I would not be against putting soros in prison if you think you can make it happen go ahead.
If you pull it off I owe you a beer.
Five minutes of hate news
- Thread starter PsihoKekec
- Start date
I would not be against putting soros in prison if you think you can make it happen go ahead.
If you pull it off I owe you a beer.
He was from Hungary,and hungarian zionist made deal with germans - they help germans kill other jews,and was spared with families.
Since Izrael 2.0 was created by zionists,they do not punished those people.Maybe Soros was one of them.
bintananth
behind a desk
She's only a year or two older than my grandfather would be if he hadn't died in a car crash in 1959.
He was sent to a place where he could not be drafted during WWII. The women who served during WWII were all volunteers.
That it's being brought up now means Germany can not let bygones be bygones and just let the past be history.
I don't know German law but I do know that US has statutes limiting the amounts of the past which can be brought up in court.
VicSage
Carpenter, Cobbler, Chirugeon, Dataminer.
In this case it's less about the cannot let bygones be bygones, and more of the fact that they had her in court nearly forty years ago. She was not an unknown to the German government, she testified against people who led the camp. They have had over half a century to nab her if they thought she was both guilty and worthwhile. So why would a woman nearing a century in age who did not wield a weapon and had no hand in policy making be the person you'd want to make an example of?
Robovski
Well-known member
Because this is what's left to make their virtue signal with now. The era of forgiveness was 60+ years ago, now is the time of grudges and examples.
bintananth
behind a desk
Meanwhile 4 years ago an Arab man raped a toddler nearly to death at a public pool and a Judge dismissed it because "he had a sexual emergency and his culture said it was a okay."
But nah, gotta lock up near hundred year old women.
Whitestrake Pelinal
Like a dream without a dreamer
Opinion | The Enduring Importance of the 1965 Immigration Act (Published 2021)
How Asians arrived in America.
Not much more than what you said.
I saw a few tweets being shared, stuff like "white men are the real danger to society" and then follow up tweets like "oh he's a POC"
When was the last time a school shooter was released on Bail the next day?
The sheer amount of White privilege some people get in our legal system is crazy af.
The sheer amount of White privilege some people get in our legal system is crazy af.
He's already out on bail and home with his family.
Because protected classes in America and all that.
bintananth
behind a desk
Bail is not a judgment of your innocence or guilt. It's simply a matter of how much is thought necessary to ensure you show up and face the charges. The worse the crime, the higher it is.
Fr'ex; A cop who cites you for jaywalking and lets you go with just a ticket has just released you with no bail required. You are effectively out on bail until that ticket is dealt with.
But its a conspiracy whites are second class citizens in their own nation?
I swear Anglos, stop being so meek.
That is not at all what happened.
The case has some questionable aspects, but what you're saying has very little relation to the reality of the case. Firstly, it was an Austrian case, so the comparison to the German case has little relevance with regards the relative state of jurisprudence you seem to be reaching for. The case in question is probably the Vienna swimming pool rape.
The 20 year old Iraqi raped a 10 year old, the son of a Serbian refugee. He did claim it was necessary because he had not had sex for four months, and he acknowledged it was not acceptable in any countries laws to rape a 10 year old. He was sentenced to six years, to pay compensation, and to face deportation after he served his time. He appealed, and the compensation was increased, as was the sentence, although the specific charge of rape was overturned, because it wasn't possible to prove to the appropriate legal standard that his victim did not consent. Bearing in mind that this is a high burden, which is established devoid of emotional context, and was overturned potentially due to prosecutorial mistakes.
His conviction for aggravated sexual assault was upheld, and the sentence increased. His sentence was revised downwards later. Looking at the translated source from the wiki link, this was done because his conviction for Aggravated Sexual assault would not generally have gotten the incarceration sentencing that it did, and there were mitigating factors that precedent would require were taken into account. In this case a confession with clearly expressed remore, no previous convictions, and relative youth. He was still required to pay compensation.
I don't think it was right, and he is a candidate for the death penalty if I have ever seen one.
Regardless, what you actually said is complete fiction, rendered meaningless when given the reality of the case, although the reasoning of the final Judge has some relevance, in that he compares being part of campaign of sustained abuse and violence, to a singular event, and how the law treats such things differently.
She is being prosecuted now because the legal precedent was relatively recently set to allow her to be prosecuted, from a purely legalistic perspective, and they have been working their way down from people who pulled triggers, and sent orders, to those who might be considered complicit rather than directly responsible. The Germans have been revising their laws as time passes, originally because of statutory limitations on crimes. This was extended specifically for murder several times, to target various Nazi's.
So when she was in court forty years ago, there was probably no motivation to prosecute, with bigger fish around, and potentially no legal precedent.
It shouldn't be ignored that in Germany, making sure they do everything to separate themselves in every sense from Nazi era Germany is something they are very keen to do, whereas it might not be for another nation, as well as it being a nice bonus for someones career.
No, the reality of the case makes it worse
I'm not sure on your logic here, unless it's that your understanding was completely fictional, and the reality is still that a man decided to rape a child, and is by now probably walking free in Germany, instead of being, at worst, catapulted back to his own hellhole rather than enjoying the benefits of western society.
Because what you said that happened really is appalling. It was that cultural reasons were considered enough of a reason to let a man rape a child in a modern first world nation, and the perpetrator got away scot free. We should all be glad you were so poorly informed. Also saying no reality makes it worse doesn't really make sense as a reply to me.
He isn't dead and the justifications essentially set a precedent that is going to make it all worse.
Tldr: you were pedantic about it and failed to notice that I guess?
You imprison pedos for life or execute them. You don't make any excuses for them.