DarthOne

☦️
EXCLUSIVE: Chinese Communist Party-Tied Group To Run Midterm ‘Election Observer’ Program In Swing States



  • The Carter Center will deploy “nonpartisan election observers” in Fulton County, Georgia for the upcoming midterms
  • The group is also combatting election “misinformation” in states including Arizona, insisting there is “no evidence of fraud”
  • It has a long track record of working with Chinese Communist Party-funded influence groups
  • The Carter Center is partnered with the Chinese Communist Party on election oversight in China
  • Other prominent partners of the Carter Center include Pfizer Inc., The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and George Soros’s Open Society Foundation
THE CARTER CENTER, which is partnered with several Chinese Communist Party-funded foreign influence groups, is dispatching “nonpartisan” election observers and sponsoring initiatives to combat election “misinformation” for the Nov. 8 midterms, War Room can reveal.

The center, founded by its namesake, former president Jimmy Carter, has also signed agreements with the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Ministry of Civil Affairs to cooperate on administering elections in China and has invited CCP officials overseas to observe elections in the U.S.

The Carter Center’s ample ties to Beijing have been repeatedly flagged by U.S. lawmakers, as it has worked with several groups operating under China’s “United Front.”

A multi-billion-dollar political warfare operation, the United Front has been described by former CCP Chairman Mao Zedong as a “magic weapon” to ensure communism’s victory over democracy. American officials have also identified the effort as working to “co-opt and neutralize sources of potential opposition” and “influence foreign governments to take actions or adopt positions supportive of Beijing.”

ELECTION WARFARE

While maintaining these compromising ties, one of the primary operations of the Carter Center has been conducting “election observation” missions for over 100 elections across 39 countries.

Since 2020, it has pledged to carry out similar operations in the U.S.

“The Carter Center has been working to support elections at home by providing objective information about the election process and advancing good practices in transparency,” outlines the center before noting “our efforts have expanded in 2022 and will continue to grow in the run-up to 2024.”

Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Florida, and North Carolina are the primary states of interest for the Carter Center.

For example, the Carter Center was recently selected by Georgia’s Fulton County Board of Elections and the Performance Review Board to send “nonpartisan election observers” to oversee the upcoming Nov. 8 midterms. Fulton County, which includes the city of Atlanta, was reportedly a hotbed of voter fraud during the 2020 election.

The Carter Center will be responsible for “absentee ballot issuance and processing; early voting and election day polling places; election day operations in the elections office; and post-election procedures” in the controversial county, according to a press release.

The Carter Center’s unearthed efforts to influence the upcoming midterm elections follow the group playing a leading role in monitoring the audit of Georgia’s election results in 2020.

In 2020, the center worked on an election security task force for Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office as the sole “nonpartisan” observer for the audit.

The Carter Center is also conducting operations in Arizona, recently launching the Arizona Democracy Resilience Network to suppress discussion of voter fraud among candidates and combat election “misinformation.” Among the group’s demands are that candidates “cooperate with elections officials” and “avoid spreading falsehoods.”

“When you have candidates talking about fraud when there’s really been no evidence of fraud and fraud before an election is even held, it presents the kind of atmosphere out there that can lead to things down the road that you just don’t want to see happen,” explained Arizona Democracy Resilience Network co-director Don Henninger.

The Arizona Democracy Resilience Network has identified Maricopa and Pima counties as its primary targets, both of which were believed to have been plagued with extensive voter fraud during the 2020 election.

In an effort to boost confidence in the security of Arizona’s elections, which will be administered by Democratic gubernatorial candidate Katie Hobbs, the Carter Center’s group is sponsoring statewide events such as “Follow the Ballot: Be Confident Your Vote Is Counted” to undercut claims of voter fraud.

In addition to its Arizona and Georgia operations, the Carter Center is also behind the North Carolina Network for Fair, Safe, and Secure Elections, which is sponsoring a state-wide “Trusted Elections” tour.

The group is also set to launch a similar campaign in Florida and has pledged to deploy “non-partisan election observers” in Michigan.

CCP SELLOUTS

The Carter Center’s newfound interest in influencing American elections, however, follows decades of collaboration with the CCP and its foreign influence operations conducted through “United Front” groups.

Since 2012, the Carter Center has worked alongside the China United States Exchange Foundation (CUSEF), which was founded by the Vice-Chairman of the United Front’s oversight department. CUSEF has previously sponsored trips to China for American journalists and former congressmen in exchange for “favorable coverage,” as revealed by Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) filings.

The Carter Center, which has accepted funds from CUSEF, has sponsored a host of dialogues and events with the controversial group, providing a platform to argue fo increasing ties between America and the CCP.

