Five minutes of hate news

Urabrask Revealed

Let them go.
Founder
Soon, the german regime will start prosecuting the descendants of the "nazis" they weren't able to sentence because they were too slow.
More traditional Hate News. This involves an alleged TikTok Challenge and a Student Assaulting a Disabled Wheelchair bound Teacher!
Look at this fatso. She's grinning. She knows she will get away with assaulting a disabled teacher because said teacher is white. There will be a slap on the wrist for her, the teacher will leave school, and she will have clout and bragging right among her fellow blacks. This will continue until enough whites decide that enough is enough.
 

AnimalNoodles

Well-known member
Soon, the german regime will start prosecuting the descendants of the "nazis" they weren't able to sentence because they were too slow.

Look at this fatso. She's grinning. She knows she will get away with assaulting a disabled teacher because said teacher is white. There will be a slap on the wrist for her, the teacher will leave school, and she will have clout and bragging right among her fellow blacks. This will continue until enough whites decide that enough is enough.

Welcome to Burgerpunk America. Cyberpunk, but faker, gayer, with all the bad shit and none of the cool shit.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
Welcome to Burgerpunk America. Cyberpunk, but faker, gayer, with all the bad shit and none of the cool shit.

all of the future technology that people talk about is actually here, the problem is power storage.

Why cant we have power armor? Shitty batteries.

Jet packs? Shitty batteries, actual hover boards shitty batteries, cybernetics shitty batteries.

The future came but batteries were not included.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
Actually, jet pack run off kerosene, and work just fine, but using them is dangerous so they are basically sky diving for people who are rich.
Also flying cars will never escpae the fact that they are helicopters that taxi very well.
And the fact that you need a pilots license and a driver's license for it
 

Aldarion

Neoreactionary Monarchist
People seem to have a hard enough time with two dimensions - I can't imagine why anyone would want them using flying cars.

Because it would solve a lot of problems of 2D travel - such as less likelyhood of hitting pedestrians, greater ability to avoid other vehicles, no issues with terrain... of course, people typically forget (and ignore) problems with 3D travel not inherent in 2D travel, such as the 3D disorientation (thus flying into ground), engine giving out (thus flying into ground), greater speeds, atmospheric conditions...
 

Despite

Active member
Soon, the german regime will start prosecuting the descendants of the "nazis" they weren't able to sentence because they were too slow.

Look at this fatso. She's grinning. She knows she will get away with assaulting a disabled teacher because said teacher is white. There will be a slap on the wrist for her, the teacher will leave school, and she will have clout and bragging right among her fellow blacks. This will continue until enough whites decide that enough is enough.

It seems unlikely that descendants of Nazis will be prosecuted under current laws, unless they committed crimes within modern statutes. The existing situation relies on a precedent that extends a principle from "committed crimes directly" to " indirect responsibility". The people being prosecuted are still contemporaneous. Your assertion is that western laws will be altered to argue that descendents bear the sins of the fathers in direct crimes.

This is highly inplausible. I think it would be more rational to suggest that a new target, or renewed focus might be those who have benefited from the proceeds of Nazi crimes, in terms of corporations who have continuity with their Nazi era versions, banks and other institutions. This would reflect some of the left wing attempts to extract reparations and justice from present day institutions and governments, and I expect it to be as ineffective as those for the most part.

As far as the kid assaulting her teacher goes. I doubt she will get away with anything. She is being charged with a federal crime with a custodial sentence with clear evidence that is indicting her and anyone collaberating. This is less about some sort of racial issue, and more about how social media is exploiting the young, and corporations are hiding from, and being shielded from,their responsibility for pushing and influencing people.

That said, if you're willing to beat up someone obviously weaker than you in a classroom, and it really was just for "likes", you are probably an immature shithead to begin with, social media be damned.

He isn't dead and the justifications essentially set a precedent that is going to make it all worse.

Tldr: you were pedantic about it and failed to notice that I guess?

You imprison pedos for life or execute them. You don't make any excuses for them.

He didn't set a precedent. The precedent already existed with regards the rape statute. If you could not demonstrate the consent issue correctly, then the conviction for rape could not sustained. The mitigating factors in the remaining sentence don't relate to any precedent setting either, since they aren't going to be exactly the same in other cases.

It is difficult to care much for the ill-formed lecturing of someone who at best, provided an incompetent, inaccurate rendition of the situation in the first place as a bizarre segue from another topic, so you can attempt to save face that way if you like, it doesn't change the reality of your failing.

As I said before, you and I are most likely in agreement that this individual deserved a bullet, or life imprisonment, or at the very least deportation, but I think you have a problem understanding how a legal system works.

Taking into account mitigating factors is not "making excuses", its an established principle that cannot be abandoned on the basis of how much you detest a criminal. It is reasonable to argue that there should a way to create a more serious consequence for this filth of a human, but the Prosecutors failed to do so on the basis of a technicality. Judges exist to interpret things within the scope of a legal system, and should do so without attempting to create new laws, and without emotion.

This is an outcome that must be kept enshrined despite the pressure of politics or popular opinion.
 

Urabrask Revealed

Let them go.
Founder
I think it would be more rational to suggest that a new target, or renewed focus might be those who have benefited from the proceeds of Nazi crimes, in terms of corporations who have continuity with their Nazi era versions, banks and other institutions. This would reflect some of the left wing attempts to extract reparations and justice from present day institutions and governments, and I expect it to be as ineffective as those for the most part.
I hope they try that. Either the Left get beaten so hard, they are forced to pay compensation money for emotional distress caused to the corpos, or the fat cats are forced to hand over the money they squeezed out of honest people.
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
The Art Institute of Chicago fires all 122 of its (unpaid and volunteer) docents because they aren’t sufficiently “diverse”

The Art Institute of Chicago (AIC), one of the world’s finest art museums, harbors (or rather, harbored) 122 highly skilled docents, 82 active ones and 40 “school group greeters.” All are volunteers and are all unpaid. Their job is to act as guides to the Museum’s collection of 300,000 works, which they explain to both adults and schoolchildren. I’ve seen them in action at the Museum, and they’re terrific.

Despite the lack of remuneration—they do this to be helpful and because they love art—their training to be docents is extremely rigorous. First, they have to have two training sessions per week for eighteen months, and then “five years of continual research and writing to meet the criteria of 13 museum content areas” (quote from the docents’ letter to the Director of the AIC). On top of that, there’s monthly and biweekly training on new exhibits. Then there are the tours themselves, with a docent giving up to two one-hour tours per day for 18 weeks of the year and a minimum of 24 one-hour tours with adults/families. Their average length of service: 15 years.

Many of the volunteers—though not all—are older white women, who have the time and resources to devote so much free labor to the Museum. But the demographics of that group weren’t appealing to the AIC, and so, in late September, the AIC fired all of them, saying they’d be replaced by smaller number of hired volunteers workers who will be paid $25 an hour. That group will surely meet the envisioned diversity goals.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
It won't.

Docents are sorta the Sergeant Majors of the museum world: they know their shit, wouldn't be there if they didn't enjoy the job, and can teach you a thing or three.
I was making a joke about that they most likely wouldn't be
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top