Search results

Overwhelming Aegis would mean more missiles launched then countries have launchers

Because the radars China sent are newer then the rest on the list, and they most likely have them set up both in the east and west to watch for attacks from the west and India. The fact is that they have radars that are supposed to be super new and advanced. To help them and yet....

Let's see, the IBIS-150 , Standard AS radar SLC-2 pretty new system by the looks of it. JY-27A and again pretty standard radar. Kinda interesting these didn't pick it up. YLC-18A. Maybe it is the size of the drones but these as well should have picked dit up based on what I can find. Hmm

Did you know the US loses war games more times out of ten then it wins them? Because we have our adversaries in war games be really competent on the level of us and they generally always win so we can adapt. Like how many times have our allies shot down a 22 in a war game? Just for the 22 to be...

It is the 22 if it was newer but not as good. Because the 22 is the king

I mean, it has the lowest crash rate at the 12 year mark compared to its predecessors. And do remember, what can be considered an issue for the mikitary or the pilots and the like, can be minor as something not being comforting in the seat to various other issues. Should we bring up what the...

Let's put this into perspective. The US military has the capability for something an F 35 sees to guide in a strike from a ship that can't see it

Everything he is saying is basically "if the US gets the stupidest ideas and acts like it is at peace and not at war, and plays into every hand of the chinese" As well as not understanding how radars work. And the fact that most support aircraft are flying further back and higher then most...

@JagerIV you do know that you can use civilian satellites to track ships right? And cheap radars are not the same as expensive ones. They have diffrent capabilities

And this is just what ONI and the MI community are willing to release

There is no doubt. Everyone looking in from the outside only sees the negative. But on the inside, we are taking China VERY serious. We have increased trainings with allied nations in the Pacific for a reason. The arms industry thrives off war. But it also focuses on what rhe DoD and Congress...

We wouldn't handle them with kid gloves. We would handle them like the threat we see them as. Which is an actual peer threat and that means gloves come off. We would use the entire might of our AF and Navy to destroy what we deem as critical to thier fighting force. Also, thier political party...

I would love to see the contents you post

Hey, not my fault yall withdrew from colonial possessions still count as losses, like we did in 2 nations.

Sovereign is British, And at least both his country and mine have actually been successful in military matters compared to both the countries you come from. Italy hasn't had a good military since Rome, and Brazil...well....yeah. The US kicked ass in 03, defeated Hussains forces easily Desert...

So...they lost because they withdrew. Just like how the US gave both A-stan and South Vietnam back to the local governments and they lost.

So you count that as a withdraw but when the US does it, it's a lose?

Withdraw counts as defeat

And how would China be able to move 30 to 50k troops into Iram without anyone noticing....

We are weak, have outdated training and weapons, a Navy that is barley functioning, and that we would lose to any competent adversary that isn't in the sand box. But hey, at least we have had modern successes in our history. And have shown repeated times our equipment is superior to anything...