LifeisTiresome
Well-known member
<deleted content>
Can't watch it. Who are the quacken lawyers? You mean Trump's Lawyers?
Can't watch it. Who are the quacken lawyers? You mean Trump's Lawyers?
Election 2020 Election 2020: It's (almost) over! (maybe...possibly...ahh who are we kidding, it's 2020!)
- Thread starter Emperor Tippy
- Start date
LifeisTiresome
Well-known member
<deleted content>
Gotcha. Looks like Trumpers getting another hit on them.
Gotcha. Looks like Trumpers getting another hit on them.
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Joe hurt his foot. Something when playing with a cat?
Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
This is a pretty straightforward preservation of evidence directive, although this is a *very* preliminary order. Note that the judge hasn't actually ordered that the voting machine information must be shown to the plaintiff; he's ordered that the information must be *preserved* pending his actual decision in the matter, and that both sides must now move to the next step in the process, which is presenting the factual basis for their respective arguments.
That said, "Defendant does not have lawful authority to do what the plaintiff wants the court to order them to do" is a completely valid point, and one that is correctly handled by said amendment of the complaint to add the proper parties (exactly as the ruling itself says). It would be negligent of the defense to *not* make that point, however, as failing to do so would potentially put them in the position of being under court orders to take actions that they legally cannot.
That said, "Defendant does not have lawful authority to do what the plaintiff wants the court to order them to do" is a completely valid point, and one that is correctly handled by said amendment of the complaint to add the proper parties (exactly as the ruling itself says). It would be negligent of the defense to *not* make that point, however, as failing to do so would potentially put them in the position of being under court orders to take actions that they legally cannot.
Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
<deleted content>
Orange Man Bad.
Orange Man Bad.
Last edited:
Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
Seriously though what the fuck has Trump done that makes him a "Rupungent man that inspires loathing"?
He wasn't the establishment
He uses bad doodoo language and is "unpresidential".
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Hasn't previous presidents done their own tantrums?
Terthna
Professional Lurker
<deleted content>
By the way, how's life in that glass house of yours? Did you ever get the house warming present I got you; the full-sized mirror?
I'll be honest; I haven't agreed with many of the decisions Trump has made, but pretty much every person I've ever seen who considers him a "repugnant individual that inspires loathing", are projecting a lot of themselves onto him.
By the way, how's life in that glass house of yours? Did you ever get the house warming present I got you; the full-sized mirror?
I'll be honest; I haven't agreed with many of the decisions Trump has made, but pretty much every person I've ever seen who considers him a "repugnant individual that inspires loathing", are projecting a lot of themselves onto him.
Hell, yeah, why not. Preferably not stuff from 20 years ago or merely policies you don't like.
Yes. Backed by evidence
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
People do hate him for fucking the Kurds over.
I also disliked that move, but nobody can be called "a repugnant man" over it. Otherwise Obama is a "repugnant man" for knowingly allowing Hezbollah to sell drugs to Americans on American soil.
trump is kind of an ass, but he's not a complete monster, or even a monster at all just a guy who is rough around the edges and kind of an asshole. As presidents go he's probally less of a prick then LBJ was.
Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
Yes. give me something that isn't regurgitated NPC shit.
Terthna
Professional Lurker
Obama is a repugnant man for ordering the assassination of an innocent child who was also an American citizen, solely because of who his father was.