Because that's millions of dollars down the drain? No, worse, it's millions of dollars given to your worst enemies. Imagine instead: those millions of dollars spent on people who try to uphold the constitution while selling us out. I think
John Zmirak put it best. Commenting on the then-recent
Bostock case, he said the following:
The love of money is the root of all evil and in this case it isn't going anywhere else, so why act as though it's a huge net loss? (Unless your going to make the but if we eat less meat! Vegetarian logic.) The reality is that if it wasn't going to them it would be going to something as equally useless, even if we could stop people from donating to the cause.
I mean, with friends like these, you don't need enemies. So why would you give your money to them?
Because they are useful, love or hate them. I do the later every second of the day, after all like all politicians they are liars with empty promises, the sad thing though is that's how it will be till our death's and like all sin we have to face it one way or another.
As opposed to the ideal of... fighting the same losing battle in the same way over and over again and expecting a different result?
When your fighting a defensive war against a overwhelming opponent staying in your fort is a far better idea than leaving or surrendering and sometimes
their is no clear way to win. This is one of those cases, liberalism and younger voters are drifting leftward, like it or not and their movement is on the rise, love it or hate it. We have no real winning strategy at the moment so we must do what we can and hold until a situation present's itself that we can win or a concrete strategy present's itself.
The above, (And I mean no real offense) is the strategy you are proposing, the situation is lost and because you are desperate you are saying we should do the one thing that sounds the most stupid when the most logical thing is to hold are ground as it's all we have at the moment.
If you don't like my suggestions, then come up with your own. But falling back on losing strategies like "defending the Constitution" because they are comfortable is intellectually lazy and won't get you the results you want. You might as well spend your time dancing the Ghost Dance.
Says the man who doesn't even have a plan himself.
In any case, mine is as above a simplistic
'Hold our ground' strategy' you may say it is intellectually lazy and yet yours falls even
farther in that regard, as you have
no plan beyond
'abandon the system' and
'it's flawed.' It's the same lazy excuse 'true anarchist' and 'true communist' use to promote their want to tear down the system
everytime.
Your plan and mine are similar in every regard, they are both 'wait and see type plans' the main difference between them being that mine relies on doing the logical thing, staying put with the weapons we have while studying our options and hoping for a change in the weather, yours is just abandon everything and just hope '
somehow' it works out.
The fact is like it or not their is no 'winning strategy' at the moment and we have to just hold onto what we got until we see a opening in the storm, not sail aimlessly into it.