Search results

Ultimately the issue comes down to you have two different Genres with completely different purposes. Star Trek is essentially Futurist bordering on Transhumanism and Warhammer 40K is satirical to the point of absurdism. Neither one really works in the other's world. It's like trying to mesh...

Eh I'm willing to ignore consequences to a certain extent depending on if everything else can make it entertaining enough (see star wars for example) but...frack the prime directive.

why?

hence why vs. Matches of these two types of factions is pretty much useless as it ultimately comes down to which of the two franchises is the writer of the book a bigger fan of. :LOL:

To be fair if we do include the 29th-century Q-lite/Time Lord-lite federation that could be a very big X factor. As regardless of it's nature, Starfleet could backtrack to whatever events caused the warp to become the chaotic monstrosity it is by the time of 40K and manipulate certain events...

I forgot about those guys.

Oh so literally a self insert of both the writers and the fandom. Yeah the federation is utterly toast.

The more I learn about 40K the more it reads like a punchline to a joke that went over everyone's head. Anyway as powerful as the federation is, it's still bound by rules and 40K is essentially spectacul porn. Federation is toast.