Armchair General's DonbAss Derailed Discussion Thread (Topics Include History, Traps, and the Ongoing Slavic Civil War plus much much more)

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
The self own on your part here is incredible, given that's not true.
LMAO.

> No one cares

And yet, here you are replying; if you didn't care, you wouldn't be. I have you fuming as usual and it makes me utterly happy because you're so impotent.
It makes me happy that you are more impotent, forced to bring this back to metadiscussion yet again.
I have no reason to justify my replies to you, and if you don't like it, you can fuck off to a different forum.

Cool, prove it. Lets see your sources for this.
Sources for what?
My source is basic fucking common sense applied to the fact that Estonia has no weapons of strategic range.
Next time you ask such a stupid question i'm going to ask source for you not being a reptilian.
Is being retarded a point of pride for you or is it something just happens?

So what happened to no one caring, as you claimed? Are you really that special that you forget what you wrote in three sentences?
More "muh three throwaway sentences" style quips and metadiscussion. You're such a fucking clown. No one cares. And i don't care enough to explain it to you, lol.

And yet, I have you raging in my replies. That you waste your time, when you can be doing anything else, speaks volumes about whom the real fool is in your world view, huh?
Your idiocy is the only raging thing here.
I'm trying to raise the average IQ level on the forum i mod, lol.

Why would I want a bunch of low IQ people on my side anyway? I just enjoy dunking on you lot at this point, particularly you.
Source please for you not being low IQ yourself.


This would be a better insult if you knew how to spell the word "debunked".
Not only you're an idiot, but i guess i need to add internet memes to the long list of things you don't know, and in this case i've in fact referenced a right wing one, so you not knowing it is something you should be particularly ashamed of.
a7ada7595026bccccc9b8660826798f6c85865229489fe6cab0f7fa03ee88bd7_1.jpg



As usual, your capacity to self ownage is the only thing that makes my job here hard, because you are already the joke.
I'm in fact quite capable of self ownership, unlike you, who should be sold at a market for two cents at most.
I'm sure it would, but then one of the very few smart people in this thread wouldn't be here, now would they? Hell, when I get busy and don't reply here, you all still post about me; I've seen several of your number even publicly melt down about other people liking my posts, you're that fragile.
I guess you have self confidence... Can we make a poll? Your credibility is the only thing that would melt down, if you had any remaining that is.
Yes, your retardation is such a sensational thing on this forum that people are mentioning it occassionally as a kind of golden standard of sheer idiocy.

I would suggest learning how to avoid your country getting bulldozed by your neighbors, but hey.
Doesn't change the fact that you're such a dumbass that you couldn't turn on sound in a twitter video, LMAO.

The part where you made that the fuck up; it says around Soledar, like the Sol Mine which is to the West of it but not in the city itself. Only in your deluded world can the RuF be clearing a town to the West of Soledar without stopping to consider that means either the garrison has been encircled or the Russians have already taken the city. Likewise again, your capacity for self-ownage never ceases to amaze me:
It's a mine in Soledar, not a town west of Soledar, you discount Baghdad Bob clone. If you had the mental capacity to check this in Google Maps before you typed it, you would have saved yourself a lot of embarassment.
You can even click on the residential area west of Mine 7 and it will be designated as part of Soledar, just as the mine itself.
"Ukrainian forces are highly unlikely to hold positions within the settlement of Soledar itself."​
News at eleven: American idiot unilaterally declares outskirts of Soledar located west of Mine 7 as no longer part of Soledar despite the administrative status of them as well as and geographic continuity with built up areas of Soledar indicating otherwise.
 
Last edited:

ATP

Well-known member
That you're too much of a bitch to even @ me would probably be one of the first of Marshall Kutuzov's thoughts, the second being you're trying to cite him without even knowing how to spell his name would be a very funny second.

Sure,sure.
Jokes aside - your idols could win,IF:

1.They had hidden army waiting for RIGHT HOUR in 200 underground cities on Ural.Not impossible,they cood have apemans,clones or cyborgs there,and ,since they never cared about how many of their slaves die,they really could let their current army be destroyed to lure USA into some kind of trap.

