United States Department Of Government Efficiency (DOGE) News & Discussion

You'd think all the oversight and accountability agencies would've caught this shit, but nope:

Article: Two contractors spent 9 years and $200M working on a modern provider enrollment system at @CMSGov. After 14 missed deadlines, zero usable output was produced. The contract has now been cancelled.

Smart decision by @CMSGov and we look forward to working with you. Source: https://x.com/doge/status/1897773612418863579
This is very normal for software development contracts. I recently picked up a project where contractors delivered 5-10% of what was promised. Our internal development team can do in months what contractors promise for years and never deliver, yet we keep getting overridden by other parties in the department.
 
Let me be very clear: no, I don't work for the government, I work for a private corporation that has a CONTRACT to perform work for the government*. However, all the computer systems I work with are PROVIDED by the government because the work I do involves government computer networks, thus for things like software licensing they go through government procurement.

------------
* The specific job I do can only really be done via a contract, as it involves auditing the security and conformity to standards of State department computer systems. Contractors hired to make such systems have obvious conflicts of interests in performing such an audit**, and likewise the customer FOR those systems*** have conflicts of interest in performing said audit as well, thus the need for a third party.

** Those fuckers will do ANYTHING to avoid having to conform to even basic fucking IT security standards if they can because they don't want to take the time and effort to do the most basic of IT standup work. Never trust development teams on security, they only care if their system does what they were hired to have it do, anything beyond that including the most basic of security, is extra work they hate doing. Lazy asses.

*** They are only concerned with two things: is the system doing what it's supposed to do and is it online. Anything beyond that they are willing to give a pass too... at least until there's a massive data breech that exposes American PII, then they love to start pointing fingers and claim everyone but themselves were not doing their job and that nobody told them there were these issues. Which is where, once again, we come in. We give them a report that they have put SIGN that says they recognize the risks we identified and accept them, so no wiggle room if a data breech occurs, the government bureaucrat is on record as accepting the risk that was exploited.
This is why I love that the DoD keeps things in house.

@Rocinante and I did not know that's how they work and I use them a lot at my work
 
This is why I love that the DoD keeps things in house.

@Rocinante and I did not know that's how they work and I use them a lot at my work
I like to utilize them for our field techs. They have very basic cheap laptops that only have an OS (or we will use thin clients at offices) and then the users can travel place to place and always have the same computer (vm) to use, but if the laptop is ever stolen or lost, no company data is on it, and they can jump on a number of company systems and still access the same machine with their data and settings.

VMs are great.
 
I like to utilize them for our field techs. They have very basic cheap laptops that only have an OS (or we will use thin clients at offices) and then the users can travel place to place and always have the same computer (vm) to use, but if the laptop is ever stolen or lost, no company data is on it, and they can jump on a number of company systems and still access the same machine with their data and settings.

VMs are great.
VMs are very good. The problem I have is that sometimes the laptops management wants people to use to access the VMs are utter crap. We have one high up guy in my department here at the Department of Children and Families here in FL that wants us to give everyone Chromebooks that I wouldn't give to a middleschooler for writing on.
 
I like to utilize them for our field techs. They have very basic cheap laptops that only have an OS (or we will use thin clients at offices) and then the users can travel place to place and always have the same computer (vm) to use, but if the laptop is ever stolen or lost, no company data is on it, and they can jump on a number of company systems and still access the same machine with their data and settings.

VMs are great.
Army forces everyone to use them at home if they don't have a Army laptop.
And we already have to use our CACs, this adds another layer of security as you have to install it on your computer, the remote desktop app, with a CAC card (the servers that us, with a specific code)
 
This is why I love that the DoD keeps things in house.

@Rocinante and I did not know that's how they work and I use them a lot at my work
No they don't. DoD uses all kinds of civilian contractors who have to be issued liscenses and workstations.

I should know, I was a civilian contractor supporting the USMC as a NOC Technician. Had both a Marine and Navy issued computer I worked on with attached emails.
 
No they don't. DoD uses all kinds of civilian contractors who have to be issued liscenses and workstations.

I should know, I was a civilian contractor supporting the USMC as a NOC Technician. Had both a Marine and Navy issued computer I worked on with attached emails.
At the NOCs yes.
Hell, we had GISAP when I was in Korea.
But when I mean we run it internally, most major units have what's called a TACSIPR, a self contained net that can connect to a normal one if you have a token.
Self contained by Army soldiers.
I know because we were trying to overhear the servers to get out of an exercise
 
screenshot-2234-png.7062241

Trans twitter activist and Cyberlaw person doxed all of DOGE.
 
screenshot-2234-png.7062241

Trans twitter activist and Cyberlaw person doxed all of DOGE.

So in other words he's not going to bitch when the same thing is done to him and other trans activists right?

I swear these idiots never think about any potential long term conquences of their behavior. They think they can just punch and attack and attack and that no one will ever respond in kind.
 
Last edited:
Do these idiots not realize they are pissing off people who run circles around them on the internet?

I can't imagine what the DOGE people are cooking up in their dreams about how they're gonna clap back.

Um it gets worse much worse for them.

The trans community makes up less then a single percent of the population, instead of being concentrated into defensible ghettos their spread out like pixy dust relatively speaking, they have no ability to naturally reproduce, and the community has managed to become loud obvious and obnoxious.

This is a perfect scapegoat, when the current strange era of niceness ends their fucked the moment things get hard and the powers that be need some one to blame and to throw to the mob to save themselves.

They are fucked.
 
If it gets that bad it won't even get that far. Likely, in a scenario like that, the world has actually gone to shit and the medications keeping them alive and not dying from their bodily mutilation will not be available. The remainder will detransition because they are trenders and not actually dysmorphic. The real dysmorphic will return to masking.

Very, very few will be targeted like this.

The alphabet people are too entrenched for anything but full on social collapse to remove them from our enemies' internal governance.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top