The center also retains links to the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries, which has been dubbed the “public face” of the United Front and flagged by the U.S. State Department for its campaigns to “directly and malignly influence” American officials.

Other United Front groups that the Carter Center has collaborated with include the Chinese People’s Association for Peace and Disarmament, the Center for China and Globalization, and the U.S.-China Heartland Association, which explicitly targets American farmers and farmland.

The Carter Center has also hosted events alongside the China Research Center (CRC), which is financially supported by Confucius Institutes. Confucius Institutes have been described by Chinese government officials as “an important part of China’s overseas propaganda set-up” and are notoriously rife with intellectual property theft and espionage.

FOREIGN ELECTION INTERFERENCE?

The Carter Center’s ties to the CCP run deeper, as it signed a memorandum of understanding with the regime’s Ministry of Civil Affairs in 1998 to collaborate on various election matters in China at the village and township level.

The Carter Center, which was the first foreign organization allowed to observe elections above the village level in China, has published extensive reports on the CCP’s elections, routinely failing to offer any harsh criticism of the regime’s electoral manipulation and intimidation.

“In those villages which we saw and heard about, the basic norms of a democratic election have been conveyed and are being implemented,” explained one report.

Under the memorandum, the Carter Center worked with the CCP’s Ministry of Civil Affairs “to set up a computer network system for election data gathering; to standardize electoral procedures; to design and organize training sessions of election officials; and to promote exchanges between China and the United States on election observations and researches on election-related topics,” according to a synopsis of the agreement.

“All Carter Center programming is done in consultation with Chinese government agencies and designed to deepen reform measures on the government agenda,” it adds.

The memorandum also led to the Carter Center hosting delegations of CCP officials visiting the U.S. to observe elections in 1998, 2000, 2002, and 2006.

Déjà Vu Blue?
Beyond its Chinese Communist Party ties, the group’s expansion into American elections has been met with considerable pushback due to its apparent left-wing political bias. Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, attacked President Donald Trump ahead of the 2020 election, insisting four more years of his presidency would be a “disaster.”

Other partners of the Carter Center include Pfizer Inc., George Soros’s Open Society Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the World Health Organization.

The news also follows controversy over hundreds of millions of dollars flowing from left-wing donors, most notably Mark Zuckerberg, into activist groups exploiting vote-by-mail.

Personally, I have to half-wonder if the Dems/Deep State will let MAGA Republicans win...just so they can get blamed when the economy falls apart.
 

Abhorsen

Local Degenerate
Moderator
Staff Member
Comrade
Osaul
Honestly, the more I learn about Oz, the more I want him to lose. A senate seat isn't worth having Dr Oz in it. He's just scum. He glowed up Jussie Smollett after his lies during an interview.

Here he is promoting trans kids:


I don't want him to win, to tell the truth.
 
Last edited:

Proxy 404

Well-known member
Oh shit, an intelligent thought from you
Not really the guy has always just pissed me off to my core, even I don't ignore shit like that and when I eventually looked in to him well I wasn't surprised. if you'd vote for memet oz because he has a R by his name, please pick anyone you know in that party and vote for them instead
 
Last edited:

Abhorsen

Local Degenerate
Moderator
Staff Member
Comrade
Osaul
Look, realistically, it’s either Oz or Fetterman- who’s a sick man and like Biden will just be another semi-willing puppet. I don’t like Oz, but I doubt Fetterman or his handlers will be an improvement.
If I had to be stuck with one forever, give me Oz. But my issue is that Fetterman is gonna be gone next election cycle, giving a new, better republican a chance to win. In contrast, with Oz, you'll be stuck with Oz for years and years.
 

DarthOne

☦️
If I had to be stuck with one forever, give me Oz. But my issue is that Fetterman is gonna be gone next election cycle, giving a new, better republican a chance to win. In contrast, with Oz, you'll be stuck with Oz for years and years.
And how are you so sure? Because who’d have thought Biden would still be nominally running the country back in 2020?
 

Abhorsen

Local Degenerate
Moderator
Staff Member
Comrade
Osaul
Predictions for the outlook for the United States Senate next Tuesday night?
I got Republicans at 53

And how are you so sure? Because who’d have thought Biden would still be nominally running the country back in 2020?
2 years? I expected him to run again. But 6 years? He'll be gone then (and more than likely he'll have stepped down and let the Governor appoint a replacement). Also, incompetence without being able to fuck the country is a helluva lot better than a permanent bad.
 
