Critical Race Theory In Schools

DarthOne

☦️
The Teacher Unions are America's greatest enemy by a factor of 10. Everything that has become worse in the past 50 years can be traced back to Marxist-Progressives in the classroom.

Court battle looms over high-volume South Kingstown school records requests


SOUTH KINGSTOWN, R.I. (WPRI) – A South Kingstown resident who has drawn national media attention for filing a large number of public records requests regarding racial issues will meet the state’s biggest teachers union in court Monday after the union filed a lawsuit.

Nicole Solas’ public records pursuit started with questions to an elementary school principal about what her child might be taught in kindergarten, and her persistence has subsequently catapulted her to national prominence, including multiple Fox News appearances.

In April, Solas emailed the principal requesting to see the school curriculum, as well as other materials such as “past and present lesson plans that incorporate or promote the ideologies of antiracism, gender theory, transgenderism and Critical Race Theory.”

The principal asked Solas to submit a formal request under the state’s Access to Public Records Act (APRA). Between April and July, Solas and her husband filed 200 and 100 requests, respectively.

On Aug. 2, the National Education Association Rhode Island teachers filed suit in Superior Court, seeking an injunction to prevent some materials from being released to Solas.

“I was doing what my school district told me to do when I had questions about whether critical race theory and gender theory were being taught in the school district,” Solas told Target 12. “The NEA should be ashamed that they’re targeting parents who want to know what their children are being taught.”

The South Kingstown school district released a portion of the materials sought by Solas on July 13, totaling roughly 6,500 pages of documents. The district requested $74,000 to give Solas everything she has requested. Solas told Target 12 she has paid $1,600 so far.

Bob Walsh, the union’s executive director, said he agrees that Solas should have access to the school’s curriculum because it’s a public document. But told Target 12 that NEARI thinks some of Solas’ other requests involve material that should not be made public under APRA.

Walsh said the lawsuit has two goals: “Stop the school committee from releasing anything that’s 100% protected under law, usually involving collective bargaining,” and ask the court to “impose a balancing test on whether individual names should be released — whether the privacy interests of individual teachers outweighs any underlying elements of the requests, and if so, what do they do.”

Walsh also said that even though the lawsuit names Solas as well as her husband, the central focus of the litigation is about stopping the school committee from releasing certain information.

“The only reason she’s named in the complaint is law requires all interested parties to be named in the complaint — this is not a dispute with her at all,” Walsh said. “This case has nothing to do with Nicole Solas.”

If Solas asks to be removed from the lawsuit in court Monday, Walsh said, NEARI would agree.

When Target 12 asked Solas if she would request to be removed from the lawsuit, she said she would not reveal her legal strategy. And she said she “absolutely” felt targeted by the suit regardless of Walsh’s comments.

“You don’t name someone as a defendant in litigation, and then remove them the next day as a way to say, ‘We didn’t mean to bully you,'” she said.

Asked why she was named, Walsh said Rhode Island state law mandates that any interested parties be named in a lawsuit. If not for that requirement, he said, NEARI would not have named Solas or her husband at all.

When Target 12 asked Solas about this law, she replied, “I guess we’ll have to see how that plays out in court.” Solas said the Goldwater Institute, a conservative public policy think tank, is representing her pro bono.

Her lawyers filed a response to the NEARI’s lawsuit on Wednesday, arguing the request for an injunction is invalid and should be thrown out.

TLDR:
Mom overwhelms the school system by filing 200 FOIA requests to find out if school system is teaching CRT, school system not happy.
 

Whitestrake Pelinal

Like a dream without a dreamer
CRT is the new Racial Quotas.
They already have racial quotas through state and federal hiring standards, similar standards for contractors, and federal regulatory harassment of employers who fail to meet goals for 'representation'. It doesn't matter whether they are called quotas, when they function as quotas.

CRT is something much more perverse, it is the enshrinement of Cultural Marxist bigotry against European peoples, and the relentless harassment and shaming of innocent white children. Much of it with the complicity of their worthless parents.
 

49ersfootball

Well-known member
They already have racial quotas through state and federal hiring standards, similar standards for contractors, and federal regulatory harassment of employers who fail to meet goals for 'representation'. It doesn't matter whether they are called quotas, when they function as quotas.

