Search results

Politics is a sphere, there are two middles. The upper class middle see politics as a distraction to divide people and make them easier to exploit. The lower class middle are those two uninterested, busy, or just plain dumb to get into politics. These are the people Trump spoke to. He is...

There is no such exception for this in the constitution.

Hillery is surround by DNC insiders that she has by the balls most of the time, so it really skews her perspective.

What I'd like to have put into statute (it may need to be made a constitutional amendment for the appropriate authority): Any vote without a chain of study that meets or exceeds the standards set for evidence in a criminal court or fails to meet any other standards for the collection of votes...

Speed doesn't matter here, accuracy does. This Is why I want ECC memory.

You clearly don't understand what you are talking about. The vote counts are what the tabulating machine should be calculating, storing, and providing to the next link in the chain of custody. The vote counts are the only thing that matter. Percentages can calculations are so trivial they can by...

YES. A voting machine should do only one thing: Count votes. Any other software on it is suspicious.

No, tabulating software should not have any reports on it. That is the job of an entirely different project.

Voting tabulators should not only use integers but also ECC memory and other hardware that has been certified for banking.

Because of the way the United States is structured, the only way you can get a civil war is if a State starts one. The fifty states of the union divide us for both good and ill.

I am worried that you are right, because a civil with all the death that comes with it is the optomistic outcome. If we don't have a civil war, the corruption cannot be cleansed.

The reason that there is no civil war is the Right have become cowards. There should have been one decades ago.

It is clear at this point that the fecderal court system is corrupt. Things will not get better until we commit to a civil war. If we are not willing to kill to protect our rights, we will not get to keep them.

The fraud will continue until prosecutions ensue.

Requries a constitutional amendment. Not impossible.

They can. It has no legal effect on the results of the election, but at it would be a powerful political statement that would act as a stepping stone towards either an impeachment or a constitutional amendment.

Actually I disagree. Republicans are too placid to fight unless the states are involved. What will happen is that the federal government will go one way, and republican states will refuse. The powderkeg will stay that way for a few weeks until a spark is available, then things will set off.

No it is not. The constitution has a well defined process for amendments and any attempts to change it through wordplay are acts of usurpation.

Most of scotus were educated at the school where the living document doctrine originates from.

You are misunderstanding what the living document doctrine is. It is not about properly amending the constitution. When they say it is a living document, what they mean is they consider using sophistry to redefine the words in the constitution to be valid law.