Time for Bold Predictions for the United States Senate

49ersfootball

Well-known member
Howdy from the Alamo City Sietch family. It's time for Bold Predictions on what the United States Senate will look like on Tuesday night 😎
@DarthOne @Stargazer @Simonbob @stevep @TheRomanSlayer @Zyobot @The Whispering Monk @f1onagher @Mimas @Carrot of Truth @Circle of Willis @Cherico @gral @Vyor @Julio92 @bintananth

I have the GOP winning back the following:
*NV: Odds are the NV GOP might sweep all of the statewide offices over there. Laxalt might be a future President or VP on the GOP side in the future: GOP GAIN.

*GA: Walker gets carried over the finish line by Kemp: GOP GAIN.

*AZ: Masters defeats Kelly very easily: GOP GAIN.

US Senate contests to watch very closely:
*NH
*CO
*WA St
 

Abhorsen

Local Degenerate
Moderator
Staff Member
Comrade
Osaul
Howdy from the Alamo City Sietch family. It's time for Bold Predictions on what the United States Senate will look like on Tuesday night 😎
@DarthOne @Stargazer @Simonbob @stevep @TheRomanSlayer @Zyobot @The Whispering Monk @f1onagher @Mimas @Carrot of Truth @Circle of Willis @Cherico @gral @Vyor @Julio92 @bintananth

I have the GOP winning back the following:
*NV: Odds are the NV GOP might sweep all of the statewide offices over there. Laxalt might be a future President or VP on the GOP side in the future: GOP GAIN.

*GA: Walker gets carried over the finish line by Kemp: GOP GAIN.

*AZ: Masters defeats Kelly very easily: GOP GAIN.

US Senate contests to watch very closely:
*NH
*CO
*WA St
Could you make a poll for senate seat distribution after election?
 

Stargazer

Well-known member
Howdy from the Alamo City Sietch family. It's time for Bold Predictions on what the United States Senate will look like on Tuesday night 😎
@DarthOne @Stargazer @Simonbob @stevep @TheRomanSlayer @Zyobot @The Whispering Monk @f1onagher @Mimas @Carrot of Truth @Circle of Willis @Cherico @gral @Vyor @Julio92 @bintananth

I have the GOP winning back the following:
*NV: Odds are the NV GOP might sweep all of the statewide offices over there. Laxalt might be a future President or VP on the GOP side in the future: GOP GAIN.

*GA: Walker gets carried over the finish line by Kemp: GOP GAIN.

*AZ: Masters defeats Kelly very easily: GOP GAIN.

US Senate contests to watch very closely:
*NH
*CO
*WA St

Anything could happen Tuesday night. It should be easy for the GOP to take control of the Senate in the current political climate, but a few bad nominees make it harder than it had to be. Things are looking better than they did just a couple months ago, but still tight.

I'm most interested in PA. Neither party has to be happy with their candidate in PA. On the one hand, Dr Oz. On the other hand, a stroke victim who can't string together an intelligible sentence in English. Any other candidate would run away with the race against their given opponent. I used to think this was pretty clearly going in the Dems' favor. After seeing Fetterman debate in public though, PA voters have to see the reality. Are Pennsylvania voters so set at being anti-Oz, anti-Republican, that they'll choose a man with clear mental disabilities due to the stroke to represent their state's interests in the Senate? He's not a functioning statesman, he's just a rubber stamp to whatever Democratic agenda comes through. It's going to be telling for the Democrat mentality if they still show up with enough votes to put a literal marionette in office.

(And this whole time I'm wishing it was Kathy Barnett who was set to beat Fetterman instead)

Blake Masters isn't a great candidate. I'm skeptical he would pull a win against Kelly on his own. His saving grace may be that he's on the same ballot as Kari Lake, who seems to be running a better campaign. Voters who show up for Kari may vote Republican down the ticket, including Masters, and that may be enough for him to win.

Herschel Walker is also not a great candidate. Particularly after the scandal about him paying for his mistress to have an abortion. Is he still better than Raphael Warnock though? Maybe. Better enough to win in Georgia. I would bet on Walker winning.

Would be huge if the GOP can flip AZ and GA back and hold on to PA and OH though.
 

Abhorsen

Local Degenerate
Moderator
Staff Member
Comrade
Osaul
Blake Masters isn't a great candidate. I'm skeptical he would pull a win against Kelly on his own. His saving grace may be that he's on the same ballot as Kari Lake, who seems to be running a better campaign. Voters who show up for Kari may vote Republican down the ticket, including Masters, and that may be enough for him to win.
Blake Masters only really has a chance because he promised stuff to the Libertarian candidate to drop out. Now whether he promised enough (or even made promises) is up to debate, I haven't looked a huge amount into what he said, but I like the general idea that this establishes:
The libertarian party has demonstrated it can play spoiler. It's also now, potentially, willing to not play spoiler if and only if enough freedom is promised by one side. This seems to be one pathway forward to enacting liberty. So because of this, I really want Masters to win, and set this up as working tactic.

