United States Army Staff Sargent charged with racially biased attack

FriedCFour

PunishedCFour
Founder
You just moved the goal post here. Can the police and other law enforcement agencies just do no wrong in your mind?
Here’s them doing wrong.


They also did wrong at the capital when they shot Ashley Babbit. Feds have a laundry list of things they did wrong. This case they did no wrong though.
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
Here’s them doing wrong.


They also did wrong at the capital when they shot Ashley Babbit. Feds have a laundry list of things they did wrong. This case they did no wrong though.
Yeah but Zach will probably defend both
(We already know he's defending one of them)

I hate the phrase bootlicker because the left uses it if you say anything other than "ACAB," but it might be a fitting term for @Zachowon
 

Captain X

Well-known member
Osaul
I'm honestly pretty disappointed with him, because he otherwise has a good head on his shoulders, but anything to do with the military or law enforcement, or even spooks and he suddenly becomes a cheerleader or this:
tenor.gif
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
I'd suggest backing off a bit on Zach. Disagreeing with him is one thing, disparaging is another.

That said, my "for goodness sake, please articulate your point better" point from the other day still stands.
I mean as long as he's going to mindlessly defend anyone with a badge or a uniform I am going to continue to call him out when he does so.

In this very thread, Even after he's shown he's wrong (the police did not perform cpr,) he just shifts the goal posts and kept the same opinion. Sticks to "everything by the books," even though the story changed. In another thread he was simultaneously arguing that the IC doesn't release rumors, while arguing that what they released was just a rumor. He was also arguing that it was just one person, while also arguing that it was a decision that had been made by the organization. Again, contradictory statements, but he remains consistent that they can do no wrong.

He just floats around between different "facts," but keeps the same opinions regardless.

That's going to get you called out. If he doesn't want to be called out, he has the option to try to make better arguments, or maybe just once admit that an officer can be wrong.

But I will refrain from just talking down on him without adding to the discussion from here out.
 
Last edited:

Battlegrinder

Someday we will win, no matter what it takes.
Moderator
Staff Member
Founder
Obozny
I mean as long as he's going to mindlessly defend anyone with a badge or a uniform I am going to continue to call him out when he does so.

That's fine. Just don't do the "now, I'm not calling you a bootlicker, but you do strike me as the sort of man that knows what a pair of timberlands taste like" thing.
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
That's fine. Just don't do the "now, I'm not calling you a bootlicker, but you do strike me as the sort of man that knows what a pair of timberlands taste like" thing.
To be clear, I am outright calling him a bootlicker.

I am also emphasizing that it takes A LOT to get me there, because I hate that term, and rarely use it.

But this is just picking hairs. I get what you're saying
 
Last edited:

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
Yeah but Zach will probably defend both
(We already know he's defending one of them)

I hate the phrase bootlicker because the left uses it if you say anything other than "ACAB," but it might be a fitting term for @Zachowon
Fuck you.

I will kot defend what is going on with the SSG in SC.
the only fucking reason I defended the officer who shot someone on Jan 6th is because we don't know what the situation was in his mind and until he stands fucking trial for it we should wait till the fucking facts...

Well that's getting overturned on appeal.



There are some states where it's not even legal to do that due to the standards.
Not just get overturned but mistrial for the appeal.
Thank you Maxime Waters
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
Fuck you.

I will kot defend what is going on with the SSG in SC.
the only fucking reason I defended the officer who shot someone on Jan 6th is because we don't know what the situation was in his mind and until he stands fucking trial for it we should wait till the fucking facts...


Not just get overturned but mistrial for the appeal.
Thank you Maxime Waters
He's not going to stand trial for it and they won't even release his name
 

Sailor.X

Cold War Veteran
Founder
Here’s them doing wrong.


They also did wrong at the capital when they shot Ashley Babbit. Feds have a laundry list of things they did wrong. This case they did no wrong though.
Sherriff Lott doesn't just charge people for shits and giggles. Since he charged the Drill Sgt. you can be sure there is more info to the story that is not public knowledge as of yet.
 

FriedCFour

PunishedCFour
Founder
Sherriff Lott doesn't just charge people for shits and giggles. Since he charged the Drill Sgt. you can be sure there is more info to the story that is not public knowledge as of yet.
Sheriff Lott is a life long democrat who is a piece of shit charging a man who did nothing but throw out a man who was groping girls and infants in that neighborhood, a mentally ill sex offender. He then declined to charge the people who showed up at that drill sergeants house and threw bricks at his home. You’re right, it’s not for shits and giggles. It’s putting politics first and appeasing the race mob.


Hes bent the Knee to Burn Loot Murder, and he wants to appease them, so he sacrificed the Drill Sergeant and declined to charge the guy groping kids and declined to charge the BLM people who attacked him at his home.
 
Last edited:

LindyAF

Well-known member
Sherriff Lott doesn't just charge people for shits and giggles. Since he charged the Drill Sgt. you can be sure there is more info to the story that is not public knowledge as of yet.

Literally the second result for this guy is about how he may have covered for a deputy of his sexually assaulting a student, what gives you the impression he's a stand-up guy?
 

Sailor.X

Cold War Veteran
Founder
Literally the second result for this guy is about how he may have covered for a deputy of his sexually assaulting a student, what gives you the impression he's a stand-up guy?
Because I know the guy that is why. Me an him never had bad interaction and he was always fair with people when I was around. So sorry if I don't just throw people I know under bus.
 

FriedCFour

PunishedCFour
Founder
Because I know the guy that is why. Me an him never had bad interaction and he was always fair with people when I was around. So sorry if I don't just throw people I know under bus.
He certainly likes to throw people under the bus.
 

LindyAF

Well-known member
Because I know the guy that is why. Me an him never had bad interaction and he was always fair with people when I was around. So sorry if I don't just throw people I know under bus.

Huh, small world I guess.

I get thinking well of someone you know. The thing is, I'm pretty sure the average fairly nice guy, fair to most people he meets Sheriff would be charging Pentland right now, regardless of whether or not there was something more damning to the story that wasn't public knowledge yet. You don't have to be some obviously antiwhite cackling villain or In-On-It-Bohemian-Club-member-Rothschild to function as a cog in the neoliberal establishment system. Responding normally to the incentives the system gives you is enough. He doesn't have to be actively trying to find an excuse to throw Pentland under the bus in order to throw Pentland under the bus, he just has to be thinking "hey I don't know this guy, and I don't want to eat a media shitstorm over this, I'll just charge him and the courts will sort it out."
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top