China ChiCom News Thread

liberty90

Evil Neoliberal Cat
It's not a good idea to be a Chinese billionaire currently, lol, but I don't believe that they will nationalize currently private parts of industry. Some specific sectors may suffer, but full return to central planning is still unlikely.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
It's not a good idea to be a Chinese billionaire currently, lol, but I don't believe that they will nationalize currently private parts of industry. Some specific sectors may suffer, but full return to central planning is still unlikely.
Why do you say that?
They seem to be pulling everything under the state flag?
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
You are surely not incapable of recognizing different factions in the Party and you surely understand that post-1976 CCP reformed into fascist corporatism, instead of using orthodox marxist central planning methods. Even under Xi it's still the case. Do not underestimate Chinese economics by believing it to be as moronic as in the USSR.

Now, it's not as efficient as free markets can be, but still. Performance of India under remnants of the Nehruvian socialism and License Raj is no better. Nor is the current Western world as capitalist as it was once the case.

I was comparing Chinese economics now to their own economics of the past, not to the USSR.

I'm quite aware that they're different, but the current leadership suffers from the same kind of ideological blindness that Mao, Stalin, etc, did. They will not necessarily make the same mistakes. Regarding completely incompetent farming, I don't think it's even likely that they will, but they're certainly capable, and are very likely to make many others besides.
 

Vaermina

Well-known member
It's not a good idea to be a Chinese billionaire currently, lol, but I don't believe that they will nationalize currently private parts of industry. Some specific sectors may suffer, but full return to central planning is still unlikely.
Only if you're one of the billionaire's too stupid to get out of China.
 

liberty90

Evil Neoliberal Cat
Ah yes, the good ol' fallback argument of any modern commie:
"It was not REAL communism!!1!"

As is usually the case, it depends on how words are defined. If "communism" is understood as "country ruled by party with communist in name", then both China 1965 and China 2021 are "communist", indeed.

If we understand "communist" as "a country with all significant means of production state-owned or collectively owned" then China 1955 was communist, while China 2021 is not communist, no.

Why do you say that?
They seem to be pulling everything under the state flag?

Meanwhile Hainan is still becoming one of the worlds biggest free trade zones. "everything" certainly sounds like a too strong word.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
As is usually the case, it depends on how words are defined. If "communism" is understood as "country ruled by party with communist in name", then both China 1965 and China 2021 are "communist", indeed.

If we understand "communist" as "a country with all significant means of production state-owned or collectively owned" then China 1955 was communist, while China 2021 is not communist, no.
You do realize that the CCP inserts a party official into every company, who's job it is to make sure that said company doesn't do anything they don't like, right? They may not directly own them, but they do control them to a far greater extent than any other "capitalist" nation.

Meanwhile Hainan is still becoming one of the worlds biggest free trade zones. "everything" certainly sounds like a too strong word.
"Free trade" zone, right; and if you believe that, I've got a bridge I can sell you.
 

liberty90

Evil Neoliberal Cat
You do realize that the CCP inserts a party official into every company, who's job it is to make sure that said company doesn't do anything they don't like, right?

In Russia people need political connections with the Kremlin to be truly rich, or they tend to end badly. In India, it's illegal to fire people from their work in bigger enterprises, without special permit. In the United States, it's often illegal to build a skyscraper without a few years of environmental reviews.

Now, some of these things are different than others, but generally speaking it's usual for modern sources of power to ensure that the companies "doesn't do anything they don't like".

Perhaps United Arab Emirates are the special case, as their authoritarian capitalism is truly more free-market based than most nations in the world, but they started their engine on controls over oil.

Reality is of course very complicated, and borders are of course unclear.
 

The One Char

Well-known member
You do realize that the CCP inserts a party official into every company, who's job it is to make sure that said company doesn't do anything they don't like, right? They may not directly own them, but they do control them to a far greater extent than any other "capitalist" nation.
In other words, they're Fascist.
 

TyrantTriumphant

Well-known member
It looks like China may be in trouble. The Chinese real estate developer Evergrande has said that they will soon be unable to pay their debts. Which is understandable as they owe 300 billion dollars.

Unless the Chinese government bails them out China may see a total real estate collapse. But if they do that then other groups are going to demand a bailout too.

The Chinese stock market has already taken a hit, and things don't seem likely to get better soon. I'm interested in how this turns out.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
The United Kingdom banned the Chinese Ambassador to said United Kingdom from speaking before Parliament over sanctions that China issued against UK parliament members because said UK Parliament members made comments speaking out against Chinese actions and behavior towards Uighers in the Xinjiang Province.

Al Jazeera said:
The ban, described by the London-based Times newspaper as an “unprecedented intervention”, prompted a furious response from China.

“The despicable and cowardly action of certain individuals of the UK Parliament to obstruct normal exchanges and cooperation between China and the UK for personal political gains is against the wishes and harmful to the interests of the peoples of both countries,” a statement from the embassy said.

China imposed sanctions on nine British politicians, lawyers and an academic in March for spreading what it said were “lies and disinformation” over the treatment of the mostly Muslim Uighurs.

Among those sanction by China include were former Conservative Party leader Iain Duncan Smith and Tom Tugendhat, the chairman of parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee for supporting a so-called "Genocide Amendment" which was supposed to limit British investment in China but apparently tabled.

 

gral

Well-known member

gral

Well-known member
Biggest problem(and the reason why bailing Evergrande will ultimately be futile) is land prices. Land being horribly expensive is one of the big reasons real estate companies are in so much debt, yet these prices won't go down, because selling land is the main source of revenue by far for local government in China.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top