Search results

They wouldn't be doing this if that's was a serious concern. They must have an "alternative" source of funding that doesn't depend on ratings.

That's not Rufus. Rufus at least knows English.

Even if he's 100% sincere, it gives me the Heebie-jeebies to think he's a self-described communist and not ashamed of it. This lot is as bad as nazis, except they hide the malevolent portions of their ideology behind a veneer of superficial morality.

This sentence jumped out at me, so I just want to insert a minor comment. I believe it to be much easier for a left-wing person to debate here than for a right-wing person to debate in SB's whitehall, because here, at least, the mods are not trying to be actively malevolent toward people and try...

It's same old. Still waiting on credible confirmation on this one. Way too good to be true.

Waiting for reliable confirmation.

I see it's Broken Record Time again. Yes, we've been over this a few times already. The lawsuits do not allege fraud because intent is monstrously difficult to prove, especially in the very limited time frame they have. Instead, they opt for a lesser charge of irregularities of sufficient size...

Character should count for much more than that. A truly good politician is also a leader who inspires the citizens and serves as a personal example to strive for. Of course nowadays it's extremely rare in politics, and is probably becoming rarer in the military as well, as the latter also...

IKR? It's truly terrible. I hope that Trump proves the fraud allegations ASAP, so that the pedophile racist conman doesn't become the next US president.

Of course it's disputed. It would honestly shock me if the left did not try to dispute literally every single piece of evidence favouring the fraud allegations.

Yes, but he's skirting the line at the very least.

Careful. Admitting that you're a tankie is a bannable offence on this site.

Ah. Clearly the corona virus doesn't infect horny people. Or something.

Wait, WHAT?!

That's just sad and desperate man. There's not giving up on hope, and then there's making up fantastic scenarios.

Sounds like a pipe dream, and reminds me of the leftists in 2016 who were desperately hoping that the EC votes Clinton because the purpose of its existence is to "guard against populist candidates". The electors are going to vote however they were told to vote by the states that sent them.

It's the 3rd of December. It's been exactly a month. I want to see concrete, tangible results, not pretty speeches.

Some posters are using these numbers to delegitimize Trump's legal team effort, specifically. But any suits that are not Trump's are irrelevant, and cannot be used to reach any conclusions about Trump's team.

That's your interpretation of events. I don't know enough about the particularities of these court cases to judge if they have merit, but there are likely others. We'll see in due time.

That's a pretty brain-dead approach. Either you didn't understand what I'm saying, or you didn't even bother to read. A court of law, in order to convict, requires evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Let's say, for the sake of argument, 99% certainty, 1% possible doubt. That is done to reduce...