The other tactic isn't really expandable, and it's the complete infiltration and take over of the Republican party. This is what is happening in NH, and it's fueled by a massive 20 year movement to get libertarians to move to NH. So I'd like a strategy for other places as well.
 

Stargazer

Well-known member
Blake Masters only really has a chance because he promised stuff to the Libertarian candidate to drop out. Now whether he promised enough (or even made promises) is up to debate, I haven't looked a huge amount into what he said, but I like the general idea that this establishes:
The libertarian party has demonstrated it can play spoiler. It's also now, potentially, willing to not play spoiler if and only if enough freedom is promised by one side. This seems to be one pathway forward to enacting liberty. So because of this, I really want Masters to win, and set this up as working tactic.

The other tactic isn't really expandable, and it's the complete infiltration and take over of the Republican party. This is what is happening in NH, and it's fueled by a massive 20 year movement to get libertarians to move to NH. So I'd like a strategy for other places as well.

Yeahhhhh... the same NH Libertarians that post crap like this and double down when called out on it?



No thanks. I have some sympathies with libertarianism, but more conservative than anything else. I'm not thrilled by Masters. The GOP candidates I like are guys like DeSantis, Youngkin.

I don't know, it just kind of strikes me that libertarianism is a loser mentality for the GOP. It's giving up on actually winning the culture war, on winning the conflicts about moral standards in our country, and banking on just maintaining the right to exist. That's not the way to actually win. That's ceding more ground to appease the opposition, and when it comes down to it, do we really think they'll be content to stop with letting us exist? No. They're going for the jugular. One thing that's been highlighted in FL was how the school systems would socially transition students, as early as middle school, without informing or getting the consent of the parents. That is the kind of mentality conservatives are up against. Progressives do want to indoctrinate your kids into their ideology, whether you want it or not, and they're deeply embedded in the public school system to accomplish it. We need to be able to fight that mentality, and we need to be able to win that fight.

So no, I don't think the GOP needs more Libertarian influence in the party. Or, in other words

tenor.gif
 
Last edited:

Vyor

My influence grows!
I don't know, it just kind of strikes me that libertarianism is a loser mentality for the GOP. It's giving up on actually winning the culture war, on winning the conflicts about moral standards in our country, and banking on just maintaining the right to exist. That's not the way to actually win. That's ceding more ground to appease the opposition, and when it comes down to it, do we really think they'll be content to stop with letting us exist? No. They're going for the jugular. One thing that's been highlighted FL was how the school systems would socially transition students, as early as middle school, without informing or getting the consent of the parents. That is the kind of mentality conservatives are up against. Progressives do want to indoctrinate your kids into their ideology, whether you want it or not, and they're deeply embedded in the public school system to accomplish it. We need to be able to fight that mentality, and we need to be able to win that fight.

You know nothing about libertarianism.
 

Stargazer

Well-known member
You know nothing about libertarianism.

Maybe. I have a brother who's big into libertarianism, actually got me to vote for Gary Johnson in 2016 (blech, it was more an anti-Trump and anti-Hillary vote than anything else). He's all about economics and really doesn't seem to give a crap about the social issues that I find to be important. Could you explain the Libertarian platform, and why I should support Libertarian candidates over Republican candidates?
 

DarthOne

☦️


MSNBC Historian Claims If GOP Wins Midterms Your Kids Will Be Arrested And Killed

God in heaven. This whole thing is turning into a powder keg. Some idiot is going to believe this and going to get people killed. Especially with the Right being on the look out for voter fraud; this is just going to push tensions higher.

I can just imagine some leftard looking at a protest in response to voter fraud and taking action. ( because the protestors are clearly all fascists and must be stopped) Which probably would involve fists, pepper spray and/or a bike lock or similar. Though I would not rule out a Vehicle of Peace or even a gun.
 

Vyor

My influence grows!
Maybe. I have a brother who's big into libertarianism, actually got me to vote for Gary Johnson in 2016 (blech, it was more an anti-Trump and anti-Hillary vote than anything else). He's all about economics and really doesn't seem to give a crap about the social issues that I find to be important. Could you explain the Libertarian platform, and why I should support Libertarian candidates over Republican candidates?

They. Do Not. Agree. With. You.

They want gay marriage. They want legalization of drugs. They want more freedom, period. They want less government period.

They. Do. Not. Agree. With. You.

They are not fighting "for the right to exist", they are not fighting for your causes, they are nothing like you and they never will be anything like you.

Stop acting like they are.

They are not on the right wing, they are not on the left wing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top