2.USA would stop sending Ukraine obsolate weapons and old ammo.Not impossible,too - Democrats gave Central Europe to soviets for notching in 1945,why nor do that again?

3.Biden manage to finish off USA.Possible,too.

Your problem is,that you belibe in current soviet army defeating Ukraine which keep getting USA obsolate weapons.
NOT GOIN TO HAPPEN,DUDE.

P.S If you are kgb agent,do not meet them alone.I said the same to @Chiron,and dude probably died.
Pity,i liked his posts.

By the way,could you deliver some soviet propaganda about brave soviets fighting evil spirits,when cowardly ukrainian run?
I miss it,too.
 

Scooby Doo

Well-known member
Makes me wonder if in a alternate reality how well Ukraine would do if America was attempting to invade and the rest of the world was supplying Ukraine and sending volunteers how well would it do?
 

ATP

Well-known member
Makes me wonder if in a alternate reality how well Ukraine would do if America was attempting to invade and the rest of the world was supplying Ukraine and sending volunteers how well would it do?

Problematic,USA could not invade,unless through Black sea or Poland.
So,instead maybe USA invading Mexico,and China and Moscov sending weapons for them?
Becouse invading Canada would be too easy.
 

Scooby Doo

Well-known member
Problematic,USA could not invade,unless through Black sea or Poland.
So,instead maybe USA invading Mexico,and China and Moscov sending weapons for them?
Becouse invading Canada would be too easy.
Hmm let's say the US tried invading Ukraine through Black Sea (To replicate the logistical issues the Russians have).
bospurus.png



Could the Ukraine stop the US Navy from establishing a beach head and aerial superiority?
 

ATP

Well-known member
Hmm let's say the US tried invading Ukraine through Black Sea (To replicate the logistical issues the Russians have).
bospurus.png



Could the Ukraine stop the US Navy from establishing a beach head and aerial superiority?

No,you would send carriers with enough planes to prevent that.Few Neptune missiles would not save Ukraine.
And,USA,unless soviets,would manage to destroy ukrainian air forces.
But,if Ukraine would get weapons from not only Moscov and Belarus,but also Poland and Hungary,and USA do not bomb those countries,then they would win on battlefield,take Kiev,but eventually must run anyway.
Just like in Iraq.

They also saw what happened to every local political honcho in Donetsk and Luhansk(first, they lost power and became minions of the Russian State; then Russia started killing them off); essentially, their only way out is to defeat Russia.

Yes,local heroes there mostly died.Those who supported Moscov.Ukrainian oligarchs could survive only in free Ukraine,Moscov would kill them,even if they support invasion.
 

lloyd007

Well-known member
Makes me wonder if in a alternate reality how well Ukraine would do if America was attempting to invade and the rest of the world was supplying Ukraine and sending volunteers how well would it do?
Outside of some land swap between Russia and the USA, it would be utterly impossible for the USA to have access to Ukraine without the US widening the war immediately by wholesale violating everyone's airspace + Gallipoli 2022 or heck even crossing into the Mediterranean if Spain + Morocco + UK tell em to fk off with any warships.

But assuming a magical land swap, Ukraine is pretty doomed pretty quickly if Desert Storm / OIF are anything to go by. Their air defenses and air force get obliterated in the first hours, any CV task force in the Black Sea will be at full readiness and alert rather than the poor Moskva with all its ASM defenses either broken or otherwise turned off. Armored units would be properly supported by air and infantry and Ukraine would be facing HIMARS and etc. from the other side. It would be very improbable that the rest of the world could unpack and ship enough equipment to Ukraine in time to stem the tide.

'Ukraine' would probably eventually 'win' such a conflict the same way the Taliban and etc. did, by inflicting a few thousand killed buy many, MANY more wounded through asymmetric warfare which would quickly sour much of the determination the US public has since we're obviously unwelcome and no one really cares once the 'main grievances' are satisfied i.e. Mirror Universe Zelinsky is fished out of his spider hole / taken out by SEAL Team 6 or whatever.
 