CRT is something much more perverse, it is the enshrinement of Cultural Marxist bigotry against European peoples, and the relentless harassment and shaming of innocent white children. Much of it with the complicity of their worthless parents.
Yet CA despite their liberal bluster, banned racial quotas in education, businesses, etc., with Proposition 209 in 1996.
 

Bear Ribs

Well-known member


Apparently Loudon county put a ton of barriers in the way trying to stop Matt Walsh from speaking and is doing their best to keep any parents from speaking anymore, but he had the money (he had to rent a house to get in at one point) and time to bull through all the obstacles, just to get his sixty second flame in.
 

DarthOne

☦️
6Wb1KfGD.jpeg


School-Board Group Asks Biden to Review Whether Parent Confrontations over CRT Constitute ‘Domestic Terrorism’


In a letter to the White House, a group that represents school boards urged the Biden administration to consider whether confrontations by outraged parents over COVID restrictions and critical race theory (CRT) being incorporated into class curriculum violate the Patriot Act. The letter contended that “the classification of these heinous actions could be the equivalent to a form of domestic terrorism and hate crimes.”

The National School Boards Association has asked President Biden to determine whether recent incidents of threats and violence against educators are prohibited under the legislation, passed in the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks, as well as the Gun-Free School Zones Act and a number of other statutes.

“Coupled with attacks against school board members and educators for approving policies for masks to protect the health and safety of students and school employees, many public school officials are also facing physical threats because of propaganda purporting the false inclusion of critical race theory within classroom instruction and curricula,” a letter from the group obtained by Fox News read.

For over a year, parent activists have been battling school board members over COVID school policies, such as universal K-12 masking, as well as the teaching of critical race theory in the classroom, with some skirmishes culminating in teacher resignations or parents pulling their children out of public school.

The school board group’s escalation of the conflict to the federal level signals that many parents’ qualms with their tax dollars potentially funding indoctrination or a racialized education are being dismissed as illegitimate by administrators.

In Loudoun County, Virginia, which became ground zero for school board fights last year, an anti-CRT organization launched $500,000 worth of ads slamming the local school board for attempting to shut down the parent resistance to the district’s equity and inclusion initiatives. Similarly, in Guilford, Connecticut and other typically Democrat-dominated suburban towns across America, grassroots parents are building movements to oust their progressive school boards that have been spearheading or rubber-stamping new politicized curriculum changes.

During a press conference Thursday, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki indicated that the administration is investigating whether it can get involved to protect the school boards allegedly receiving these verbal assaults.

“We’re continuing to explore if more can be done from across the administration,” she said. “Obviously these threats to school board members is horrible. They’re doing their jobs.”

Echoing Psaki at a U.S. Senate committee hearing Thursday, Education Secretary Miguel Cardona slammed the antagonism against school administrators, applauding the school boards for their commitment to safe school re-opening. He expressed concern with the level of animus and aggression exhibited at some school board meetings, calling it “very dangerous.”

School board group asks Biden to use the Patriot Act against parents over opposition to COVID measures, CRT


A group that represents school boards is asking the Biden administration to review threats and violence against education administrators and schools to determine if they violate the Patriot Act and hate crime laws amid clashes between angry parents and educators over COVID-19 policies and critical race theory being taught in classrooms.

In a Wednesday letter to Biden, the National School Boards Association asked that the federal government examine whether actions can be taken to stop the vitriol and violence using the Gun-Free School Zones Act and the Patriot Act, the controversial statute enacted after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

The request comes amid a culture war that has prompted some school officials to resign or not seek re-election.

"Coupled with attacks against school board members and educators for approving policies for masks to protect the health and safety of students and school employees, many public school officials are also facing physical threats because of propaganda purporting the false inclusion of critical race theory within classroom instruction and curricula," the letter signed by NSBA President Viola Garcia and Chip Slaven, the group's interim executive director and CEO, states.

In addition, the NSBA asked for a review of threats and violence under the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, the Violent Interference with Federally Protected Rights statute, and the Conspiracy Against Rights statute.

In recent months, school districts across the country have seen angry demonstrations and confrontations between parents and education officials at school board meetings. The letter cited anger over school mask directives and critical race theory, which focuses on how power structures and institutions impact racial minorities.

