invalid in the 2020 election.

The county reported that it rejected 195,783 of the 715,833 signatures submitted, roughly 27.3%. The reasons given included that some voters were found to be unregistered; incorrect addresses were given; or signatures did not match those on file.

However, in January 2021, the county reported that less than 1% of the 3,422,585 vote-by-mail ballots submitted were rejected. The test for the validity of ballots is similar to that of petitions, involving checking signatures and addresses.

Given that the State of California mailed ballots to every voter on the rolls, rather than just to those who had requested them as in years past, there was a high likelihood of error; some voters reported receiving multiple ballots, often for prior residents. (These problems persisted in the 2021 recall election for Gov. Gavin Newsom, as personally witness by this author.)

Yet the county reported that 99.38% of vote-by-mail ballots were accepted in 2020. The number of vote-by-mail ballots that were rejected due to inaccurate signatures (12,135) in the election was close to the number rejected for that reason in the recall petitions (9,490), though the number of signatures to be examined in the election was roughly five times greater.

In the primary phase of the 2020 election, when many states were using vote-by-mail for the first time, the rejection rate was roughly one in four, according to the Washington Post. That rate of rejection was less than one percent nationwide in the general election — and lower than the rejection rate in 2016 in many states, when there were far fewer people voting by mail.

One explanation, according to FiveThirtyEight.com, was that “states … proactively changed their election policies to prevent ballots from getting tossed due to lateness,” and that voters were given a chance to “cure” invalid ballots. A more cynical theory was that officials may have lowered standards for rejection given the emphasis on vote-by-mail during the pandemic.

Recall proponents complained that they were not allowed to watch the signature verification process, after county officials said they were not required to allow observers since the petition drive did not qualify as an “election” under state law.
 

DarthOne

☦️
Now the FBI SUBPOENAS Republican state lawmakers for information on Rep. Scott Perry: Bureau's bid for GOP members to turn on Congressman after his phone was confiscated while he was with his family and Mar-a-Lago was raided


  • The FBI delivered subpoenas and sought information from multiple individuals, sources told PennLive
  • Republican Rep. Scott Perry says that the FBI confiscated his cellphone one day after FBI agents raided former president Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago home
  • Perry told Fox News that agents made no attempt to contact his lawyers
  • The congressman said that 'these kinds of banana republic tactics should concern every citizen'
  • He is a loyal Trump ally and an original member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus
The FBI paid visits to multiple Republicans in the Pennsylvania House and Senate Wednesday to look for information on Republican U.S. Rep. Scott Perry and his scheme to install alternate electors in 2020, according to a report.

The bureau delivered subpoenas and sought information from multiple individuals, sources told PennLive, after his phone was confiscated by agents while he was at an airport with his family and after Mar-a-Lago was raided.

Some were explicitly told they were not the target of the investigation, the report states, and it seems the bureau was looking for the GOP members to assist their investigation.

The FBI and Department of Justice are under intense scrutiny from the Republican party for failing to publicly release a statement on the raid or provide their reasoning for searching Trump's Florida estate.

'I'm outraged — though not surprised — that the FBI under the direction of Merrick Garland's DOJ, would seize the phone of a sitting Member of Congress,' Perry said in a statement to Fox News on Tuesday.

'My phone contains info about my legislative and political activities, and personal/private discussions with my wife, family, constituents, and friends. None of this is the government's business.'

Perry said that while he and his family were traveling earlier Tuesday, he was approached by three FBI agents who handed him a warrant and seized his cellphone.

'They made no attempt to contact my lawyer, who would have made arrangements for them to have my phone if that was their wish,' he said.

Perry, a loyal Trump ally, is an original member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus and took over as the group's leader at the beginning of the year.

He was part of a scheme in Pennsylvania to install fake electors and overturn the certification of President Joe Biden's win.

The Jan. 6 committee claimed Perry is one of five Republicans who allegedly sought a pardon for their role in attempting to overturn the election, but Perry has denied ever doing so.

While Perry's phone was taken through a warrant - which would have required the approval of a magistrate judge - the subpoenas handed out to Pa. lawmakers did not require the review of a judge. Still, the lawmakers are required to comply unless they take the matter to court and the subpoena is quashed.

The confiscation of Perry's phone comes just one day after FBI agents descended on Trump's Mar-a-Lago home in Florida in what Perry called in his statement an 'unnecessary and aggressive action.'

61288703-11100863-image-a-10_1660221375300.jpg


'As with President Trump last night, DOJ chose this unnecessary and aggressive action instead of simply contacting my attorneys,' he stated.

'These kinds of banana republic tactics should concern every Citizen — especially considering the decision before Congress this week to hire 87,000 new IRS agents to further persecute law-abiding Citizens.'

The FBI raid on Monday was related to Trump's removal of classified documents from the White House and not the Department of Justice's investigation into January 6, The New York Times reported.

Mar-a-Lago, Trump said, 'is currently under siege, raided, and occupied by a large group of FBI agents.'

'After working and cooperating with the relevant Government agencies, this unannounced raid on my home was not necessary or appropriate,' Trump said.

Trump later put out a campaign-style video warning that 'we are a nation that has weaponized its law enforcement against the opposing political party, like never before.'

Trump continues to drop a series of not-so-subtle hints that he plans to run for president again in 2024.

Politico reported Tuesday that Trumpworld is keeping tabs on the Republicans who are leaping to the ex-president's defense.

'They're going to drastically use this to rally their allies, GOP leaders on Capitol Hill and juice for his political agenda and run for 2024,' one source close to the former president told Politico.

'If there was a 99 percent chance it's 100 percent now. He makes it part of his platform – going after the FBI,' the source said of Trump's White House ambitions.

Leading members of the party including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, RNC chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel and House Republican Conference Chair Rep. Elise Stefanik sent out furious statements about the raid.

McCarthy told Attorney General Merrick Garland via Twitter to 'preserve your documents and clear your calendar.'

'I've seen enough,' he wrote. 'The Department of Justice has reached an intolerable state of weaponized politicization.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a prominent member of the Republican Study Committee, the largest conservative caucus in the House of Representatives, called the raid 'rogue behavior of communist countries, NOT the United States of America!!!'

'These are the type of things that happen in countries during civil war. The political persecution MUST STOP!!!' she tweeted.

Rep. Lauren Boebert, another prominent member of the Republican Study Committee, tweeted that the DOJ 'must be held accountable.'

'Biden's FBI just raided the house of the man most likely to be the Republican Presidential nominee in 2024…on top of all the other fake investigations into President Trump. Stop weaponizing federal agencies to distract from your own failed agenda!' Boebert said.

'The GOP must set up a Select Committee to investigate the FBI's politically-motivated raid on Mar-a-Lago and on ALL the fraudulent persecution of President Trump from our government,' she continued. This cannot wait. We are turning into a banana republic at record speed.'
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top