Search results

your entire point was about a race issue lol

A close look at how Dominion voting machines work. They are designed to cheat. They can switch votes. They can count the same ballot multiple times. They can count blank ballots. link Any state using them should have their votes totally discarded. Anyone who agreed to have them installed...

Why? They would just dominion themselves a few million votes.

Yes. Also, IIRC, Bush lost all his court cases when he was running against Gore as well, until it went to SCOTUS and he won.

<deleted content> There's no evidence of it being false. Good. The sooner it gets to SCOTUS the sooner it all ends, one way or another.

14 years ago CNN did a report on the voting machines, Venezuela and fraud, saying exactly what they are denying now.

The mountains of evidence of fraud just keeps on growing

While we're at it There's like half a dozen of different photos of Creepy Joe kissing his granddaughter on the lips in public.

This tickles my funny bone. The left launches a media circus over a supposed event decades ago with no evidence. They investigate Trump and launch the impeachment over basically nothing as well. But thousands of affidavits, expert IT professional testimonies, dozens of witnesses and camera...

Couldn't find a source except his lawyer-word on it, so take it with a grain of salt Big if true though.

This may be the reason Trump brought back execution by firing squad.

Watching Rudy's Arizona hearing, a tech expert just confirmed that on election day dominion voting systems were sending some kind fo data to Frankfurt after all.

Not anymore This makes it legal again to destroy evidence.

lol they are already scrubbing the machines

Lets see what a professional has to say about it Yep, shit's shady AF. This will go to SCOTUS, take that to the bank.

Are you trying to convince me or yourself here?

k https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/11/pennsylvania-state-judge-halts-certification-finds-likelihood-mail-in-balloting-procedures-violate-pa-constitution/

k

This is the peculiarity of the US justice system. Often enough it's better to get someone on a lesser charge you have better evidence for, instead of a much more serious charge that's risky and might result in the perp walking free if it fails.

I think it's simply easier to invalidate the fradulent election by proving "irregularities" instead of outright fraud. Irregularities allegations require proving that stuff didn't work as it was supposed to do, Fraud requires proving malicious intent by certain actors on top of it.