Search results

There's a hard-to-find short story by CS Lewis titled The Shoddy Lands which offers the reader a peek inside the head of the sort of person who doesn't really see or care about anything outside of herself.

Indeed. But modern-day American Cultural Marxists don't seem to do Social Responsibility, Personal Accountability or any of those old-fashioned notions. Everything for them is about self-expression, self-empowering, self, self, self.

Defying the gods sufficiently to bring their wrath down on the kingdom he ruled sounds like quite serious mismanagement.

Maybe they are so in their own bubble that they don't understand the reaction normal people will have to seeing the face behind the mask?

They die, I suppose. But I don't think our side will get a laugh from it. More like we'll just be happy that the people who hated us are gone.

They want you dead... and they think it's funny.

Gives one a window into how they think.

And we tell the Leftist that unlike Aliens, Mexicans are known to exist.

It basically just expresses their hatred for Trump. Which is pure emotion, with no "Wall of Text" except as an exercise in rationalization. If you sat one of them down and asked "Explain to me what was so bad about President Trump?" what's the betting that he or she could tell you a specific...

Sorry, you're right. I got the threads confused.

The Kimberly Parker Tamlin-Vesper 's of this world are not known for their self-awareness or moral integrity. Consider: their whole thing seems to all about any form of "superiority" being bad and wrong. Why does she have such a problem with whites being smarter than blacks otherwise? But at...

Here's one that shows their innate mindset Telling that the Kimberly Parker Tamlin-Vesper type people do not want to raise those educationally deprived inner-city blacks up, no, they just want to push other people down. If anything, this motivates me to use more big words. :cool:

I am not a Communist, nor aligned with their objectives. But I don't think we can say the same thing with certainty about some of the people in the CIA.

Or Communists. Consider how Cambodia was developing economically under its king, before the CIA got Pol Pot to take over. I'm starting to think there's a pattern through the 20th and 21st centuries - any leader who tries to build up his country for the benefit of his own people will get deposed...

I still think the other guy would have been worse.

The other problem is those politicians who will gleefully use such common-sense arguments as a foot in the door for removing the rights of everyone. Get rid of that problem, and I suspect that a lot of other things would be more easily resolved.

What about this one?