In this case, one of yours seems to be that the actions and policies of a Deity should be easily understandable to a mortal human.
Why
shouldn't a conscious actor be understandable by other conscious actors when we do not actually have material examples of
inability to be understood? This is a prior assumption on top of the prior assumptions that the First Cause God even
exists, that it's an actor in the first place, that it's immaterial and thus unfalsifiable, that it somehow reproduces as an immaterial being in fashion that makes "son" a meaningful distinction, that its divinity is a heritable characteristic for its son to be independently divine, that said inherited divinity is a separate but equal part of said son...
You can reduce these prior assumptions with reasoning, but this spirals to
vast reams actively working around the surface-level issues ever increasingly detached from scripture. And because of the obsession with Truth as a
static taken on faith, the scripture
cannot change to ease the problem by including such clarifications in additions to the "core".
Also, let me point out that much of what a lot of people think they know about Satan, Hell, and so on comes not from the Bible at all, but from traditions derived from Dante, Milton, etc.
It's still what the general body of "faithful" think of, to the point of being an active thorn in the side of Catholicism. The Problem of Evil is much less an issue for this lay interpretation of Christianity that was a very long-standing
historic norm because it passively accrued mythology giving opposing causes plugging those holes.
Are you complaining about God allowing bad things to happen, or something else entirely?
It's starting with describing the underlying nature of The Problem of Evil as a logic problem and moving into how Christianity's obsession with being "The Truth" ends up with issues for the sheer amount of exclusion. Saying that
everything in the BC was wrong one way or another is quite the mountain of a claim, and unlike with science they can't
show anything is wrong.
Entirely ignoring the near omnipresence of
supposed followers not remotely adhering to doctrine in their personal beliefs turning "official doctrine" into an Ivory Tower fart-sniffing matter,
long before secular views. Hence the witch hunts. And also werewolves, of all things.
Meanwhile, let's chuck Special Relativity in the trashcan, shall we? It's obviously a lot of doubletalk and trying to have things both ways at once. And as for Quantum Mechanics... oh boy...
The difference is that all of those have experiments one can do which would prove them wrong. These experiments have been done and the results fit with the theory, no matter how counter-intuitive those theories are. The double slit experiment is a thing
literally showing wave-particle duality. Where's the experiments to prove Christian theology wrong?
And the whole concept of nuclear power? Atoms are indivisible by definition! It's what the word atomos means. Isn't it obvious to any thinking man that self-contradictory things cannot be true?
Atoms got that name because they
are the smallest unit of chemistry and such was thought the smallest foundation of matter (hence "(Al)Chemical Elements", calling back to the antiquity theory of Four Elements of matter), but eventually it was
proven there was lower-level phenomena showing atoms had constituent components...
And the name stuck, because that's the name it was first given. Holdover vocabulary is a
thing. Look up "Minim" in music theory for another example of this. "Semi Demi Hemi Quasai Minim" is a thing that exists, being 1/8th of what
used to be "the smallest duration a note can take". Also "the modern period" starting in the
1500s.
Asia and Africa are connected,but Europe is simply part of Asia.That is difference.
How wide does the border need to be to be "connected" versus "part of", and at what point is the difference of Europe from the Middle East from China enough to ignore the geology? The Ural Mountains in particular are a distinct land border that imposes
some travel limitations, for all they are no Alps.
Oligarhy is nothing new,but oligarchy which do not even try to pretend that they care about law,like UE now,must fall quickly.
Civil Law has survived several instances of this. Hell, Anglosphere Common Law has gone through this courtesy of Bad Kings. And the European Union is not a hegemon nor a sovereign, Eastern Europe routinely tells it to fuck off about one thing or another and France is getting increasingly militant about maintaining secular rule in
thorough contradiction of you saying the place is "overrun with Sharia law".
Do you knew how much probable is universe with laws that allow us live ?
Mere improbability is not enough. You need to show it's
concretely more likely to have God, with actual numbers, not just dismiss "It Just Happened" because "it's obscenely improbable".
