United States 2nd Amendment Legal Cases and Law Discussion

Urabrask Revealed

Let them go.
Founder
Whats the context here?
Fedsboys live and die by their anonymity. By putting out their face to the internet, plenty of infiltrated militias can stumble over these images and realize "Hey, I know these guys!" Best case, they merely get kicked out and blacklisted, "worst" case it's a short trip to the quieter parts of a forest and a short drop for the exposed feddies.

No one likes feddies.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
Fedsboys live and die by their anonymity. By putting out their face to the internet, plenty of infiltrated militias can stumble over these images and realize "Hey, I know these guys!" Best case, they merely get kicked out and blacklisted, "worst" case it's a short trip to the quieter parts of a forest and a short drop for the exposed feddies.

No one likes feddies.
Undercover agents are not the same as the ones who would run a booth like that
 

stephen the barbarian

Well-known member
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lawsuit-filed-against-black-rifle-235900301.html
1791 Management sends letter to Black Rifle Coffee Company (BRCC) demanding they brew up an "action plan" to address serious allegations of Corporate Governance failures and Code of Conduct violations

I regrettably must communicate with you via this public forum because as of recently, it appears you have decided to cease all communications with us.

1791 Management LLC ("1791") manages certain entities that hold Black Rifle Coffee Company's shares ("Black Rifle" or the "Company"). Please do not confuse our stake as a vote of confidence in the Company's Leadership. On the contrary, in just three months of being a public company, in our opinion you have caused significant harm to your shareholders and military veterans. It is our belief that you may be one of the most dangerous CEOs in America.

Black Rifle Coffee Company has been accused of monetary shenanigans.

relevant because of their advertising, and their bailing on Rittenhouse
 

The Immortal Watch Dog

Well-known member
Hetman
Yes.
Because it is how you get families killed

You're assuming that America's Federal law enforcement forcement apparatus acts like a law enforcement apparatus and not like an organized crime syndicate.

Which is historically not the case.


Black Rino Coffee company.
 

bullethead

Part-time fanfic writer
Super Moderator
Staff Member

Hlaalu Agent

Nerevar going to let you down
Founder
Here's a case of anti-gun government/law enforcement getting screwed for their douchebaggery:
Article:
NEW: Wright v. Beck (C.D. CA): Los Angeles agrees to pay Wayne Wright nearly $1 million after LAPD secretly destroyed his guns while he was working through the courts to have them returned.


Are they going to be imprisoned for their criminal acts? If not, it is still insufficient.
 
Pittsburg anti-2A laws struck down

Bear Ribs

Well-known member

Pittsburgh's Red Flag Law, Mag Ban, and AWB Ban have all been struck down.
 

Ixian

Well-known member
Lots of talk from the Biden administration of raising the legal age to purchase a rifle from 18 to 21.

Wonder if they are planning on raising the Draft age to 21 as well, or if they still plan to send 18 year olds off to die in some Biden boondoggle with a rifle they can't legally own in the States?
 

BlackDragon98

Freikorps Kommandant
Banned - Politics
When they incinerated children for clout at Waco.


a65.jpg
Note to self: bait traps with KFC and donuts
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Taking this here, since it's the general gun-policy thread:

When the US was founded this was, in fact, the case. Private citizens could and did own warships, artillery, and no few private combat regiments. Anti-gun activists like to say these weren't actually effective (They were) and just handwave stuff like the Green Mountain Boys capturing forts or the Virginia Privateers raiding all the way to the English Channel.

Okay, thanks.

Have heard about private citizens owning lots of heavy weaponry, here and there, but not about the specific incident you've cited, so I'll check it out.

In the modern day, though, only the most extreme gun-rights activists are going to suggest privately-owned nuclear weapons are a good idea.

Never said I agreed, at least not in practice. Problem is, I'd think that an amendment designed to ensure that common citizens can fight back against a tyrannical government would imply that they're on more or less equal footing with them, as far as weapons are concerned (which also means nukes). Again, though, never said it was a good idea in practice, and I'm sure it's one of those "grey areas" even 2nd Amendment absolutists would need to stop and think about, if they somehow wound up in charge.
 

posh-goofiness

Well-known member
Never said I agreed, at least not in practice. Problem is, I'd think that an amendment designed to ensure that common citizens can fight back against a tyrannical government would imply that they're on more or less equal footing with them, as far as weapons are concerned (which also means nukes). Again, though, never said it was a good idea in practice, and I'm sure it's one of those "grey areas" even 2nd Amendment absolutists would need to stop and think about, if they somehow wound up in charge.
As an absolutist, I can confidently say we don't need to think about this. Private citizen must be able to create, own, operate, sell, and transfer the full NBC suite of weaponry.
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
As an absolutist, I can confidently say we don't need to think about this. Private citizen must be able to create, own, operate, sell, and transfer the full NBC suite of weaponry.

How do you think that'd work in practice, out of curiosity?

For one, I'm pretty skeptical of private nuke ownership, though I can also imagine them being prohibitively expensive to buy and maintain, as well as kept under 24/7 lock and key by the handful of super-rich people who do wind up owning them. Not sure I'd want private nukes in the hands of the current elites, though seeing as they have control over a global nuclear stockpile that the taxpayers are footing the bill for, as is, well...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top