Many opponents have labeled it racist.

Loudoun County, Virginia has become the epicenter of anger against such policies. A group opposed to the teaching of CRT, Free to Learn Coalition, recently launched a $500,000 ad blitz criticizing the local school board. Loudon County administrators and teachers were reportedly blacklisting and doxing parents who spoke out against controversial critical race theory's use in public school classrooms.

On Thursday, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said responsibility for protecting school boards falls largely to local law enforcement but "we’re continuing to explore if more can be done from across the administration."

"Obviously these threats to school board members is horrible. They’re doing their jobs," she said during a press briefing.

At a U.S. Senate committee hearing on Thursday, Education Secretary Miguel Cardona decried the hostility against school board members and praised their "unwavering support" to reopen schools safely. He said the lack of civility in some meetings is disappointing and, in some places, it has been "very dangerous."

Terry McAuliffe, the former Democratic governor of Virginia who is running to lead the state again, drew ire this week when he gave his thoughts on how much parents should be involved in making school decisions.

"I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach," he said during a debate against Republican Glenn Youngkin in Alexandria.

The NSBA letter cited numerous news articles and incidents in which threats were made against school board officials and meetings being disrupted. In Michigan, one person yelled a Nazi salute in protest of mask requirements during a meeting and another person angry over CRT prompted the board to call a recess, the letter said.


School board meetings have been disrupted in several states, including California, Florida and Georgia.

In Arizona, three men allegedly threatened to make a citizens arrest of a principal over the school's COVID-19 measures.

"These threats or actual acts of violence against our school districts are impacting the delivery of educational services to students and families," Garcia and Slaven wrote.

In addition to the Patriot Act and Gun-Free School Zones Act, the NSBA also asked the U.S. Postal Service to intervene against threatening letters and cyberbullying against students, teachers, board members and other educators.
 
Last edited:

49ersfootball

Well-known member
6Wb1KfGD.jpeg


School-Board Group Asks Biden to Review Whether Parent Confrontations over CRT Constitute ‘Domestic Terrorism’




School board group asks Biden to use the Patriot Act against parents over opposition to COVID measures, CRT

OMG!
 

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
They are commies and view anyone standing on their way as fascists. Fuck them.

And, of course, we now know how it works with these people.


Tl;Dr Thin Blue Line not ok because political and "not related to school", but LGBT pride and BLM is "support for LGBT students and black students" so it is suddenly ok.

There is no consistency, no firm rules. It's just about pushing the propaganda. Stop trying to argue with these people, they literally cannot do so in good faith. Defund all of it.
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
They are commies and view anyone standing on their way as fascists. Fuck them.

And, of course, we now know how it works with these people.


Tl;Dr Thin Blue Line not ok because political and "not related to school", but LGBT pride and BLM is "support for LGBT students and black students" so it is suddenly ok.

There is no consistency, no firm rules. It's just about pushing the propaganda. Stop trying to argue with these people, they literally cannot do so in good faith. Defund all of it.

I would be 100% fine with them banning thin blue line flags, if they also banned all those other flags.

But you know they aren't going after THOSE flags.
 

Bear Ribs

Well-known member
Here's a fun one.


To fight systemic racism they're removed all "F" grades and all papers automatically count as 50% done no matter what was actually put in. Also, "grades will not include behaviors, attitude, tardiness to class, whether the assignment was turned in late or on time."

I'm sure this will ensure those students are much better prepared for the workforce (I know my bosses never care about behaviors, attitude, coming in to work on time, or finishing my tasks as scheduled) with the reasonable expectation that you'll get paid at least 50% even if you put in zero effort whatsoever.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
Here's a fun one.


To fight systemic racism they're removed all "F" grades and all papers automatically count as 50% done no matter what was actually put in. Also, "grades will not include behaviors, attitude, tardiness to class, whether the assignment was turned in late or on time."

I'm sure this will ensure those students are much better prepared for the workforce (I know my bosses never care about behaviors, attitude, coming in to work on time, or finishing my tasks as scheduled) with the reasonable expectation that you'll get paid at least 50% even if you put in zero effort whatsoever.
The military cares heavily on all of those. Lets hope none of them join the military
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top