TheRejectionist

TheRejectionist
>Sources stuff from WSWS of all places - aka World Socialist Web Site
Yet another remember that anti-establishment leftist are still leftists too.
>Hides behind being anti-war rather than pro-Russia and whines about military industrial complex
Typical hippy style leftism... Go be anti-war and anti military-industrial complex in Russia and China, have your martyrdom. If you could, do us a favor take the climate protesters with you too. At this point i'm going with an assumption that anyone who claims to be "anti war" either is a naive idiot, or thinks the person they are saying it to is an idiot to be fooled.
>At this point what is strange, questionable or doubful about Ukraine wanting to talk itself into being as close to NATO as possible, as quickly as possible, they are under bloody attack by Russia for almost a year, what do they have to lose? Russia will get angry at them?
>Proxy war between USA and Russia is a global conflict of an unprecedented scale.
Korea, Vietnam and Afghanistan called, and had words to say about US education system, history specifically...
>Drunken Medvedev grade nuclear scaremongering
Lmao, go back to smoking weed.
>Imperialist motives at play
Moscow's imperialist motives? I hope he meant Moscow's...

Oh Jesus Christ you are annoyingly insufferable.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
Oh Jesus Christ you are annoyingly insufferable.
He's right and you know it.

Just because you want to blame your economic woes on support for Ukraine, instead of the Wu Flu fucking things up, and still buy Russian/Soviet propaganda, does not change the reality on the ground or who is the aggressor here.
 

TheRejectionist

TheRejectionist
He's right and you know it.

Just because you want to blame your economic woes on support for Ukraine, instead of the Wu Flu fucking things up, and still buy Russian/Soviet propaganda, does not change the reality on the ground or who is the aggressor here.

His and your truth. There are few universal truths in this world but Russia being the aggressor certainly ain't one of them🖖
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
Oh Jesus Christ you are annoyingly insufferable.
Good, let this annoyance and suffering help you rethink the politics you promote.
His and your truth. There are few universal truths in this world but Russia being the aggressor certainly ain't one of them🖖
I don't know what mythological definition of "aggression" are you using here, but it's Russian forces attacking the internationally recognized territory of another sovereign state, *and annexing it*, just in case some very naive western people might get it confused with some kind of peacekeeping mission or something other "just like America did".
 

TheRejectionist

TheRejectionist
Tucker: Failing to back a proxy war in Ukraine was the one thing Trump was not allowed to #shorts see ya King of Babylon.
Good, let this annoyance and suffering help you rethink the politics you promote.

I don't know what mythological definition of "aggression" are you using here, but it's Russian forces attacking the internationally recognized territory of another sovereign state, *and annexing it*, just in case some people might get it confused with some kind of peacekeeping mission or something.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
I'm not failling for mindless "establishment said sky is blue so i'm gonna say it's green just to spite them" from other political factions either.
Also i can remember that the first impeachment of Trump was not about aid to Ukraine, but trying to get dirt on Biden from Ukraine, which would obviously be of much more self-interested importance to Democrats. Nice try, hippie-isolationist alliance of convenience, but not good enough.
Muscovite rule sucks, i was of that opinion before Clintons&cronies had their "reset" with them, i stuck by that when they had it, and i stick by it when it fell apart.
I cannot be swayed by any brainlet argument along the lines of "but X said Muscovite rule is bad, and you don't like X, so you have to start liking Muscovite rule".
 
Last edited:

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
You do know Trump gave the Javelins to Ukraime right and had kept troops there to train the Ukrainians....

And this isn't a proxy war. This is us sending aid.

Was World War 1 until we got invivled a proxy war? Was world war 2 before we got invovled a proxy war?
Because if those are considered proxy wars then you have a point.


Also, Russia invaded Ukraine. That makes them the aggressor
Hell, I will say it. The US and coalition invading Iraq made us the aggressors. But ay least we had a decent cause. And yes chemical WMDs were found.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top