Search results

You can't just "demand they prove" something in court. You have to bring suit for laws broken, or injury caused. Or alternatively, have such rules imposed somewhere and let them bring suit against it. Your post sounds like angsty teen edge lord stupidity. I'm sure you're better than that. Were...

It's gonna be dull. He'll misspeak probably at least once per public speech. He'll forget the gist of what he's talking about several times on the campaign trail, particularly towards the end.

https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/cyber/russian-interference-in-2016-u-s-elections Yes there is. The degree it effected things, and whether it was done in conjunction with trump or just in support of him is debatable. That they tried to fuck around with it really is not. Russia tries to fuck with any...

Jeez, it's like a broken record... I didn't compare trump to hitler. I didn't compare his moronic adherents to nazis. I did compare the rallies of the two groups, for reasons I've stated repeatedly. I'm going to get pushback? OK, consider my shit pushed back. There isn't exactly a great deal of...

No, I wasn't doing that either. See below, so I'm not typing the whole thing out twice. Okay, in a tangential way, I'll agree that it's a comparison to hitler of sorts. Again, in passing, whilst discussing a totally different topic. What I am not doing is saying trump is hitler. I'm not saying...

Jeez... You didn't actually read things at all, did you? I didn't say trump is like hitler because he has rallies. I didn't actually say trump was like hitler, at all. I simply described trumps rallies as "reichsparteitag" in passing, in a discussion of a completely different argument. So, I was...

Well, now I can finally see that! Well, I do have over a dozen posts outside the politics section, but my first posts were definitely there. But then, is this not a politics forum? Certainly the politics section has as many posts or more than the entire rest of the forum put together...

Oh, neat! I had no idea about that. I don't usually use landscape. Thanks.

Whelp, I dunno if it's a samsung thing, some option I don't know how to change, or something else, but it's not there for me. 🤷‍♂️ Since I only use phone to post, I guess I never really realised. EDIT; Well, there is a check box to show signatures in preferences, but I already have it ticked...

That would be an extraordinarily odd thing to lie about, don't you think? As for the rest, the phone is Samsung S20+ so not bleeding edge but hardly "utter garbage" (Also, gosh you've got a lot of misplaced agression!) and I don't see how an understanding of how to use technology even enters...

Sorry, if there's a way to see that on mobile I don't know it. 🤷‍♂️

Lol! Are you serious? Just... Everything? For starters, Hilary will go to jail, Mexico will pay for the wall, and putin is just a great guy. There are prison riots more comedic than nazi rallies, so that's a pretty low bar. As for bidens being a closer match, you've gotta be kidding me? Whilst...

Loud angry man, screaming nonsense to confused people desperate for something to improve their crappy situation, not realising how deeply they're being lied to and manipulated by their charismatic wannabe dictator. EDIT; Though, the comparison was never even really tangential to the point, it...

And I'm sure that has nothing to do with being demonstrably wrong every step of this argument, and is entirely because of butt hurt about the word choice.

“They’re very special,” the president said as Hannity and another Fox guest, Jeanine Pirro, crossed over from the screen to the stage. “They’ve done an incredible job for us. They’ve been with us from the beginning.” - Trump talking about a couple more from fox news, when he dragged them...

It's two of the biggest talking heads, and I can find more from others if you'd like. But I hardly see the point when your own position is based on one shitty poll. Not a news article, or a segment of one of their shows, not something put together by their creative or editorial staff, or said by...

😑 Well, that was disappointing. How on earth do you call giving the results of public interviews "cheering on" anything? That's not even a devil's advocate opinion piece, it's literally just "We asked a bunch of people these questions, here's what they said." I mean, it might well have bad...

You'll have to show where exactly they did anything of the sort. I somehow missed it and sounds like it'd be good for a laugh.

Uh... Their overwhelmingly positive treatment? You know that fox management were basically working as unofficial PR consultants, and leaking privileged information to him during his campaign, yes?

You know, despite their behaviour fox aren't technically part of the gop apparatus, right?